These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32251696)

  • 1. Reproducibility of laboratory scanning of multiple implants in complete edentulous arch: Effect of scan bodies.
    Pan Y; Tam JMY; Tsoi JKH; Lam WYH; Pow EHN
    J Dent; 2020 May; 96():103329. PubMed ID: 32251696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of different digital scanning techniques and scan bodies for complete-arch implant-supported prostheses.
    Mizumoto RM; Yilmaz B; McGlumphy EA; Seidt J; Johnston WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 31040026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of scanner type and scan body position on the accuracy of complete-arch digital implant scans.
    Çakmak G; Yilmaz H; Treviño A; Kökat AM; Yilmaz B
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2020 Aug; 22(4):533-541. PubMed ID: 32643259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scanning accuracy with splinted and unsplinted implant scan bodies for the edentulous arch at implant level: an in vitro study.
    Garbacea A; Alqahtani AF; Goodacre B; Alhelal A; Lozada J; Kattadiyil MT
    J Oral Implantol; 2022 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 35816623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does the geometry of scan bodies affect the alignment accuracy of computer-aided design in implant digital workflow: An in vitro study?
    Pan Y; Tsoi JKH; Lam WYH; Chen Z; Pow EHN
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 Mar; 33(3):313-321. PubMed ID: 34971468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of scanning the palate and scan body position on the accuracy of complete-arch implant scans.
    Mizumoto RM; Alp G; Özcan M; Yilmaz B
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2019 Oct; 21(5):987-994. PubMed ID: 31347253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of laboratory scanner accuracy by a novel calibration block for complete-arch implant rehabilitation.
    Pan Y; Tam JM; Tsoi JK; Lam WY; Huang R; Chen Z; Pow EH
    J Dent; 2020 Nov; 102():103476. PubMed ID: 32961260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving intraoral implant scanning with a novel auxiliary device: An in-vitro study.
    Pan Y; Tsoi JKH; Lam WY; Zhao K; Pow EH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Dec; 32(12):1466-1473. PubMed ID: 34545614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of different artificial landmarks and scanning patterns on the complete-arch implant intraoral digital scans.
    Kanjanasavitree P; Thammajaruk P; Guazzato M
    J Dent; 2022 Oct; 125():104266. PubMed ID: 35995084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Novel Method to Evaluate Precision of Optical Implant Impressions with Commercial Scan Bodies-An Experimental Approach.
    Fluegge T; Att W; Metzger M; Nelson K
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Jan; 26(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 26466158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of Scan Pattern on the Accuracy of Complete-Arch Digital Implant Impressions with Two Intraoral Scanners.
    Li Z; Huang R; Wu X; Chen Z; Huang B; Chen Z
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(4):731-739. PubMed ID: 35904829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of scanned area on the accuracy and time of anterior single implant scans: An in vitro study.
    Yilmaz B; Rizzo Marques V; Guo X; Gouveia D; Abou-Ayash S
    J Dent; 2021 Jun; 109():103620. PubMed ID: 33647374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Implant Impressions: Effect of Interimplant Distance in an Edentulous Arch.
    Tan MY; Yee SHX; Wong KM; Tan YH; Tan KBC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(2):366–380. PubMed ID: 30521661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improved scanning accuracy with newly designed scan bodies: An in vitro study comparing digital versus conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation.
    Huang R; Liu Y; Huang B; Zhang C; Chen Z; Li Z
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Jul; 31(7):625-633. PubMed ID: 32181919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The cumulative effect of error in the digital workflow for complete-arch implant-supported frameworks: An in vitro study.
    Pan Y; Tsoi JKH; Lam WYH; Zhao K; Pow EHN
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 Sep; 33(9):886-899. PubMed ID: 35770363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of splinting scan bodies on trueness of complete-arch implant impression using different intraoral scanners: an in vitro study.
    Retana L; Nejat AH; Pozzi A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2023 Feb; 26(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 35072425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro and in vivo accuracy of full-arch digital implant impressions.
    Rutkunas V; Gedrimiene A; Akulauskas M; Fehmer V; Sailer I; Jegelevicius D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Dec; 32(12):1444-1454. PubMed ID: 34543478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conventional open-tray impression versus intraoral digital scan for implant-level complete-arch impression.
    Kim KR; Seo KY; Kim S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Dec; 122(6):543-549. PubMed ID: 30955939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: An in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons.
    Renne W; Ludlow M; Fryml J; Schurch Z; Mennito A; Kessler R; Lauer A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 28024822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of Different Scan Bodies and Scan Strategies on the Accuracy of Digital Implant Impressions Assessed with an Intraoral Scanner: An In Vitro Study.
    Motel C; Kirchner E; Adler W; Wichmann M; Matta RE
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Apr; 29(4):309-314. PubMed ID: 31802574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.