BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32252627)

  • 1. A qualitative transcriptional signature to reclassify histological grade of ER-positive breast cancer patients.
    Li J; Jiang W; Liang Q; Liu G; Dai Y; Zheng H; Yang J; Cai H; Zheng G
    BMC Genomics; 2020 Apr; 21(1):283. PubMed ID: 32252627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determining breast cancer histological grade from RNA-sequencing data.
    Wang M; Klevebring D; Lindberg J; Czene K; Grönberg H; Rantalainen M
    Breast Cancer Res; 2016 May; 18(1):48. PubMed ID: 27165105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prognostic breast cancer signature identified from 3D culture model accurately predicts clinical outcome across independent datasets.
    Martin KJ; Patrick DR; Bissell MJ; Fournier MV
    PLoS One; 2008 Aug; 3(8):e2994. PubMed ID: 18714348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An ER-associated miRNA signature predicts prognosis in ER-positive breast cancer.
    Zhou X; Wang X; Huang Z; Xu L; Zhu W; Liu P
    J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2014 Nov; 33(1):94. PubMed ID: 25373603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Homogeneous datasets of triple negative breast cancers enable the identification of novel prognostic and predictive signatures.
    Karn T; Pusztai L; Holtrich U; Iwamoto T; Shiang CY; Schmidt M; Müller V; Solbach C; Gaetje R; Hanker L; Ahr A; Liedtke C; Ruckhäberle E; Kaufmann M; Rody A
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(12):e28403. PubMed ID: 22220191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gene expression profiling in breast cancer: understanding the molecular basis of histologic grade to improve prognosis.
    Sotiriou C; Wirapati P; Loi S; Harris A; Fox S; Smeds J; Nordgren H; Farmer P; Praz V; Haibe-Kains B; Desmedt C; Larsimont D; Cardoso F; Peterse H; Nuyten D; Buyse M; Van de Vijver MJ; Bergh J; Piccart M; Delorenzi M
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Feb; 98(4):262-72. PubMed ID: 16478745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A novel MAPK-microRNA signature is predictive of hormone-therapy resistance and poor outcome in ER-positive breast cancer.
    Miller PC; Clarke J; Koru-Sengul T; Brinkman J; El-Ashry D
    Clin Cancer Res; 2015 Jan; 21(2):373-85. PubMed ID: 25370469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Five-Gene-Pair-Based Prognostic Signature for Predicting the Relapse Risk of Early Stage ER+ Breast Cancer.
    Li N; Cai H; Song K; Guo Y; Liang Q; Zhang J; Chen R; Li J; Wang X; Guo Z
    Front Genet; 2020; 11():566928. PubMed ID: 33193655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Expression profiling of ion channel genes predicts clinical outcome in breast cancer.
    Ko JH; Ko EA; Gu W; Lim I; Bang H; Zhou T
    Mol Cancer; 2013 Sep; 12(1):106. PubMed ID: 24053408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prognostic significance in breast cancer of a gene signature capturing stromal PDGF signaling.
    Frings O; Augsten M; Tobin NP; Carlson J; Paulsson J; Pena C; Olsson E; Veerla S; Bergh J; Ostman A; Sonnhammer EL
    Am J Pathol; 2013 Jun; 182(6):2037-47. PubMed ID: 23583284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Meta-analysis and gene set enrichment relative to er status reveal elevated activity of MYC and E2F in the "basal" breast cancer subgroup.
    Alles MC; Gardiner-Garden M; Nott DJ; Wang Y; Foekens JA; Sutherland RL; Musgrove EA; Ormandy CJ
    PLoS One; 2009; 4(3):e4710. PubMed ID: 19270750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genomic grade adds prognostic value in invasive lobular carcinoma.
    Metzger-Filho O; Michiels S; Bertucci F; Catteau A; Salgado R; Galant C; Fumagalli D; Singhal SK; Desmedt C; Ignatiadis M; Haussy S; Finetti P; Birnbaum D; Saini KS; Berlière M; Veys I; de Azambuja E; Bozovic I; Peyro-Saint-Paul H; Larsimont D; Piccart M; Sotiriou C
    Ann Oncol; 2013 Feb; 24(2):377-384. PubMed ID: 23028037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Histological grade as an alternative to the Ki67 labeling index is only available for luminal-type breast cancers.
    Hayashi S; Kitada M; Sato K; Matsuda Y; Ishibashi K; Oikawa K; Miyokawa N; Hirata S
    Breast Cancer; 2014 Jan; 21(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 22467403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fuzzy logic selection as a new reliable tool to identify molecular grade signatures in breast cancer--the INNODIAG study.
    Kempowsky-Hamon T; Valle C; Lacroix-Triki M; Hedjazi L; Trouilh L; Lamarre S; Labourdette D; Roger L; Mhamdi L; Dalenc F; Filleron T; Favre G; François JM; Le Lann MV; Anton-Leberre V
    BMC Med Genomics; 2015 Feb; 8():3. PubMed ID: 25888889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Distinct p53 gene signatures are needed to predict prognosis and response to chemotherapy in ER-positive and ER-negative breast cancers.
    Coutant C; Rouzier R; Qi Y; Lehmann-Che J; Bianchini G; Iwamoto T; Hortobagyi GN; Symmans WF; Uzan S; Andre F; de Thé H; Pusztai L
    Clin Cancer Res; 2011 Apr; 17(8):2591-601. PubMed ID: 21248301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Aging impacts transcriptomes but not genomes of hormone-dependent breast cancers.
    Yau C; Fedele V; Roydasgupta R; Fridlyand J; Hubbard A; Gray JW; Chew K; Dairkee SH; Moore DH; Schittulli F; Tommasi S; Paradiso A; Albertson DG; Benz CC
    Breast Cancer Res; 2007; 9(5):R59. PubMed ID: 17850661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. EndoPredict predicts for the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.
    Bertucci F; Finetti P; Viens P; Birnbaum D
    Cancer Lett; 2014 Dec; 355(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 25218596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Histological grade in breast cancer: association with clinical and biological features in a series of 229 patients.
    Ruibal A; Arias JI; Del Río MC; Lapeña G; Schneider J; Tejerina A
    Int J Biol Markers; 2001; 16(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 11288957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An individualized prognostic signature for gastric cancer patients treated with 5-Fluorouracil-based chemotherapy and distinct multi-omics characteristics of prognostic groups.
    Li X; Cai H; Zheng W; Tong M; Li H; Ao L; Li J; Hong G; Li M; Guan Q; Yang S; Yang D; Lin X; Guo Z
    Oncotarget; 2016 Feb; 7(8):8743-55. PubMed ID: 26840027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pseudogene-gene functional networks are prognostic of patient survival in breast cancer.
    Smerekanych S; Johnson TS; Huang K; Zhang Y
    BMC Med Genomics; 2020 Apr; 13(Suppl 5):51. PubMed ID: 32241256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.