183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32256119)
1. Comparing the Performance of Charlson and Elixhauser Comorbidity Indices to Predict In-Hospital Mortality Among a Chinese Population.
Cai M; Liu E; Zhang R; Lin X; Rigdon SE; Qian Z; Belue R; Chang JJ
Clin Epidemiol; 2020; 12():307-316. PubMed ID: 32256119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity indices with different weightings to predict in-hospital mortality: an analysis of national inpatient data.
Sharma N; Schwendimann R; Endrich O; Ausserhofer D; Simon M
BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Jan; 21(1):13. PubMed ID: 33407455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk adjustment performance of Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidities in ICD-9 and ICD-10 administrative databases.
Li B; Evans D; Faris P; Dean S; Quan H
BMC Health Serv Res; 2008 Jan; 8():12. PubMed ID: 18194561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Combining the Hospital Frailty Risk Score With the Charlson and Elixhauser Multimorbidity Indices to Identify Older Patients at Risk of Poor Outcomes in Acute Care.
Gilbert T; Cordier Q; Polazzi S; Street A; Conroy S; Duclos A
Med Care; 2024 Feb; 62(2):117-124. PubMed ID: 38079225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative evaluation of the clinical laboratory-based Intermountain risk score with the Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity indices for mortality prediction.
Snow GL; Bledsoe JR; Butler A; Wilson EL; Rea S; Majercik S; Anderson JL; Horne BD
PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0233495. PubMed ID: 32437416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the Elixhauser and Charlson/Deyo methods of comorbidity measurement in administrative data.
Southern DA; Quan H; Ghali WA
Med Care; 2004 Apr; 42(4):355-60. PubMed ID: 15076812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing the performance of the Charlson/Deyo and Elixhauser comorbidity measures across five European countries and three conditions.
Gutacker N; Bloor K; Cookson R
Eur J Public Health; 2015 Feb; 25 Suppl 1():15-20. PubMed ID: 25690125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of different comorbidity measures for use with administrative data in predicting short- and long-term mortality.
Chu YT; Ng YY; Wu SC
BMC Health Serv Res; 2010 May; 10():140. PubMed ID: 20507593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of the Combined Comorbidity Index of Charlson and Elixhauser to Predict 30-Day Mortality Across ICD-9 and ICD-10.
Simard M; Sirois C; Candas B
Med Care; 2018 May; 56(5):441-447. PubMed ID: 29578951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development and Validation of the Summary Elixhauser Comorbidity Score for Use With ICD-10-CM-Coded Data Among Older Adults.
Mehta HB; Li S; An H; Goodwin JS; Alexander GC; Segal JB
Ann Intern Med; 2022 Oct; 175(10):1423-1430. PubMed ID: 36095314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Elixhauser comorbidity method outperforms the Charlson index in predicting inpatient death after orthopaedic surgery.
Menendez ME; Neuhaus V; van Dijk CN; Ring D
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Sep; 472(9):2878-86. PubMed ID: 24867450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Elderly Patients With Cervical Spine Fractures: A Comparison of the Charlson and Elixhauser Comorbidity Measures.
Menendez ME; Ring D; Harris MB; Cha TD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jun; 40(11):809-15. PubMed ID: 25785957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Elixhauser outperformed Charlson comorbidity index in prognostic value after ACS: insights from a national registry.
Zhang F; Chiu Y; Ensor J; Mohamed MO; Peat G; Mamas MA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Jan; 141():26-35. PubMed ID: 34461210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inpatient mortality after orthopaedic surgery.
Menendez ME; Neuhaus V; Ring D
Int Orthop; 2015 Jul; 39(7):1307-14. PubMed ID: 25711395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the performance of the CMS Hierarchical Condition Category (CMS-HCC) risk adjuster with the Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity measures in predicting mortality.
Li P; Kim MM; Doshi JA
BMC Health Serv Res; 2010 Aug; 10():245. PubMed ID: 20727154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative Performance of Comorbidity Measures in Predicting Health Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Zhan ZW; Chen YA; Dong YH
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis; 2020; 15():335-344. PubMed ID: 32103932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combining Charlson and Elixhauser scores with varying lookback predicated mortality better than using individual scores.
Pritchard E; Fawcett N; Quan TP; Crook D; Peto TE; Walker AS
J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Feb; 130():32-41. PubMed ID: 33002637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance of comorbidity measures for predicting outcomes in population-based osteoporosis cohorts.
Lix LM; Quail J; Teare G; Acan B
Osteoporos Int; 2011 Oct; 22(10):2633-43. PubMed ID: 21305268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A modification of the Elixhauser comorbidity measures into a point system for hospital death using administrative data.
van Walraven C; Austin PC; Jennings A; Quan H; Forster AJ
Med Care; 2009 Jun; 47(6):626-33. PubMed ID: 19433995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A disease-specific comorbidity index for predicting mortality in patients admitted to hospital with a cardiac condition.
Azzalini L; Chabot-Blanchet M; Southern DA; Nozza A; Wilton SB; Graham MM; Gravel GM; Bluteau JP; Rouleau JL; Guertin MC; Jolicoeur EM
CMAJ; 2019 Mar; 191(11):E299-E307. PubMed ID: 30885968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
