These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32259454)

  • 1. Hearing Aid Amplification Reduces Communication Effort of People With Hearing Impairment and Their Conversation Partners.
    Beechey T; Buchholz JM; Keidser G
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Apr; 63(4):1299-1311. PubMed ID: 32259454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hearing Impairment Increases Communication Effort During Conversations in Noise.
    Beechey T; Buchholz JM; Keidser G
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Jan; 63(1):305-320. PubMed ID: 31846598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Effects of Hearing-Aid Amplification and Noise on Conversational Dynamics Between Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Talkers.
    Petersen EB; MacDonald EN; Josefine Munch Sørensen A
    Trends Hear; 2022; 26():23312165221103340. PubMed ID: 35862280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An initial-fit comparison of two generic hearing aid prescriptive methods (NAL-NL2 and CAM2) to individuals having mild to moderately severe high-frequency hearing loss.
    Johnson EE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Feb; 24(2):138-50. PubMed ID: 23357807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combined effects of age and hearing impairment on utterances and requests for clarification in spontaneous conversation and a referential communication task.
    Ellis RJ; Rönnberg J; Plejert C
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2024; 59(1):293-303. PubMed ID: 37589337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.
    Shehorn J; Marrone N; Muller T
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28806193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the CAM2 and NAL-NL2 hearing aid fitting methods.
    Moore BC; Sęk A
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 22878351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of gain for adults from generic hearing aid prescriptive methods: impacts on predicted loudness, frequency bandwidth, and speech intelligibility.
    Johnson EE; Dillon H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):441-59. PubMed ID: 21993050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sentence recognition in noise and perceived benefit of noise reduction on the receiver and transmitter sides of a BICROS hearing aid.
    Oeding K; Valente M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):980-91. PubMed ID: 24384083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing AIDS.
    Shanks JE; Wilson RH; Larson V; Williams D
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 12195170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of hearing aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands.
    Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):523-34. PubMed ID: 23426091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transitioning hearing aid users with severe and profound loss to a new gain/frequency response: benefit, perception, and acceptance.
    Convery E; Keidser G
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Mar; 22(3):168-80. PubMed ID: 21545769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Eliciting Naturalistic Conversations: A Method for Assessing Communication Ability, Subjective Experience, and the Impacts of Noise and Hearing Impairment.
    Beechey T; Buchholz JM; Keidser G
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Feb; 62(2):470-484. PubMed ID: 30950689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigation of Extended Bandwidth Hearing Aid Amplification on Speech Intelligibility and Sound Quality in Adults with Mild-to-Moderate Hearing Loss.
    Seeto A; Searchfield GD
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Mar; 29(3):243-254. PubMed ID: 29488874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigation of hearing aid fitting according to the national acoustic laboratories' prescription for non-linear hearing aids and the desired sensation level methods in Japanese speakers: a crossover-controlled trial.
    Furuki S; Sano H; Kurioka T; Nitta Y; Umehara S; Hara Y; Yamashita T
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2023 Oct; 50(5):708-713. PubMed ID: 36792399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of presentation level on normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' acceptable speech and noise levels.
    Recker KL; Edwards BW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jan; 24(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 23231813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The relationship between listening conditions and alternative amplification schemes for multiple memory hearing aids.
    Keidser G
    Ear Hear; 1995 Dec; 16(6):575-86. PubMed ID: 8747807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the NAL Dynamic Conversations Test in older listeners with hearing loss.
    Best V; Keidser G; Freeston K; Buchholz JM
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 57(3):221-229. PubMed ID: 28826285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Self-Adjustment of Hearing Aid Amplification for Lower Speech Levels: Independent Ratings, Paired Comparisons, and Speech Recognition.
    Perry TT; Nelson PB
    Am J Audiol; 2022 Jun; 31(2):305-321. PubMed ID: 35316099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Effects of Hearing Aid Directional Microphone and Noise Reduction Processing on Listening Effort in Older Adults with Hearing Loss.
    Desjardins JL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jan; 27(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 26809324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.