These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32256556)

  • 1. Quantitative Evaluation of Visual Aesthetics of Human-Machine Interaction Interface Layout.
    Deng L; Wang G
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2020; 2020():9815937. PubMed ID: 32256556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Layout Design of Human-Machine Interaction Interface of Cabin Based on Cognitive Ergonomics and GA-ACA.
    Deng L; Wang G; Yu S
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2016; 2016():1032139. PubMed ID: 26884745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What Would a Graph Look Like in this Layout? A Machine Learning Approach to Large Graph Visualization.
    Kwon OH; Crnovrsanin T; Ma KL
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2018 Jan; 24(1):478-488. PubMed ID: 28866499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Engineering aesthetics and aesthetic ergonomics: theoretical foundations and a dual-process research methodology.
    Liu Y
    Ergonomics; 2003 Oct 20-Nov 15; 46(13-14):1273-92. PubMed ID: 14612319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Review of EEG and fMRI Measuring Aesthetic Processing in Visual User Experience Research.
    Rui Z; Gu Z
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2021; 2021():2070209. PubMed ID: 34956344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. And the nominees are: Using design-awards datasets to build computational aesthetic evaluation model.
    Xing B; Zhang K; Zhang L; Wu X; Si H; Zhang H; Zhu K; Sun S
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227754. PubMed ID: 31961909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Webpage aesthetics, performance and usability: design variables and their effects.
    Schmidt KE; Liu Y; Sridharan S
    Ergonomics; 2009 Jun; 52(6):631-43. PubMed ID: 19479580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cognitive Matching of Design Subjects in Product Form Evolutionary Design.
    Zhang S; Wang S; Zhou A; Liu S; Su J
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2021; 2021():8456736. PubMed ID: 34630555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fusion of multichannel local and global structural cues for photo aesthetics evaluation.
    Luming Zhang ; Yue Gao ; Zimmermann R; Qi Tian ; Xuelong Li
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2014 Mar; 23(3):1419-29. PubMed ID: 24723537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. HOLA: Human-like Orthogonal Network Layout.
    Kieffer S; Dwyer T; Marriott K; Wybrow M
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2016 Jan; 22(1):349-58. PubMed ID: 26390483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The rating consistency of aesthetic preferences for icon-background color combinations.
    Huang SM
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Jan; 43(1):141-50. PubMed ID: 21530941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Application of EEG and Interactive Evolutionary Design Method in Cultural and Creative Product Design.
    Deng L; Wang G
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2019; 2019():1860921. PubMed ID: 30733799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of system aesthetics on trust, cooperation, satisfaction and annoyance in an imperfect automated system.
    Weinstock A; Oron-Gilad T; Parmet Y
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():258-65. PubMed ID: 22316732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Classified diagnosis and treatment scheme of oral cosmetic restoration based on aesthetic analysis (part Ⅱ): Chinese aesthetic connotation and analysis scheme.
    Yu H; Zhao J; Sun M
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2024 Apr; 42(2):154-162. PubMed ID: 38597075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Design simplicity influences patient portal use: the role of aesthetic evaluations for technology acceptance.
    Lazard AJ; Watkins I; Mackert MS; Xie B; Stephens KK; Shalev H
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2016 Apr; 23(e1):e157-61. PubMed ID: 26635314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Implicit Aesthetic Preference for Mobile Marketing Interface Layout-An ERP Study.
    Wang S; Xu C; Xiao L; Ding AS
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2021; 15():728895. PubMed ID: 34658818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application Optimization of University Aesthetic Education Resources Based on Few-Shot Learning from the Perspective of Ecological Aesthetic Education.
    Liu Y
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():4248778. PubMed ID: 35498167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Shaping the aesthetical landscape by using image statistics measures.
    Bertacchini F; Pantano PS; Bilotta E
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2022 Apr; 224():103530. PubMed ID: 35168145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Workplace aesthetics: Impact of environments upon employee health?
    Schell E; Theorell T; Saraste H
    Work; 2011; 39(3):203-13. PubMed ID: 21709357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An intelligent optimization method for highway route selection based on comprehensive weight and TOPSIS.
    Liu C; Wang Q; Cao Z
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(2):e0262588. PubMed ID: 35213560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.