These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32265403)

  • 1. The Impact of Age on Perioperative Complications After Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.
    Edge P; Barletta K; Patnam R; Geller EJ
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Jun; 27(6):351-355. PubMed ID: 32265403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A National Contemporary Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes for Vaginal Vault Prolapse: Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Versus Nonmesh Vaginal Surgery.
    Linder BJ; Gershman B; Bews KA; Glasgow AE; Occhino JA
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(5):342-346. PubMed ID: 30628947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perioperative adverse events after minimally invasive abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
    Unger CA; Paraiso MF; Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Ridgeway B
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 211(5):547.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Healthcare Resource Utilization Following Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy: Impact of Concomitant Rectopexy.
    Lua-Mailland LL; Stanley EE; Yao M; Paraiso MFR; Wallace SL; Ferrando CA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2024 May; 35(5):1001-1010. PubMed ID: 38416154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Readmission and emergency department visits after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy and vaginal apical pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
    Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):552.e1-552.e7. PubMed ID: 34437864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
    Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of age on complications in women undergoing minimally invasive sacral colpopexy.
    Turner LC; Kantartzis K; Lowder JL; Shepherd JP
    Int Urogynecol J; 2014 Sep; 25(9):1251-6. PubMed ID: 24797942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perioperative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Based on Route of Concurrent Hysterectomy: A Secondary Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
    Cardenas-Trowers O; Stewart JR; Meriwether KV; Francis SL; Gupta A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(4):953-958. PubMed ID: 31404710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. National Assessment of Advancing Age on Perioperative Morbidity and Length of Stay Associated With Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.
    Chaudhry Z; Cohen SA; Tarnay C
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(6):482-485. PubMed ID: 27636219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes, Readmission, and Reoperation for Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation, Uterosacral Ligament Suspension, and Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.
    Yadav GS; Gaddam N; Rahn DD
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Mar; 27(3):133-139. PubMed ID: 33620894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perioperative, postoperative and anatomical outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy.
    Kilic GS; Lee T; Lewis K; Demirkiran C; Dursun F; Unlu BS
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 May; 41(4):651-654. PubMed ID: 33045854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of age in women undergoing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: A retrospective study.
    Malekzadeh M; Ramirez-Caban L; Garcia-Ruiz N; Ossin DA; Hurtado EA
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2024 Mar; 164(3):1117-1124. PubMed ID: 37794775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. RCT of vaginal extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament suspension (VEULS) with anterior mesh versus sacrocolpopexy: 4-year outcome.
    Ow LL; Lim YN; Lee J; Murray C; Thomas E; Leitch A; Rosamilia A; Dwyer PL
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Nov; 29(11):1607-1614. PubMed ID: 29961110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy surgical outcomes with prior versus concomitant hysterectomy.
    Dubinskaya A; Hernandez-Aranda D; Wakefield DB; Shepherd JP
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Feb; 31(2):401-407. PubMed ID: 31256223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adverse outcomes after minimally invasive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse in women 65 years and older in the United States.
    Bretschneider CE; Scales CD; Osazuwa-Peters O; Sheyn D; Sung V
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Sep; 33(9):2409-2418. PubMed ID: 35662357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse in the elderly: safety and outcomes.
    Sato H; Abe H; Ikeda A; Miyagawa T; Sato K; Tsukada S
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Jan; 42(1):110-115. PubMed ID: 33890540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perioperative Complications in Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Versus Transvaginal Mesh in the Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Analysis of a National Multi-institutional Dataset.
    Kisby CK; Occhino JA; Bews KA; Habermann EB; Linder BJ
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Feb; 27(2):72-77. PubMed ID: 31094716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of BMI on clinical outcomes following minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.
    Patnam R; Husk K; Sripad A; Barletta K; Dieter A; Geller EJ
    J Robot Surg; 2021 Feb; 15(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 32300933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy with 24-hour hospital stay for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
    Moscatiello P; Carracedo D; Sánchez MD; Gimbernat H; San Román J; Barba R; Durán M; Sánchez M
    Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2019 Nov; 43(9):509-514. PubMed ID: 31202593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Voiding function after sacrocolpopexy versus native tissue transvaginal repair for apical pelvic organ prolapse in an ERAS era: A retrospective cohort study.
    El Haraki AS; Burns J; Crafton CL; Parker-Autry C; Matthews CA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Jul; 33(7):1999-2004. PubMed ID: 34586441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.