373 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32262854)
21. Appreciable biosafety, biocompatibility and osteogenic capability of 3D printed nonstoichiometric wollastonite scaffolds favorable for clinical translation.
Wei Y; Wang Z; Lei L; Han J; Zhong S; Yang X; Gou Z; Chen L
J Orthop Translat; 2024 Mar; 45():88-99. PubMed ID: 38516038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Mechanically Strong Silica-Silk Fibroin Bioaerogel: A Hybrid Scaffold with Ordered Honeycomb Micromorphology and Multiscale Porosity for Bone Regeneration.
Maleki H; Shahbazi MA; Montes S; Hosseini SH; Eskandari MR; Zaunschirm S; Verwanger T; Mathur S; Milow B; Krammer B; Hüsing N
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2019 May; 11(19):17256-17269. PubMed ID: 31013056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Bone regeneration in 3D printing bioactive ceramic scaffolds with improved tissue/material interface pore architecture in thin-wall bone defect.
Shao H; Ke X; Liu A; Sun M; He Y; Yang X; Fu J; Liu Y; Zhang L; Yang G; Xu S; Gou Z
Biofabrication; 2017 Apr; 9(2):025003. PubMed ID: 28287077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effect of self-assembled nanofibrous silk/polycaprolactone layer on the osteoconductivity and mechanical properties of biphasic calcium phosphate scaffolds.
Roohani-Esfahani SI; Lu ZF; Li JJ; Ellis-Behnke R; Kaplan DL; Zreiqat H
Acta Biomater; 2012 Jan; 8(1):302-12. PubMed ID: 22023750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Biofunctional Ionic-Doped Calcium Phosphates: Silk Fibroin Composites for Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffolding.
Pina S; Canadas RF; Jiménez G; Perán M; Marchal JA; Reis RL; Oliveira JM
Cells Tissues Organs; 2017; 204(3-4):150-163. PubMed ID: 28803246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Protein-inorganic hybrid porous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.
Lu M; Sun L; Yao J; Zhao B; Liu Y; Shao Z; Chen X
J Mater Chem B; 2022 Aug; 10(34):6546-6556. PubMed ID: 36000545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Investigating the mechanical, physiochemical and osteogenic properties in gelatin-chitosan-bioactive nanoceramic composite scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration: In vitro and in vivo.
Dasgupta S; Maji K; Nandi SK
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2019 Jan; 94():713-728. PubMed ID: 30423758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Towards functional 3D-stacked electrospun composite scaffolds of PHBV, silk fibroin and nanohydroxyapatite: Mechanical properties and surface osteogenic differentiation.
Paşcu EI; Cahill PA; Stokes J; McGuinness GB
J Biomater Appl; 2016 Apr; 30(9):1334-49. PubMed ID: 26767394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Biocompatibility and osteogenesis of biomimetic Bioglass-Collagen-Phosphatidylserine composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.
Xu C; Su P; Chen X; Meng Y; Yu W; Xiang AP; Wang Y
Biomaterials; 2011 Feb; 32(4):1051-8. PubMed ID: 20980051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Surface modification of 3D-printed porous scaffolds via mussel-inspired polydopamine and effective immobilization of rhBMP-2 to promote osteogenic differentiation for bone tissue engineering.
Lee SJ; Lee D; Yoon TR; Kim HK; Jo HH; Park JS; Lee JH; Kim WD; Kwon IK; Park SA
Acta Biomater; 2016 Aug; 40():182-191. PubMed ID: 26868173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Silk-based anisotropical 3D biotextiles for bone regeneration.
Ribeiro VP; Silva-Correia J; Nascimento AI; da Silva Morais A; Marques AP; Ribeiro AS; Silva CJ; Bonifácio G; Sousa RA; Oliveira JM; Oliveira AL; Reis RL
Biomaterials; 2017 Apr; 123():92-106. PubMed ID: 28161684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cobalt-doped bioceramic scaffolds fabricated by 3D printing show enhanced osteogenic and angiogenic properties for bone repair.
Li J; Zhao C; Liu C; Wang Z; Ling Z; Lin B; Tan B; Zhou L; Chen Y; Liu D; Zou X; Liu W
Biomed Eng Online; 2021 Jul; 20(1):70. PubMed ID: 34303371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Novel 3D scaffold with enhanced physical and cell response properties for bone tissue regeneration, fabricated by patterned electrospinning/electrospraying.
Hejazi F; Mirzadeh H
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2016 Sep; 27(9):143. PubMed ID: 27550014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The design of strut/TPMS-based pore geometries in bioceramic scaffolds guiding osteogenesis and angiogenesis in bone regeneration.
Li Y; Li J; Jiang S; Zhong C; Zhao C; Jiao Y; Shen J; Chen H; Ye M; Zhou J; Yang X; Gou Z; Xu S; Shen M
Mater Today Bio; 2023 Jun; 20():100667. PubMed ID: 37273795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Structure-property relationships of silk-modified mesoporous bioglass scaffolds.
Wu C; Zhang Y; Zhu Y; Friis T; Xiao Y
Biomaterials; 2010 May; 31(13):3429-38. PubMed ID: 20122721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cell proliferation and migration in silk fibroin 3D scaffolds.
Mandal BB; Kundu SC
Biomaterials; 2009 May; 30(15):2956-65. PubMed ID: 19249094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Mesoporous bioactive glass-coated 3D printed borosilicate bioactive glass scaffolds for improving repair of bone defects.
Qi X; Wang H; Zhang Y; Pang L; Xiao W; Jia W; Zhao S; Wang D; Huang W; Wang Q
Int J Biol Sci; 2018; 14(4):471-484. PubMed ID: 29725268
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The effects of pore architecture in silk fibroin scaffolds on the growth and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells expressing BMP7.
Zhang Y; Fan W; Ma Z; Wu C; Fang W; Liu G; Xiao Y
Acta Biomater; 2010 Aug; 6(8):3021-8. PubMed ID: 20188872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of the biodegradation rate controlled by pore structures in magnesium phosphate ceramic scaffolds on bone tissue regeneration in vivo.
Kim JA; Lim J; Naren R; Yun HS; Park EK
Acta Biomater; 2016 Oct; 44():155-67. PubMed ID: 27554019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Bone regeneration on macroporous aqueous-derived silk 3-D scaffolds.
Kim HJ; Kim UJ; Leisk GG; Bayan C; Georgakoudi I; Kaplan DL
Macromol Biosci; 2007 May; 7(5):643-55. PubMed ID: 17477447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
