127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32257781)
1. A comparative evaluation of compressive strength and antimicrobial efficacy of Fuji IX and Amalgomer CR: An in vitro study.
Gautam E; Somani R; Jaidka S; Hussain S
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2020; 10(2):118-121. PubMed ID: 32257781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An in-vitro evaluation of antibacterial effect of Amalgomer CR and Fuji VII against bacteria causing severe early childhood caries.
Bariker RH; Mandroli PS
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 26838144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength and microleakage of tricalcium silicate-based restorative material and radioopaque posterior glass ionomer restorative cement in primary and permanent teeth: an in vitro study.
Raju VG; Venumbaka NR; Mungara J; Vijayakumar P; Rajendran S; Elangovan A
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2014; 32(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 25231038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of antibacterial activity of three different glass ionomer cements on streptococcus mutans: an in-vitro antimicrobial study.
Khere CH; Hiremath H; Sandesh N; Misar P; Gorie N
Med Pharm Rep; 2019 Jul; 92(3):288-293. PubMed ID: 31460512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative evaluation of the physical properties of a reinforced glass ionomer dental restorative material.
Moshaverinia M; Navas A; Jahedmanesh N; Shah KC; Moshaverinia A; Ansari S
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Aug; 122(2):154-159. PubMed ID: 31326149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative Evaluation of Compressive Strength of Self-cure, Dual-cure, and Light-cure Glass Ionomer Cements in a Simulated Oral Environment: An
Chandru TP; Chandran S; Peedikayil FC; Kottayi S; Aparna TP; Aravind A
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2023; 16(5):707-710. PubMed ID: 38162236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Miswak-Infused Glass Ionomer Cement: A Comparative In Vitro Analysis of Antibacterial Efficacy and Compressive Strength.
Devi K; Paulraj J; Shanmugam R; Maiti S
Cureus; 2024 Feb; 16(2):e53484. PubMed ID: 38440002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Comparative In Vitro Analysis of Antimicrobial Effectiveness and Compressive Strength of Ginger and Clove-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement.
Paulraj J; Pushparathna B; Maiti S; Sharma N; Shanmugam R
Cureus; 2024 Mar; 16(3):e55964. PubMed ID: 38601383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How do the surface coating and one-year water aging affect the properties of fluoride-releasing restorative materials?
Ugurlu M
Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 May; 23(5):720-728. PubMed ID: 32367882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative evaluation of compressive strength, diametral tensile strength and shear bond strength of GIC type IX, chlorhexidine-incorporated GIC and triclosan-incorporated GIC: An in vitro study.
Jaidka S; Somani R; Singh DJ; Shafat S
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2016 Apr; 6(Suppl 1):S64-9. PubMed ID: 27195231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative evaluation of the antibacterial and physical properties of conventional glass ionomer cement containing chlorhexidine and antibiotics.
Mittal S; Soni H; Sharma DK; Mittal K; Pathania V; Sharma S
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2015; 5(4):268-75. PubMed ID: 26310885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles and Cetylpyridinium Chloride Enriched Glass-Ionomer Restorative Cement: A Comparative Study Assessing Compressive Strength and Antibacterial Activity.
Hamid N; Telgi RL; Tirth A; Tandon V; Chandra S; Chaturvedi RK
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2019; 43(1):42-45. PubMed ID: 30289369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Comparative In Vitro Analysis of Antimicrobial Effectiveness and Compressive Resilience in Chirata and Terminalia arjuna Modified Glass Ionomer Cement.
Devi K; Paulraj J; George RS; Shanmugam R; Maiti S
Cureus; 2024 Jan; 16(1):e52198. PubMed ID: 38347981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of heat on the mechanical properties of glass ionomer cements.
Kuter B; Eden E; Yildiz H
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Jun; 14(2):90-4. PubMed ID: 23758455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Properties of Glass Ionomer Cements with and without Chlorhexidine Gluconate.
Yadiki JV; Jampanapalli SR; Konda S; Inguva HC; Chimata VK
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 9(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 27365927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Physico-mechanical properties of a fast-set highly viscous GIC restorative.
Yap AU; Pek YS; Cheang P
J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Jan; 30(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 12485377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative Evaluation of the Antibacterial Efficacy of Type II Glass lonomer Cement, Type IX Glass lonomer Cement, and AMALGOMER™ Ceramic Reinforcement by Modified "Direct Contact Test": An in vitro Study.
Hugar SM; Assudani HG; Patil V; Kukreja P; Uppin C; Thakkar P
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 9(2):114-7. PubMed ID: 27365930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Antimicrobial properties, compressive strength and fluoride release capacity of essential oil-modified glass ionomer cements-an in vitro study.
Sherief DI; Fathi MS; Abou El Fadl RK
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Apr; 25(4):1879-1888. PubMed ID: 32803440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Energy dispersive X-ray microanalysis, fluoride release, and antimicrobial properties of glass ionomer cements indicated for atraumatic restorative treatment.
Saxena S; Tiwari S
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2016; 6(4):366-72. PubMed ID: 27583226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A clinical evaluation of two glass ionomer cements in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment technique in India: 1 year follow up.
Deepa G; Shobha T
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2010 Nov; 20(6):410-8. PubMed ID: 20642467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
