These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32251662)

  • 41. Lateralized irrelevant speech alters visuospatial selective attention mechanisms.
    Schaefer M; Tewes U; Münte TF; Johannes S
    Biol Psychol; 2006 Apr; 72(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 16188366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Neural basis of processing threatening voices in a crowded auditory world.
    Mothes-Lasch M; Becker MP; Miltner WH; Straube T
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 May; 11(5):821-8. PubMed ID: 26884543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Oscillatory activity reflects differential use of spatial reference frames by sighted and blind individuals in tactile attention.
    Schubert JT; Buchholz VN; Föcker J; Engel AK; Röder B; Heed T
    Neuroimage; 2015 Aug; 117():417-28. PubMed ID: 26032885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Discrimination of emotional prosodies in human neonates: A pilot fNIRS study.
    Zhang D; Zhou Y; Hou X; Cui Y; Zhou C
    Neurosci Lett; 2017 Sep; 658():62-66. PubMed ID: 28842278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Blindness influences emotional authenticity perception in voices: Behavioral and ERP evidence.
    Sarzedas J; Lima CF; Roberto MS; Scott SK; Pinheiro AP; Conde T
    Cortex; 2024 Mar; 172():254-270. PubMed ID: 38123404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Attentional load affects automatic emotional processing: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Doallo S; Holguín SR; Cadaveira F
    Neuroreport; 2006 Nov; 17(17):1797-801. PubMed ID: 17164667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effects of congenital blindness on the subcortical representation of speech cues.
    Jafari Z; Malayeri S
    Neuroscience; 2014 Jan; 258():401-9. PubMed ID: 24291729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Spatial metric in blindness: behavioural and cortical processing.
    Gori M; Amadeo MB; Campus C
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2020 Feb; 109():54-62. PubMed ID: 31899299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Neural basis of auditory-induced shifts in visual time-order perception.
    McDonald JJ; Teder-Sälejärvi WA; Di Russo F; Hillyard SA
    Nat Neurosci; 2005 Sep; 8(9):1197-202. PubMed ID: 16056224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Modulation of semantic processing by spatial selective attention.
    McCarthy G; Nobre AC
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993; 88(3):210-9. PubMed ID: 7684969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Auditory motion in the sighted and blind: Early visual deprivation triggers a large-scale imbalance between auditory and "visual" brain regions.
    Dormal G; Rezk M; Yakobov E; Lepore F; Collignon O
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jul; 134():630-644. PubMed ID: 27107468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Differential influences of emotion, task, and novelty on brain regions underlying the processing of speech melody.
    Ethofer T; Kreifelts B; Wiethoff S; Wolf J; Grodd W; Vuilleumier P; Wildgruber D
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jul; 21(7):1255-68. PubMed ID: 18752404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Crossmodal plasticity in the fusiform gyrus of late blind individuals during voice recognition.
    Hölig C; Föcker J; Best A; Röder B; Büchel C
    Neuroimage; 2014 Dec; 103():374-382. PubMed ID: 25280451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Can attention be directed to opposite locations in different modalities? An ERP study.
    Eimer M
    Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Jul; 110(7):1252-9. PubMed ID: 10423190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effects of perceptual context on event-related brain potentials during auditory spatial attention.
    Arnott SR; Alain C
    Psychophysiology; 2002 Sep; 39(5):625-32. PubMed ID: 12236329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Orienting attention to points in time improves stimulus processing both within and across modalities.
    Lange K; Röder B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 May; 18(5):715-29. PubMed ID: 16768372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. An event-related brain potential study of cross-modal links in spatial attention between vision and touch.
    Eimer M; Driver J
    Psychophysiology; 2000 Sep; 37(5):697-705. PubMed ID: 11037046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Selective attention modulates early human evoked potentials during emotional face-voice processing.
    Ho HT; Schröger E; Kotz SA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Apr; 27(4):798-818. PubMed ID: 25269113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Vocal threat enhances visual perception as a function of attention and sex.
    Schirmer A; Wijaya M; Wu E; Penney TB
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2019 Jul; 14(7):727-735. PubMed ID: 31216037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Selective attention and multisensory integration: multiple phases of effects on the evoked brain activity.
    Talsma D; Woldorff MG
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Jul; 17(7):1098-114. PubMed ID: 16102239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.