These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32256536)

  • 1. Ultrasonic frogs call at a higher pitch in noisier ambiance.
    Zhang F; Chen P; Chen Z; Zhao J
    Curr Zool; 2015 Dec; 61(6):996-1003. PubMed ID: 32256536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Lombard effect in male ultrasonic frogs: Regulating antiphonal signal frequency and amplitude in noise.
    Shen JX; Xu ZM
    Sci Rep; 2016 Jun; 6():27103. PubMed ID: 27345957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ultrasonic frogs show hyperacute phonotaxis to female courtship calls.
    Shen JX; Feng AS; Xu ZM; Yu ZL; Arch VS; Yu XJ; Narins PM
    Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7197):914-6. PubMed ID: 18469804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ultrasonic communication in frogs.
    Feng AS; Narins PM; Xu CH; Lin WY; Yu ZL; Qiu Q; Xu ZM; Shen JX
    Nature; 2006 Mar; 440(7082):333-6. PubMed ID: 16541072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Male antiphonal calls and phonotaxis evoked by female courtship calls in the large odorous frog (Odorrana graminea).
    Shen JX; Xu ZM; Narins PM
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2023 Jan; 209(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 35939131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Little effect of natural noise on high-frequency hearing in frogs, Odorrana tormota.
    Liu J; Yang H; Hu GL; Li S; Xu ZM; Qi Z; Shen JX
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2015 Oct; 201(10):1029-34. PubMed ID: 26260392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Heterogeneity of vocal sac inflation patterns in Odorrana tormota plays a role in call diversity.
    Zhang F; Zhao J; Chen P; Chen Z; Chen Y; Feng AS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Mar; 139(3):1018-23. PubMed ID: 27036239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Vocalizations of female frogs contain nonlinear characteristics and individual signatures.
    Zhang F; Zhao J; Feng AS
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0174815. PubMed ID: 28358859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. DPOAEs and tympanal membrane vibrations reveal adaptations of the sexually dimorphic ear of the concave-eared torrent frog, Odorrana tormota.
    Cobo-Cuan A; Feng AS; Zhang F; Narins PM
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2023 Jan; 209(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 36104577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Calling at the highway: The spatiotemporal constraint of road noise on Pacific chorus frog communication.
    Nelson DV; Klinck H; Carbaugh-Rutland A; Mathis CL; Morzillo AT; Garcia TS
    Ecol Evol; 2017 Jan; 7(1):429-440. PubMed ID: 28070305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ultrasonic frogs show extraordinary sex differences in auditory frequency sensitivity.
    Shen JX; Xu ZM; Yu ZL; Wang S; Zheng DZ; Fan SC
    Nat Commun; 2011 Jun; 2():342. PubMed ID: 21673663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative transcriptome analysis provides insights into the molecular mechanisms of high-frequency hearing differences between the sexes of Odorrana tormota.
    Chen Z; Liu Y; Liang R; Cui C; Zhu Y; Zhang F; Zhang J; Chen X
    BMC Genomics; 2022 Apr; 23(1):296. PubMed ID: 35410120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How the environment shapes animal signals: a test of the acoustic adaptation hypothesis in frogs.
    Goutte S; Dubois A; Howard SD; Márquez R; Rowley JJL; Dehling JM; Grandcolas P; Xiong RC; Legendre F
    J Evol Biol; 2018 Jan; 31(1):148-158. PubMed ID: 29150984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ultrasonic signalling by a Bornean frog.
    Arch VS; Grafe TU; Narins PM
    Biol Lett; 2008 Feb; 4(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 18029296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultrasonic communication in concave-eared torrent frogs (Amolops tormotus).
    Feng AS; Narins PM
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2008 Feb; 194(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 18228079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Torrent frogs emit acoustic signals of a narrower spectral range in habitats with longer-lasting biotic background noise.
    Forti LR; de Melo Sampaio MR; Pires CR; Szabo JK; Toledo LF
    Behav Processes; 2022 Aug; 200():104700. PubMed ID: 35798216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Frequency jumps and subharmonic components in calls of female Odorrana tormota differentially affect the vocal behaviors of male frogs.
    Wu Y; Luo X; Chen P; Zhang F
    Front Zool; 2023 Dec; 20(1):39. PubMed ID: 38062453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Males increase call frequency, not intensity, in response to noise, revealing no Lombard effect in the little torrent frog.
    Zhao L; Sun X; Chen Q; Yang Y; Wang J; Ran J; Brauth SE; Tang Y; Cui J
    Ecol Evol; 2018 Dec; 8(23):11733-11741. PubMed ID: 30598771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stream noise, hybridization, and uncoupled evolution of call traits in two lineages of poison frogs: Oophaga histrionica and Oophaga lehmanni.
    Vargas-Salinas F; Amézquita A
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(10):e77545. PubMed ID: 24194888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pure ultrasonic communication in an endemic Bornean frog.
    Arch VS; Grafe TU; Gridi-Papp M; Narins PM
    PLoS One; 2009; 4(4):e5413. PubMed ID: 19401782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.