156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32255418)
1. Specific Absorption Rate and Specific Energy Dose: Comparison of 1.5-T versus 3.0-T Fetal MRI.
Barrera CA; Francavilla ML; Serai SD; Edgar JC; Jaimes C; Gee MS; Roberts TPL; Otero HJ; Adzick NS; Victoria T
Radiology; 2020 Jun; 295(3):664-674. PubMed ID: 32255418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison Between 1.5-T and 3-T MRI for Fetal Imaging: Is There an Advantage to Imaging With a Higher Field Strength?
Victoria T; Johnson AM; Edgar JC; Zarnow DM; Vossough A; Jaramillo D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jan; 206(1):195-201. PubMed ID: 26700352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fetal MRI at 3 T: Principles to Optimize Success.
Machado-Rivas F; Cortes-Albornoz MC; Afacan O; Bedoya MA; Calixto C; Choi JJ; Ruggiero M; Gholipour A; Jaimes C
Radiographics; 2023 Apr; 43(4):e220141. PubMed ID: 36995947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fetal MRI of CNS abnormalities.
Masselli G; Vaccaro Notte MR; Zacharzewska-Gondek A; Laghi F; Manganaro L; Brunelli R
Clin Radiol; 2020 Aug; 75(8):640.e1-640.e11. PubMed ID: 32349872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MRI of the foetal brain using a rapid 3D steady-state sequence.
Griffiths PD; Jarvis D; McQuillan H; Williams F; Paley M; Armitage P
Br J Radiol; 2013 Oct; 86(1030):20130168. PubMed ID: 24043616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Magnetic resonance imaging versus ultrasonography in fetal pathology.
Perrone A; Savelli S; Maggi C; Di Pietro L; Di Maurizio M; Tesei J; Ballesio L; De Felice C; Giancotti A; Di Iorio R; Manganaro L
Radiol Med; 2008 Mar; 113(2):225-41. PubMed ID: 18386124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability and Feasibility of Low-Field-Strength Fetal MRI at 0.55 T during Pregnancy.
Aviles Verdera J; Story L; Hall M; Finck T; Egloff A; Seed PT; Malik SJ; Rutherford MA; Hajnal JV; Tomi-Tricot R; Hutter J
Radiology; 2023 Oct; 309(1):e223050. PubMed ID: 37847139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. IDEAL 3D spoiled gradient echo of the articular cartilage of the knee on 3.0 T MRI: a comparison with conventional 3.0 T fast spin-echo T2 fat saturation image.
Han CH; Park HJ; Lee SY; Chung EC; Choi SH; Yun JS; Rho MH
Acta Radiol; 2015 Dec; 56(12):1479-86. PubMed ID: 25348476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of foetal multicystic dysplastic kidney.
Ji H; Dong SZ
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Nov; 108():128-132. PubMed ID: 30396644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score assessed with an isotropic three-dimensional true fast imaging with steady-state precession sequence at 3.0 Tesla.
Welsch GH; Zak L; Mamisch TC; Resinger C; Marlovits S; Trattnig S
Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):603-12. PubMed ID: 19692843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetal brain.
Tee LM; Kan EY; Cheung JC; Leung WC
Hong Kong Med J; 2016 Jun; 22(3):270-8. PubMed ID: 27101791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prenatal cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of right aortic arch with mirror image branching and retroesophageal left ductus arteriosus.
Dong SZ; Zhu M
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Apr; 32(7):1057-1062. PubMed ID: 29096572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing an accelerated 3D fast spin-echo sequence (CS-SPACE) for knee 3-T magnetic resonance imaging with traditional 3D fast spin-echo (SPACE) and routine 2D sequences.
Altahawi FF; Blount KJ; Morley NP; Raithel E; Omar IM
Skeletal Radiol; 2017 Jan; 46(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 27744578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. MR imaging of the fetal brain at 1.5T and 3.0T field strengths: comparing specific absorption rate (SAR) and image quality.
Krishnamurthy U; Neelavalli J; Mody S; Yeo L; Jella PK; Saleem S; Korzeniewski SJ; Cabrera MD; Ehterami S; Bahado-Singh RO; Katkuri Y; Haacke EM; Hernandez-Andrade E; Hassan SS; Romero R
J Perinat Med; 2015 Mar; 43(2):209-20. PubMed ID: 25324440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. T1-weighted fast fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery sequence (T1-FFLAIR) enables the visualization and quantification of fetal brain myelination in utero.
Milos RI; Schmidbauer V; Watzenboeck ML; Stuhr F; Gruber GM; Mitter C; Dovjak GO; Milković-Periša M; Kostovic I; Jovanov-Milošević N; Kasprian G; Prayer D
Eur Radiol; 2024 Jul; 34(7):4573-4584. PubMed ID: 38019312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Potential clinical benefits and limitations of fetal virtopsy using high-field MRI at 7 Tesla versus stereomicroscopic autopsy to assess first trimester fetuses.
Staicu A; Albu C; Popa-Stanila R; Chiriac L; Boitor-Borza D; Bondor C; Kovacs T; Caracostea G; Rotar IC; Turcu RVF; Simon S; Muresan D; Stamatian F
Prenat Diagn; 2019 Jun; 39(7):505-518. PubMed ID: 30980413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the articular cartilage of the knee joint with vastly undersampled isotropic projection reconstruction steady-state free precession imaging.
Kijowski R; Lu A; Block W; Grist T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jul; 24(1):168-75. PubMed ID: 16758476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fast fetal magnetic resonance imaging techniques.
Chen Q; Levine D
Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2001 Feb; 12(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 11215717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prenatal diagnosis of renal duplication by magnetic resonance imaging.
Ji H; Dong SZ
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Jul; 33(14):2342-2347. PubMed ID: 30572758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. MR imaging of the inner ear and cerebellopontine angle: comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional sequences.
Czerny C; Rand T; Gstoettner W; Woelfl G; Imhof H; Trattnig S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Mar; 170(3):791-6. PubMed ID: 9490977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
