These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3225355)

  • 1. Some remarks on Pastore (1988).
    Watson CS; Kewley-Port D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Dec; 84(6):2266-70. PubMed ID: 3225355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Burying straw men in imaginary graves: a reply to Kewley-Port, Watson, and Foyle (1988).
    Pastore RE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Dec; 84(6):2262-70. PubMed ID: 3225354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Individual differences in the processing of speech and nonspeech sounds by normal-hearing listeners.
    Surprenant AM; Watson CS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2085-95. PubMed ID: 11681386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory temporal acuity in relation to category boundaries; speech and nonspeech stimuli.
    Kewley-Port D; Watson CS; Foyle DC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Mar; 83(3):1133-45. PubMed ID: 3356818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the interpretability of speech/nonspeech comparisons: a reply to Fowler.
    Diehl RL; Walsh MA; Kluender KR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jun; 89(6):2905-9. PubMed ID: 1918630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptual similarity between piano notes: Simulations with a template-based perception model.
    Osses Vecchi A; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 May; 149(5):3534. PubMed ID: 34241098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Envelope and intensity based prediction of psychoacoustic masking and speech intelligibility.
    Biberger T; Ewert SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Aug; 140(2):1023. PubMed ID: 27586734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The near non-existence of "pure" energetic masking release for speech: Extension to spectro-temporal modulation and glimpsing.
    Stone MA; Canavan S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Aug; 140(2):832. PubMed ID: 27586715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contributions of comodulation masking release and temporal resolution to the speech-reception threshold masked by an interfering voice.
    Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Sep; 94(3 Pt 1):1295-300. PubMed ID: 8408970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modeling auditory processing of amplitude modulation. II. Spectral and temporal integration.
    Dau T; Kollmeier B; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Nov; 102(5 Pt 1):2906-19. PubMed ID: 9373977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Revision and validation of a binaural model for speech intelligibility in noise.
    Jelfs S; Culling JF; Lavandier M
    Hear Res; 2011 May; 275(1-2):96-104. PubMed ID: 21156201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An addendum to "Effects of Noise on Speech Production: Acoustic and Perceptual Analyses" [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84, 917-928 (1988)].
    Summers WV; Johnson K; Pisoni DB; Bernacki RH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Nov; 86(5):1717-21. PubMed ID: 2808921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A frequency-selective feedback model of auditory efferent suppression and its implications for the recognition of speech in noise.
    Clark NR; Brown GJ; Jürgens T; Meddis R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1535-41. PubMed ID: 22978882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A simulation framework for auditory discrimination experiments: Revealing the importance of across-frequency processing in speech perception.
    Schädler MR; Warzybok A; Ewert SD; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2708. PubMed ID: 27250164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The mutual roles of temporal glimpsing and vocal characteristics in cocktail-party listening.
    Vestergaard MD; Fyson NR; Patterson RD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):429-39. PubMed ID: 21786910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The development of frequency resolution in humans as revealed by the auditory brain-stem response recorded with notched-noise masking.
    Abdala C; Folsom RC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Aug; 98(2 Pt 1):921-30. PubMed ID: 7642831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The intelligibility of Lombard speech for non-native listeners.
    Cooke M; Lecumberri ML
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1120-9. PubMed ID: 22894231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of various modes of presenting sentence materials in tests of speech perception in noise.
    Theodoridis GC; Schoeny ZG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Dec; 84(6):2270-2. PubMed ID: 3225356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of reverberant self- and overlap-masking on speech recognition in cochlear implant listeners.
    Desmond JM; Collins LM; Throckmorton CS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jun; 135(6):EL304-10. PubMed ID: 24907838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of perceived spatial separation on informational masking of Chinese speech.
    Wu X; Wang C; Chen J; Qu H; Li W; Wu Y; Schneider BA; Li L
    Hear Res; 2005 Jan; 199(1-2):1-10. PubMed ID: 15574295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.