These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32257331)

  • 1. Fluid-structure interaction simulations outperform computational fluid dynamics in the description of thoracic aorta haemodynamics and in the differentiation of progressive dilation in Marfan syndrome patients.
    Pons R; Guala A; Rodríguez-Palomares JF; Cajas JC; Dux-Santoy L; Teixidó-Tura G; Molins JJ; Vázquez M; Evangelista A; Martorell J
    R Soc Open Sci; 2020 Feb; 7(2):191752. PubMed ID: 32257331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Aortic hemodynamics assessment prior and after valve sparing reconstruction: A patient-specific 4D flow-based FSI model.
    Nannini G; Caimi A; Palumbo MC; Saitta S; Girardi LN; Gaudino M; Roman MJ; Weinsaft JW; Redaelli A
    Comput Biol Med; 2021 Aug; 135():104581. PubMed ID: 34174756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Decreased rotational flow and circumferential wall shear stress as early markers of descending aorta dilation in Marfan syndrome: a 4D flow CMR study.
    Guala A; Teixido-Tura G; Dux-Santoy L; Granato C; Ruiz-Muñoz A; Valente F; Galian-Gay L; Gutiérrez L; González-Alujas T; Johnson KM; Wieben O; Sao Avilés A; Evangelista A; Rodriguez-Palomares J
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2019 Oct; 21(1):63. PubMed ID: 31607265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of Numerical Simulations of Thoracic Aorta Hemodynamics: Comparison with In Vivo Measurements and Stochastic Sensitivity Analysis.
    Boccadifuoco A; Mariotti A; Capellini K; Celi S; Salvetti MV
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2018 Dec; 9(4):688-706. PubMed ID: 30357714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of Peak Wall Stress in an Ascending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Using FSI Simulations: Effects of Aortic Stiffness and Peripheral Resistance.
    Campobasso R; Condemi F; Viallon M; Croisille P; Campisi S; Avril S
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2018 Dec; 9(4):707-722. PubMed ID: 30341731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Imaging-Based 4D Aortic Pressure Mapping in Marfan Syndrome Patients: A Matched Case-Control Study.
    Leidenberger T; Gordon Y; Farag M; Delles M; Fava Sanches A; Fink MA; Kallenbach K; Kauczor HU; Rengier F
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2020 May; 109(5):1434-1440. PubMed ID: 31568745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of numerical simulation methods in aortic arch using 4D Flow MRI.
    Miyazaki S; Itatani K; Furusawa T; Nishino T; Sugiyama M; Takehara Y; Yasukochi S
    Heart Vessels; 2017 Aug; 32(8):1032-1044. PubMed ID: 28444501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of Aortic Dilation on the Regional Aortic Stiffness of Bicuspid Aortic Valve Assessed by 4-Dimensional Flow Cardiac Magnetic Resonance: Comparison With Marfan Syndrome and Degenerative Aortic Aneurysm.
    Guala A; Rodriguez-Palomares J; Dux-Santoy L; Teixido-Tura G; Maldonado G; Galian L; Huguet M; Valente F; Gutiérrez L; González-Alujas T; Johnson KM; Wieben O; Sao Avilés A; Garcia-Dorado D; Evangelista A
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Jun; 12(6):1020-1029. PubMed ID: 29778849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of 4D-Flow MRI spatial resolution on patient-specific CFD simulations of the thoracic aorta.
    Cherry M; Khatir Z; Khan A; Bissell M
    Sci Rep; 2022 Sep; 12(1):15128. PubMed ID: 36068322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Flow-sensitive four-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging: flow patterns in ascending aortic aneurysms.
    Weigang E; Kari FA; Beyersdorf F; Luehr M; Etz CD; Frydrychowicz A; Harloff A; Markl M
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2008 Jul; 34(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 18515137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ascending thoracic aorta aneurysm repair induces positive hemodynamic outcomes in a patient with unchanged bicuspid aortic valve.
    Condemi F; Campisi S; Viallon M; Croisille P; Fuzelier JF; Avril S
    J Biomech; 2018 Nov; 81():145-148. PubMed ID: 30340762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Data-driven generation of 4D velocity profiles in the aneurysmal ascending aorta.
    Saitta S; Maga L; Armour C; Votta E; O'Regan DP; Salmasi MY; Athanasiou T; Weinsaft JW; Xu XY; Pirola S; Redaelli A
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 May; 233():107468. PubMed ID: 36921465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computational analysis of aortic haemodynamics in the presence of ascending aortic aneurysm.
    Petuchova A; Maknickas A
    Technol Health Care; 2022; 30(1):187-200. PubMed ID: 34806632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fluid-structure interaction modeling of abdominal aortic aneurysms: the impact of patient-specific inflow conditions and fluid/solid coupling.
    Chandra S; Raut SS; Jana A; Biederman RW; Doyle M; Muluk SC; Finol EA
    J Biomech Eng; 2013 Aug; 135(8):81001. PubMed ID: 23719760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Geometry and flow in ascending aortic aneurysms are influenced by left ventricular outflow tract orientation: Detecting increased wall shear stress on the outer curve of proximal aortic aneurysms.
    Salmasi MY; Pirola S; Mahuttanatan S; Fisichella SM; Sengupta S; Jarral OA; Oo A; O'Regan D; Xu XY; Athanasiou T
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2023 Jul; 166(1):11-21.e1. PubMed ID: 34217540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    van Andel MM; van Ooij P; de Waard V; Gottwald LM; van Kimmenade RRJ; Scholte AJ; Dickinson MG; Zwinderman AH; Mulder BJM; Nederveen AJ; Groenink M
    Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc; 2022 Dec; 43():101128. PubMed ID: 36268203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fluid-structure interaction simulations of patient-specific aortic dissection.
    Bäumler K; Vedula V; Sailer AM; Seo J; Chiu P; Mistelbauer G; Chan FP; Fischbein MP; Marsden AL; Fleischmann D
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2020 Oct; 19(5):1607-1628. PubMed ID: 31993829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patient-Specific Bicuspid Aortic Valve Biomechanics: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Integrated Fluid-Structure Interaction Approach.
    Emendi M; Sturla F; Ghosh RP; Bianchi M; Piatti F; Pluchinotta FR; Giese D; Lombardi M; Redaelli A; Bluestein D
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2021 Feb; 49(2):627-641. PubMed ID: 32804291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of anesthesia and fluid-structure interaction on simulated shear stress patterns in the carotid bifurcation of mice.
    De Wilde D; Trachet B; De Meyer G; Segers P
    J Biomech; 2016 Sep; 49(13):2741-2747. PubMed ID: 27342001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the nonlinear relationship between wall shear stress topology and multi-directionality in coronary atherosclerosis.
    Carpenter HJ; Ghayesh MH; Zander AC; Psaltis PJ
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 Apr; 231():107418. PubMed ID: 36842347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.