These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32252498)

  • 1. Validity and Reliability of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 36-Item Persian Version for Persons with Multiple Sclerosis.
    Salehi R; Negahban H; Khiavi FF; Saboor S; Majdinasab N; Shakhi K
    Korean J Fam Med; 2020 May; 41(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 32252498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Psychometric properties of the world health organization disability assessment schedule II -12 Item (WHODAS II) in trauma patients.
    Abedzadeh-Kalahroudi M; Razi E; Sehat M; Asadi-Lari M
    Injury; 2016 May; 47(5):1104-8. PubMed ID: 26710706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of the World Health Organization Assessment Schedule II Chinese Traditional Version (WHODAS II CT) in persons with disabilities and chronic illnesses for Chinese population.
    Cheung MK; Hung AT; Poon PK; Fong DY; Li LS; Chow ES; Qiu ZY; Liou TH
    Disabil Rehabil; 2015; 37(20):1902-7. PubMed ID: 25495681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of traditional Chinese version of World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 36--item (WHODAS 2.0) in Taiwan: validity and reliability analyses.
    Chiu TY; Yen CF; Chou CH; Lin JD; Hwang AW; Liao HF; Chi WC
    Res Dev Disabil; 2014 Nov; 35(11):2812-20. PubMed ID: 25094056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHODAS-II) in patients with multiple sclerosis.
    Magistrale G; Pisani V; Argento O; Incerti CC; Bozzali M; Cadavid D; Caltagirone C; Medori R; DeLuca J; Nocentini U
    Mult Scler; 2015 Apr; 21(4):448-56. PubMed ID: 25092769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development and validation of the World Health Organization disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) Indonesian version in stroke survivors.
    Yuliana S; Muslih M; Sim J; Vidyanti AN; Brahmadhi A; Tsai HT
    Disabil Rehabil; 2022 Aug; 44(16):4459-4466. PubMed ID: 33745407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Psychometric properties of the 12-item WHODAS applied through phone survey: an experience in PERSIAN Traffic Cohort.
    Shahedifar N; Sadeghi-Bazargani H; Asghari-Jafarabadi M; Farahbakhsh M; Bazargan-Hejazi S
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2022 Jul; 20(1):106. PubMed ID: 35810300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Psychometric evaluation of the WHODAS 2.0 and prevalence of disability in a Swedish general population.
    Norén P; Karlsson J; Ohlsson-Nevo E; Möller M; Hermansson L
    J Patient Rep Outcomes; 2023 Apr; 7(1):36. PubMed ID: 37020121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cross-cultural adaptation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) for Hebrew-speaking subjects with and without hand injury.
    Marom BS; Carel RS; Sharabi M; Ratzon NZ
    Disabil Rehabil; 2017 Jun; 39(12):1155-1161. PubMed ID: 27291062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adapting World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 for Nepal.
    Risal A; Kunwar D; Karki E; Adhikari SP; Bimali I; Shrestha B; Khadka S; Holen A
    BMC Psychol; 2021 Mar; 9(1):45. PubMed ID: 33731222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule in people with severe mental disorders in rural Ethiopia.
    Habtamu K; Alem A; Medhin G; Fekadu A; Dewey M; Prince M; Hanlon C
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Apr; 15(1):64. PubMed ID: 28381230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Validity and Reliability of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in Turkish Psychiatry Patients and Healthy Controls].
    Aslan Kunt D; Dereboy F
    Turk Psikiyatri Derg; 2018; 29(4):248-257. PubMed ID: 30887475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Translation, Validity, and Reliability of the Persian Version of the Aging Voice Index.
    Ahmadi A; Hosseinifar S; Faham M; Shahramnia MM; Ebadi A; Etter NM; Shiani A; Dehghan M
    J Voice; 2021 Mar; 35(2):327.e13-327.e21. PubMed ID: 31635900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Activity limitation and participation restrictions of breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: psychometric properties and validation of the Chinese version of the WHODAS 2.0.
    Zhao HP; Liu Y; Li HL; Ma L; Zhang YJ; Wang J
    Qual Life Res; 2013 May; 22(4):897-906. PubMed ID: 22684528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability and validity of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 in patients with Kashin-Beck disease.
    Younus MI; Wang DM; Yu FF; Fang H; Guo X
    Rheumatol Int; 2017 Sep; 37(9):1567-1573. PubMed ID: 28439626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) for individuals with asthma.
    de Souza CCC; Zacarias LC; Campos NG; Fortaleza SCB; Madeira CA; Sousa Almondes JG; Leite CF
    Disabil Rehabil; 2024 Sep; ():1-8. PubMed ID: 39264096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validity and reliability of the Persian version of the multiple sclerosis quality of life questionnaire.
    Ghaem H; Borhani Haghighi A; Jafari P; Nikseresht AR
    Neurol India; 2007; 55(4):369-75. PubMed ID: 18040110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability and validity of the Brazilian version of the world health organization disability assessment schedule (WHODAS 2.0) questionnaire for women with urinary incontinence.
    Moura ACR; Rocha RO; Araujo AKDS; Castro SS; Moreira MA; Nascimento SLD
    Disabil Rehabil; 2024 Mar; ():1-6. PubMed ID: 38465521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Persian version of Community Integration Questionnaire in persons with multiple sclerosis: translation, reliability, validity, and factor analysis.
    Negahban H; Fattahizadeh P; Ghasemzadeh R; Salehi R; Majdinasab N; Mazaheri M
    Disabil Rehabil; 2013 Aug; 35(17):1453-9. PubMed ID: 23330593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the Japanese version of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule-2 in preoperative patients.
    Ida M; Naito Y; Tanaka Y; Matsunari Y; Inoue S; Kawaguchi M
    J Anesth; 2017 Aug; 31(4):539-544. PubMed ID: 28378206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.