These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32259278)
1. Negative outcomes in critical care trials: applying the wrong statistics - or asking the wrong questions? Charlesworth M; Pandit JJ Anaesthesia; 2020 Oct; 75(10):1284-1288. PubMed ID: 32259278 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Are most randomised trials in anaesthesia and critical care wrong? An analysis using Bayes' theorem. Sidebotham D Anaesthesia; 2020 Oct; 75(10):1386-1393. PubMed ID: 32255517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bayes and health care research. Allmark P Med Health Care Philos; 2004; 7(3):321-32. PubMed ID: 15679024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Negative Trials, and What to Do with Them?: First, Stop Calling Them "Negative". Sessler DI Anesthesiology; 2020 Feb; 132(2):221-224. PubMed ID: 31939837 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The case for frequentism in clinical trials. Whitehead J Stat Med; 1993 Aug; 12(15-16):1405-13; discussion 1415-9. PubMed ID: 8248654 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Bayesian methodology for the design and interpretation of clinical trials in critical care medicine: a primer for clinicians. Kalil AC; Sun J Crit Care Med; 2014 Oct; 42(10):2267-77. PubMed ID: 25226118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Statistical reasoning in clinical trials: hypothesis testing. Kelen GD; Brown CG; Ashton J Am J Emerg Med; 1988 Jan; 6(1):52-61. PubMed ID: 3275456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Physiology versus evidence-based guidance for critical care practice. Gattinoni L; Carlesso E; Santini A Crit Care; 2015; 19 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S7. PubMed ID: 26729063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Study design synopsis: Battle in the stable: Bayesianism versus Frequentism. Detilleux J Equine Vet J; 2021 Mar; 53(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 33136311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Critical Evaluation of Data Requires Rigorous but Broadly Based Statistical Inference. Cox NJ; Below JE Circ Res; 2018 Apr; 122(8):1049-1051. PubMed ID: 29650629 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical research in the critical care environment. Berry DA Crit Care Med; 1993 Sep; 21(9 Suppl):S400-2. PubMed ID: 8365257 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Variables affecting outcomes in critical care trials: is prone positioning research exempt from these factors? Alviar CL; Cordova JP; Korniyenko A; Fried ED J Crit Care; 2010 Jun; 25(2):354-5. PubMed ID: 20381300 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Fragility and Reliability of Conclusions of Anesthesia and Critical Care Randomized Trials With Statistically Significant Findings: A Systematic Review. Grolleau F; Collins GS; Smarandache A; Pirracchio R; Gakuba C; Boutron I; Busse JW; Devereaux PJ; Le Manach Y Crit Care Med; 2019 Mar; 47(3):456-462. PubMed ID: 30394920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Probabilistic thinking and intensive care: a world view. Knaus WA Crit Care Med; 2004 May; 32(5):1231-2. PubMed ID: 15190982 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]