These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3226236)

  • 1. Cervical spine MR imaging using multislice gradient echo imaging: comparison with cardiac gated spin echo.
    Kulkarni MV; Narayana PA; McArdle CB; Yeakley JW; Campagna NF; Wehrli FW
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1988; 6(5):517-25. PubMed ID: 3226236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison between magnetization transfer contrast and fast spin-echo MR imaging of degenerative disease of the cervical spine at 0.3 T.
    Yoshioka H; Onaya H; Itai Y; Nishimura H; Matsumura A; Tsunoda T; Kandatsu S; Koga M; Yoshikawa K; Kato H; Tsujii H
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1997; 15(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 9084023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of magnetization transfer for improved contrast on gradient-echo MR images of the cervical spine.
    Finelli DA; Hurst GC; Karaman BA; Simon JE; Duerk JL; Bellon EM
    Radiology; 1994 Oct; 193(1):165-71. PubMed ID: 8090886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of two MR sequences for the detection of multiple sclerosis lesions in the spinal cord.
    Lycklama à Nijeholt GJ; Barkhof F; Castelijns JA; van Waesberghe JH; Valk J; Jongen PJ; Hommes OR
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1996 Sep; 17(8):1533-8. PubMed ID: 8883653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cervical spine anatomy and pathologic processes. Applications of new MR imaging techniques.
    Czervionke LF; Daniels DL
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1988 Sep; 26(5):921-47. PubMed ID: 3420239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Magnetization transfer contrast imaging of the cervical spine at 0.3 T.
    Yoshioka H; Nishimura H; Masuda T; Nakajima K; Onaya H; Itai Y
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1994; 18(6):947-53. PubMed ID: 7962807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cervical spondylosis: three-dimensional gradient-echo MR with magnetization transfer.
    Melhem ER; Benson ML; Beauchamp NJ; Lee RR
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1996 Apr; 17(4):705-11. PubMed ID: 8730191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. BLADE Sequences in Transverse T2-weighted MR Imaging of the Cervical Spine. Cut-off for Artefacts?
    Finkenzeller T; Wendl CM; Lenhart S; Stroszczynski C; Schuierer G; Fellner C
    Rofo; 2015 May; 36(2):102-8. PubMed ID: 25912327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 3D MRI of the cervical spine: low flip angle FISP vs. Gd-DTPA TurboFLASH in degenerative disk disease.
    Ross JS; Ruggieri PM; Glicklich M; Obuchowski N; Dillinger J; Masaryk TJ; Qu Y; Modic MT
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1993; 17(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 8419435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of 2-D and 3-D FSE imaging in MR of the cervical spine.
    Swainson CJ; Hutchinson CE; Watson Y
    Clin Radiol; 1997 Mar; 52(3):194-7. PubMed ID: 9091253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cervical spine: MR imaging with a partial flip angle, gradient-refocused pulse sequence. Part II. Spinal cord disease.
    Enzmann DR; Rubin JB
    Radiology; 1988 Feb; 166(2):473-8. PubMed ID: 3336723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Low flip angle gradient echo magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine at 0.3 tesla.
    Holtås S; Ståhlberg F; Nilsson H; Larsson EM; Ericsson A
    Acta Radiol; 1989; 30(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 2775593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of MR and CT myelography in imaging the cervical and thoracic spine.
    Karnaze MG; Gado MH; Sartor KJ; Hodges FJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Feb; 150(2):397-403. PubMed ID: 3257332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A prospective comparison study of fast T1 weighted fluid attenuation inversion recovery and T1 weighted turbo spin echo sequence at 3 T in degenerative disease of the cervical spine.
    Ganesan K; Bydder GM
    Br J Radiol; 2014 Sep; 87(1041):20140091. PubMed ID: 25010068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparison of three-dimensional gradient echo, turbo spin echo and steady-state gradient echo sequences in axial MRI examination of the cervical spine].
    Mahmutyazicioğlu K; Ozdemir H; Savranlar A; Ozer T; Erdem O; Erdem Z; Gündoğdu S
    Tani Girisim Radyol; 2003 Dec; 9(4):432-8. PubMed ID: 14730951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 0.6 T MR imaging of the cervical spine: multislice and multiecho techniques.
    Hyman RA; Edwards JH; Vacirca SJ; Stein HL
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1985; 6(2):229-36. PubMed ID: 3920881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine in 27 dogs.
    Levitski RE; Lipsitz D; Chauvet AE
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 1999; 40(4):332-41. PubMed ID: 10463823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gradient-echo MR imaging of the cervical spine: evaluation of extradural disease.
    VanDyke C; Ross JS; Tkach J; Masaryk TJ; Modic MT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Aug; 153(2):393-8. PubMed ID: 2750626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Magnetic resonance imaging of diseased cervical and lumbar intervertebral discs].
    Kadoya S; Nakamura T; Takarada A; Yamamoto I; Sato S
    Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo); 1989 Feb; 29(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 2475812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Increased MR signal intensity secondary to chronic cervical cord compression.
    Takahashi M; Sakamoto Y; Miyawaki M; Bussaka H
    Neuroradiology; 1987; 29(6):550-6. PubMed ID: 3124018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.