These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3225375)

  • 1. Clinical evaluations of composite resin restorations in primary molars: a 4-year follow-up study.
    Tonn EM; Ryge G
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1988 Oct; 117(5):603-6. PubMed ID: 3225375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Two-year clinical evaluation of light-cured composite resin restorations in primary molars.
    Tonn EM; Ryge G
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1985 Jul; 111(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 3897334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Composite restorations for primary molars: results after four years.
    Oldenburg TR; Vann WF; Dilley DC
    Pediatr Dent; 1987 Jun; 9(2):136-43. PubMed ID: 3475683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing composite resin wear in primary molars: four-year findings.
    Vann WF; Barkmeier WW; Mahler DB
    J Dent Res; 1988 May; 67(5):876-9. PubMed ID: 2966821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of composite resin tunnel restorations on primary molars.
    de Freitas AR; de Andrada MA; Baratieri LN; Monteiro Júnior S; de Sousa CN
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Jun; 25(6):419-24. PubMed ID: 7938431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Proximal wear rates by tooth position of resin composite restorations.
    Wendt SL; Ziemiecki TL; Leinfelder KF
    J Dent; 1996; 24(1-2):33-9. PubMed ID: 8636490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A 5- and 8-year clinical evaluation of a posterior composite resin.
    Barnes DM; Blank LW; Thompson VP; Holston AM; Gingell JC
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Feb; 22(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 2068249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tunnel restorations. A 3 1/2-year follow up study of Class I and II tunnel restorations in permanent and primary teeth.
    Hasselrot L
    Swed Dent J; 1993; 17(5):173-82. PubMed ID: 8291027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of finishing on the in vivo wear rate of a posterior composite resin.
    Ratanapridakul K; Leinfelder KF; Thomas J
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1989 Mar; 118(3):333-5. PubMed ID: 2921432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A clinical review of preventive resin restorations.
    Walker JD; Jensen ME; Pinkham JR
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1990; 57(4):257-9. PubMed ID: 2197305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results.
    Casagrande L; Dalpian DM; Ardenghi TM; Zanatta FB; Balbinot CE; García-Godoy F; De Araujo FB
    Am J Dent; 2013 Dec; 26(6):351-5. PubMed ID: 24640441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Management of extensive carious lesions in permanent molars of a child with nonmetallic bonded restorations--a case report.
    el-Mowafy O
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2000 Jun; 66(6):302-7. PubMed ID: 10927895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings.
    da Rosa Rodolpho PA; Cenci MS; Donassollo TA; Loguércio AD; Demarco FF
    J Dent; 2006 Aug; 34(7):427-35. PubMed ID: 16314023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Saucer-shaped cavity preparation for composite resin restorations in class II carious lesions: three-year results.
    Nordbo H; Leirskar J; von der Fehr FR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Feb; 69(2):155-9. PubMed ID: 8429508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Randomized, controlled trial comparing the retention of a flowable restorative system with a conventional resin sealant: one-year follow up.
    Corona SA; Borsatto MC; Garcia L; Ramos RP; Palma-Dibb RG
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2005 Jan; 15(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 15663444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Class II restorations with a polyacid-modified composite resin in primary molars placed in a dental practice: results of a two-year clinical evaluation.
    Attin T; Opatowski A; Meyer C; Zingg-Meyer B; Mönting JS
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):259-64. PubMed ID: 11203828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite.
    Attin T; Opatowski A; Meyer C; Zingg-Meyer B; Buchalla W; Mönting JS
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 11572292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Micro-CT for measuring marginal leakage of Class II resin composite restorations in primary molars prepared in vivo.
    Eden E; Topaloglu-Ak A; Cuijpers V; Frencken JE
    Am J Dent; 2008 Dec; 21(6):393-7. PubMed ID: 19146134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vivo occlusal wear of posterior composite restorations.
    Lewis G
    Oper Dent; 1991; 16(2):61-9. PubMed ID: 1803330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer cement in Class II restorations in primary molars--a three year clinical evaluation.
    Ostlund J; Möller K; Koch G
    Swed Dent J; 1992; 16(3):81-6. PubMed ID: 1496459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.