These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32251738)

  • 21. Two dosing regimens for preinduction cervical priming with intravaginal dinoprostone pessary: a randomised clinical trial.
    Tan LK; Tay SK
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Sep; 106(9):907-12. PubMed ID: 10492100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cervical ripening and labor induction with a controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert: a meta-analysis.
    Sanchez-Ramos L; Kaunitz AM; Delke I; Gaudier FL
    Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Nov; 94(5 Pt 2):878-83. PubMed ID: 10546777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Can we predict successful cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 vaginal inserts?
    Hiersch L; Borovich A; Gabbay-Benziv R; Maimon-Cohen M; Aviram A; Yogev Y; Ashwal E
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Feb; 295(2):343-349. PubMed ID: 27928676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A mathematical model to predict mean time to delivery following cervical ripening with dinoprostone vaginal insert.
    Levast F; Legendre G; Hachem HE; Saulnier P; Descamps P; Gillard P; Bouet PE
    Sci Rep; 2019 Jul; 9(1):9910. PubMed ID: 31289277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Is the Bishop-score significant in predicting the success of labor induction in multiparous women?
    Navve D; Orenstein N; Ribak R; Daykan Y; Shechter-Maor G; Biron-Shental T
    J Perinatol; 2017 May; 37(5):480-483. PubMed ID: 28181995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Double-balloon catheter vs. dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix.
    Du C; Liu Y; Liu Y; Ding H; Zhang R; Tan J
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Jun; 291(6):1221-7. PubMed ID: 25408273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of two preparations of dinoprostone for pre-induction of labour in nulliparous women with very unfavourable cervical condition: a randomised clinical trial.
    Facchinetti F; Venturini P; Verocchi G; Volpe A
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Apr; 119(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 15808378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Comparative efficacy of vaginal insert and dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening at term in current practice].
    Denoual-Ziad C; Hors Y; Delande I; Lezin B; Herlicoviez M; Dreyfus M
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2005 Feb; 34(1 Pt 1):62-8. PubMed ID: 15767919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Uterine hyperstimulation following cervix ripening with dinoprostone in a vaginal insert system].
    Brouwers JM; Briët JW; Brouwers JR
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2004 Jun; 148(26):1300-3. PubMed ID: 15279216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Pregnancy outcomes after failed cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 followed by Foley balloon catheter.
    Mizrachi Y; Levy M; Weiner E; Bar J; Barda G; Kovo M
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Oct; 29(19):3229-33. PubMed ID: 26572735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of intracervical Foley catheter used alone or combined with a single dose of dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening: a randomised study.
    Chowdhary A; Bagga R; Jasvinder Kalra ; Jain V; Saha SC; Kumar P
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 May; 39(4):461-467. PubMed ID: 30747025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparison of misoprostol, controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert and oxytocin for cervical ripening.
    Silfeler DB; Tandogan B; Ayvaci H; Silfeler I; Yenidede I; Dayicioglu V
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Dec; 284(6):1331-7. PubMed ID: 21290140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Vaginal Dinoprostone Versus Intravenous Oxytocin for Labor Induction in Patients Not Responsive to a First Dose of Dinoprostone: A Randomized Prospective Study.
    Antonazzo P; Laoreti A; Personeni C; Grossi E; Martinelli A; Cetin I
    Reprod Sci; 2016 Jun; 23(6):779-84. PubMed ID: 26626794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Predictor Factors in the Success of Slow-Release Dinoprostone Used for Cervical Ripening in Pregnancies with Premature Rupture of Membranes.
    Obut M; Aynaoğlu Yıldız G; Bademkıran MH; Oğlak SC; Yücel Çelik Ö; Ölmez F
    Eurasian J Med; 2022 Feb; 54(1):72-76. PubMed ID: 35307633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparative study of titrated oral misoprostol solution and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term pregnancy.
    Wang X; Yang A; Ma Q; Li X; Qin L; He T
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Sep; 294(3):495-503. PubMed ID: 26746850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies complicated by late fetal growth restriction undergoing induction of labor with dinoprostone compared with cervical balloon: A retrospective, international study.
    Di Mascio D; Villalain C; Rizzo G; Morales‐Rosello J; Sileo FG; Maruotti GM; Prefumo F; Galindo A; D'Antonio F;
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Jul; 100(7):1313-1321. PubMed ID: 33792924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
    Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of perinatal outcomes between controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal delivery system (PROPESS) and metreurynter for cervical ripening in labor induction: A retrospective single-center study in Japan.
    Yamaguchi M; Takakura S; Enomoto N; Teishikata Y; Kitamura A; Maki S; Tanaka K; Maezawa T; Tanaka H; Ikeda T
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2021 Dec; 47(12):4256-4262. PubMed ID: 34545652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Induction of labor in patients with an unfavorable cervix after a cesarean using an osmotic dilator versus vaginal prostaglandin.
    Maier JT; Metz M; Watermann N; Li L; Schalinski E; Gauger U; Rath W; Hellmeyer L
    J Perinat Med; 2018 Apr; 46(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 28672756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Clinical significances of Bishop score and vaginal bleeding to controlled-release dinoprostone delivery system (PROPESS) efficacy for cervical ripening: A retrospective single-center study in Japan.
    Imai K; Aoki C; Tano S; Iitani Y; Nakamura N; Ushida T; Kajiyama H; Kotani T
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 Apr; 49(4):1154-1160. PubMed ID: 36746752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.