184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32259645)
1. Using Interconnected Knotless Anchor for Suprapectoral Biceps Tenodesis Could Offer Improved Biomechanical Properties in a Cadaveric Model.
Kuan FC; Hsu KL; Yen JZ; Wen MJ; Yeh ML; Chen Y; Su WR
Arthroscopy; 2020 Aug; 36(8):2047-2054. PubMed ID: 32259645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical properties of suprapectoral biceps tenodesis: double knotless screw fixation is superior to single knotless screw fixation.
Hong CK; Chang CH; Chiang FL; Jou IM; Wang PH; Wang HN; Hsu KL; Kuan FC; Su WR
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2018 Aug; 138(8):1127-1134. PubMed ID: 29767346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical Analysis of All-Suture Suture Anchor Fixation Compared With Conventional Suture Anchors and Interference Screws for Biceps Tenodesis.
Frank RM; Bernardoni ED; Veera SS; Waterman BR; Griffin JW; Shewman EF; Cole BJ; Romeo AA; Verma NN
Arthroscopy; 2019 Jun; 35(6):1760-1768. PubMed ID: 31072716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical Evaluation of a Transtendinous All-Suture Anchor Technique Versus Interference Screw Technique for Suprapectoral Biceps Tenodesis in a Cadaveric Model.
Hong CK; Hsu KL; Kuan FC; Lin CL; Yeh ML; Su WR
Arthroscopy; 2018 Jun; 34(6):1755-1761. PubMed ID: 29482858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical evaluation of subpectoral biceps tenodesis: dual suture anchor versus interference screw fixation.
Tashjian RZ; Henninger HB
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2013 Oct; 22(10):1408-12. PubMed ID: 23415819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical Comparison of All-Suture Anchor Fixation and Interference Screw Technique for Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis.
Chiang FL; Hong CK; Chang CH; Lin CL; Jou IM; Su WR
Arthroscopy; 2016 Jul; 32(7):1247-52. PubMed ID: 27039966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical study comparing biceps wedge tenodesis with other proximal long head of the biceps tenodesis techniques.
Su WR; Budoff JE; Chiang CH; Lee CJ; Lin CL
Arthroscopy; 2013 Sep; 29(9):1498-505. PubMed ID: 23992987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical evaluation of open suture anchor fixation versus interference screw for biceps tenodesis.
Papp DF; Skelley NW; Sutter EG; Ji JH; Wierks CH; Belkoff SM; McFarland EG
Orthopedics; 2011 Jul; 34(7):e275-8. PubMed ID: 21717988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical characterization of unicortical button fixation: a novel technique for proximal subpectoral biceps tenodesis.
DeAngelis JP; Chen A; Wexler M; Hertz B; Grimaldi Bournissaint L; Nazarian A; Ramappa AJ
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2015 May; 23(5):1434-1441. PubMed ID: 24253375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Biceps Tenodesis Fixation Strengths: Fixation Type and Location Are Biomechanically Equivalent.
Dekker TJ; Peebles LA; Preuss FR; Goldenberg BT; Dornan GJ; Provencher MT
Arthroscopy; 2020 Dec; 36(12):3081-3091. PubMed ID: 32619605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical properties of suprapectoral biceps tenodesis with double-anchor knotless luggage tag sutures vs. subpectoral biceps tenodesis with single-anchor whipstitch suture using all-suture anchors.
Nicolay RW; Jahandar A; Retzky JS; Kontaxis A; Verma NN; Fu MC
JSES Int; 2023 Nov; 7(6):2393-2399. PubMed ID: 37969507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical comparison of arthroscopically performable techniques for suprapectoral biceps tenodesis.
Patzer T; Rundic JM; Bobrowitsch E; Olender GD; Hurschler C; Schofer MD
Arthroscopy; 2011 Aug; 27(8):1036-47. PubMed ID: 21704467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A biomechanical comparison of two arthroscopic suture techniques in biceps tenodesis: whip-stitch vs. simple suture techniques.
Agarwalla A; Puzzitiello RN; Leong NL; Shewman EF; Verma NN; Romeo AA; Forsythe B
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2019 Aug; 28(8):1531-1536. PubMed ID: 30948215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical comparison of two techniques for arthroscopic suprapectoral biceps tenodesis: interference screw versus implant-free intraosseous tendon fixation.
Sampatacos N; Getelman MH; Henninger HB
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2014 Nov; 23(11):1731-9. PubMed ID: 24810080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical comparison of the three techniques for arthroscopic suprapectoral biceps tenodesis: implant-free intraosseous tendon fixation with Cobra Guide, interference screw and suture anchor.
Poberaj B; Marjanovič B; Zupančič M; Nabergoj M; Cvetko E; Balažic M; Senekovič V
Musculoskelet Surg; 2020 Apr; 104(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 30762217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Suprapectoral or subpectoral position for biceps tenodesis: biomechanical comparison of four different techniques in both positions.
Patzer T; Santo G; Olender GD; Wellmann M; Hurschler C; Schofer MD
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2012 Jan; 21(1):116-25. PubMed ID: 21493102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biceps Tenodesis: Biomechanical Assessment of 3 Arthroscopic Suprapectoral Techniques.
Vestermark G; Hartigan D; Piasecki D; Fleischli J; Odum SM; Zheng N; D'Alessandro DF
Orthopedics; 2017 Nov; 40(6):e1009-e1016. PubMed ID: 28968479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transfer of the long head of biceps to the conjoint tendon. A biomechanical study.
Pastor MF; Kraemer M; Hurschler C; Claassen L; Wellmann M; Smith T
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2016 Feb; 32():80-4. PubMed ID: 26851565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The biomechanical evaluation of four fixation techniques for proximal biceps tenodesis.
Mazzocca AD; Bicos J; Santangelo S; Romeo AA; Arciero RA
Arthroscopy; 2005 Nov; 21(11):1296-306. PubMed ID: 16325079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Are Implant Choice and Surgical Approach Associated With Biceps Tenodesis Construct Strength? A Systematic Review and Meta-regression.
Aida HF; Shi BY; Huish EG; McFarland EG; Srikumaran U
Am J Sports Med; 2020 Apr; 48(5):1273-1280. PubMed ID: 31585053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
