These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32250775)

  • 1. Participation in agri-environmental schemes: A contingent valuation study of farmers in Ireland.
    McGurk E; Hynes S; Thorne F
    J Environ Manage; 2020 May; 262():110243. PubMed ID: 32250775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. More than two decades of Agri-Environment schemes: Has the profile of participating farms changed?
    Cullen P; Hynes S; Ryan M; O'Donoghue C
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Aug; 292():112826. PubMed ID: 34033986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of a coordinated farmland bird conservation project on farmers' intentions to implement nature conservation practices - Evidence from the Swedish Volunteer & Farmer Alliance.
    Josefsson J; Lokhorst AM; Pärt T; Berg Å; Eggers S
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Feb; 187():8-15. PubMed ID: 27865924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Data on farmers' acceptance of results-based agri-environmental schemes.
    Massfeller A; Meraner M; Hüttel S; Uehleke R
    Data Brief; 2022 Dec; 45():108642. PubMed ID: 36426047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors influencing farmer and resident willingness to adopt an agri-environmental scheme in Israel.
    Teff-Seker Y; Segre H; Eizenberg E; Orenstein DE; Shwartz A
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Jan; 302(Pt A):114066. PubMed ID: 34872183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of agri-environment schemes in conservation and environmental management.
    Batáry P; Dicks LV; Kleijn D; Sutherland WJ
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Aug; 29(4):1006-1016. PubMed ID: 25997591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Farmers value on-farm ecosystem services as important, but what are the impediments to participation in PES schemes?
    Page G; Bellotti B
    Sci Total Environ; 2015 May; 515-516():12-9. PubMed ID: 25687782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effort for money? Farmers' rationale for participation in agri-environment measures with different implementation complexity.
    Van Herzele A; Gobin A; Van Gossum P; Acosta L; Waas T; Dendoncker N; Henry de Frahan B
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Dec; 131():110-20. PubMed ID: 24157411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combining the best of two methodological worlds? Integrating Q methodology-based farmer archetypes in a quantitative model of agri-environmental scheme uptake.
    Leonhardt H; Braito M; Uehleke R
    Agric Human Values; 2022; 39(1):217-232. PubMed ID: 35273426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Environmental effects of agri-environmental schemes in Western Europe.
    Primdahl J; Peco B; Schramek J; Andersen E; Oñate JJ
    J Environ Manage; 2003 Feb; 67(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 12654274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is it worth protecting groundwater from diffuse pollution with agri-environmental schemes? A hydro-economic modeling approach.
    Hérivaux C; Orban P; Brouyère S
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Oct; 128():62-74. PubMed ID: 23722175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Varying potential of conservation tools of the Common Agricultural Policy for farmland bird preservation.
    Concepción ED; Díaz M
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Dec; 694():133618. PubMed ID: 31386949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating rural participation in wetland management: A contingent valuation analysis of the set-aside policy in Iran.
    Eskandari-Damaneh H; Noroozi H; M Ghoochani O; Taheri-Reykandeh E; Cotton M
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Dec; 747():141127. PubMed ID: 32777492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Facing the future for grassland restoration - What about the farmers?
    Waldén E; Lindborg R
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Dec; 227():305-312. PubMed ID: 30199726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Financial compensation for natural forest logging ban: Standard calculation based on willingness to accept.
    Liao W; Ye D; Yuan R; Zhang Y; Deng Q
    Sci Prog; 2023; 106(1):368504221145563. PubMed ID: 36637231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing the environmental performance of English arable and livestock holdings using data from the Farm Accountancy Data Network (FADN).
    Westbury DB; Park JR; Mauchline AL; Crane RT; Mortimer SR
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Mar; 92(3):902-9. PubMed ID: 21075506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An analysis of conservation practice adoption studies in agricultural human-natural systems.
    Yoder L; Ward AS; Dalrymple K; Spak S; Lave R
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Apr; 236():490-498. PubMed ID: 30771669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Farmers' Preferences for Future Agricultural Land Use Under the Consideration of Climate Change.
    Pröbstl-Haider U; Mostegl NM; Kelemen-Finan J; Haider W; Formayer H; Kantelhardt J; Moser T; Kapfer M; Trenholm R
    Environ Manage; 2016 Sep; 58(3):446-64. PubMed ID: 27372660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Targeting best agricultural practices to enhance ecosystem services in European mountains.
    Bernués A; Tenza-Peral A; Gómez-Baggethun E; Clemetsen M; Eik LO; Martín-Collado D
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Aug; 316():115255. PubMed ID: 35576705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Farmers' preferences for nutrient and climate-related agri-environmental schemes: A cross-country comparison.
    Hasler B; Czajkowski M; Elofsson K; Hansen LB; Konrad MT; Nielsen HØ; Niskanen O; Nõmmann T; Pedersen AB; Peterson K; Poltimäe H; Svensson TH; Zagórska K
    Ambio; 2019 Nov; 48(11):1290-1303. PubMed ID: 31625049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.