These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32258977)

  • 1. Postoperative complications of minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Ozawa S; Koyanagi K; Ninomiya Y; Yatabe K; Higuchi T
    Ann Gastroenterol Surg; 2020 Mar; 4(2):126-134. PubMed ID: 32258977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Clinical observation on perioperative complications of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis and minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy].
    Zhou JM; Jing SJ; Lu QT; Chu X; Xue T
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2022 Jun; 44(6):577-580. PubMed ID: 35754233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. McKeown or Ivor Lewis totally minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    van Workum F; Berkelmans GH; Klarenbeek BR; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Luyer MDP; Rosman C
    J Thorac Dis; 2017 Jul; 9(Suppl 8):S826-S833. PubMed ID: 28815080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of short-term outcomes between Ivor-Lewis and McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Zhai C; Liu Y; Li W; Xu T; Yang G; Lu H; Hu D
    J Thorac Dis; 2015 Dec; 7(12):2352-8. PubMed ID: 26793358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer according to the location of the tumor: Experience of 251 patients.
    Chen L; Liu X; Wang R; Wang Y; Zhang T; Gao D; Gao L
    Ann Med Surg (Lond); 2017 May; 17():54-60. PubMed ID: 28417001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown.
    Brown AM; Pucci MJ; Berger AC; Tatarian T; Evans NR; Rosato EL; Palazzo F
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):204-211. PubMed ID: 28643075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Short-term efficacy comparison between Ivor-Lewis approach and McKeown approach in minimally invasive esophagectomy].
    Lin J; Kang M; Lin J; Chen S; Deng F; Han W; Lin R
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Sep; 17(9):888-91. PubMed ID: 25273657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. McKeown or Ivor Lewis minimally invasive esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Wang J; Hu J; Zhu D; Wang K; Gao C; Shan T; Yang Y
    Transl Cancer Res; 2020 Mar; 9(3):1518-1527. PubMed ID: 35117499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Versus Minimally Invasive Mckeown Esophagectomy.
    van Workum F; Slaman AE; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Kouwenhoven EA; van Det MJ; van den Wildenberg FJH; Polat F; Luyer MDP; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Rosman C
    Ann Surg; 2020 Jan; 271(1):128-133. PubMed ID: 30102633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
    Tagkalos E; Goense L; Hoppe-Lotichius M; Ruurda JP; Babic B; Hadzijusufovic E; Kneist W; van der Sluis PC; Lang H; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 Apr; 33(4):. PubMed ID: 31206577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Clinical Efficacy Between Da Vinci Robot-Assisted Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy and McKeown Esophagectomy for Middle and Lower Thoracic Esophageal Cancer: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Study.
    Hong Z; Cui B; Wang K; Bai X; Yang N; Zhang Y; Wu X; Cheng T; Jin D; Zhao J; Gou Y
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2023 Dec; 30(13):8271-8277. PubMed ID: 37698668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparison of short-term outcomes between minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy and Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer].
    Peng X; Chen Y; Nassor Juma A; Wang Y; Zhou Y; Jiao Y; Zhang W; Zhuang W
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2017 May; 42(5):546-552. PubMed ID: 28626101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients.
    Luketich JD; Pennathur A; Awais O; Levy RM; Keeley S; Shende M; Christie NA; Weksler B; Landreneau RJ; Abbas G; Schuchert MJ; Nason KS
    Ann Surg; 2012 Jul; 256(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 22668811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: Meticulous surgery minimizing postoperative complications.
    Hosoda K; Niihara M; Harada H; Yamashita K; Hiki N
    Ann Gastroenterol Surg; 2020 Nov; 4(6):608-617. PubMed ID: 33319150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of short-term outcomes between minimally invasive McKeown and Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal or junctional cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Deng J; Su Q; Ren Z; Wen J; Xue Z; Zhang L; Chu X
    Onco Targets Ther; 2018; 11():6057-6069. PubMed ID: 30275710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Techniques and short-term outcomes for total minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophageal resection in distal esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers: pooled data from six European centers.
    Straatman J; van der Wielen N; Nieuwenhuijzen GA; Rosman C; Roig J; Scheepers JJ; Cuesta MA; Luyer MD; van Berge Henegouwen MI; van Workum F; Gisbertz SS; van der Peet DL
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Jan; 31(1):119-126. PubMed ID: 27129563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perioperative management and outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy: case study of a high-volume tertiary center in Taiwan.
    Chang T; Hsiao PN; Tsai MY; Huang PM; Cheng YJ
    J Thorac Dis; 2018 Mar; 10(3):1670-1676. PubMed ID: 29707319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimally invasive esophagectomy via Sweet approach in combination with cervical mediastinoscopy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a case series.
    Wang W; Zhang B; Li X; Wu J; Wu Z; Ding Y; Yang D; Tang J; Su M; Ma J; You X; Liang J; Zhou Y
    Int J Surg Oncol (N Y); 2017 Dec; 2(11):e45. PubMed ID: 29302639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Essential updates 2020/2021: Recent topics in surgery and perioperative therapy for esophageal cancer.
    Ozawa S; Uchi Y; Ando T; Hayashi K; Aoki T
    Ann Gastroenterol Surg; 2023 May; 7(3):346-357. PubMed ID: 37152779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative Perioperative Outcomes by Esophagectomy Surgical Technique.
    Meredith KL; Maramara T; Blinn P; Lee D; Huston J; Shridhar R
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2020 Jun; 24(6):1261-1268. PubMed ID: 31197697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.