These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32265987)

  • 1. Quantifying the Error of Secondary vs. Distant Primary Calibrations in a Simulated Environment.
    Powell CLE; Waskin S; Battistuzzi FU
    Front Genet; 2020; 11():252. PubMed ID: 32265987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Consequences of Secondary Calibrations on Divergence Time Estimates.
    Schenk JJ
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0148228. PubMed ID: 26824760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Data-driven speciation tree prior for better species divergence times in calibration-poor molecular phylogenies.
    Tao Q; Barba-Montoya J; Kumar S
    Bioinformatics; 2021 Jul; 37(Suppl_1):i102-i110. PubMed ID: 34252953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Molecular timetrees using relaxed clocks and uncertain phylogenies.
    Barba-Montoya J; Sharma S; Kumar S
    Front Bioinform; 2023; 3():1225807. PubMed ID: 37600967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bayesian estimation of species divergence times under a molecular clock using multiple fossil calibrations with soft bounds.
    Yang Z; Rannala B
    Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Jan; 23(1):212-26. PubMed ID: 16177230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of different strategies for using fossil calibrations to generate the time prior in Bayesian molecular clock dating.
    Barba-Montoya J; Dos Reis M; Yang Z
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2017 Sep; 114():386-400. PubMed ID: 28709986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Insights from Empirical Analyses and Simulations on Using Multiple Fossil Calibrations with Relaxed Clocks to Estimate Divergence Times.
    Carruthers T; Scotland RW
    Mol Biol Evol; 2020 May; 37(5):1508-1529. PubMed ID: 31899514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An Evaluation of Different Partitioning Strategies for Bayesian Estimation of Species Divergence Times.
    Angelis K; Álvarez-Carretero S; Dos Reis M; Yang Z
    Syst Biol; 2018 Jan; 67(1):61-77. PubMed ID: 29029343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Testing the molecular clock using mechanistic models of fossil preservation and molecular evolution.
    Warnock RCM; Yang Z; Donoghue PCJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2017 Jun; 284(1857):. PubMed ID: 28637852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Testing the impact of calibration on molecular divergence times using a fossil-rich group: the case of Nothofagus (Fagales).
    Sauquet H; Ho SY; Gandolfo MA; Jordan GJ; Wilf P; Cantrill DJ; Bayly MJ; Bromham L; Brown GK; Carpenter RJ; Lee DM; Murphy DJ; Sniderman JM; Udovicic F
    Syst Biol; 2012 Mar; 61(2):289-313. PubMed ID: 22201158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of calibration and clock-model choice on molecular estimates of divergence times.
    Duchêne S; Lanfear R; Ho SY
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2014 Sep; 78():277-89. PubMed ID: 24910154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tips and nodes are complementary not competing approaches to the calibration of molecular clocks.
    O'Reilly JE; Donoghue PC
    Biol Lett; 2016 Apr; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 27095263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characterization of the uncertainty of divergence time estimation under relaxed molecular clock models using multiple loci.
    Zhu T; Dos Reis M; Yang Z
    Syst Biol; 2015 Mar; 64(2):267-80. PubMed ID: 25503979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inferring speciation times under an episodic molecular clock.
    Rannala B; Yang Z
    Syst Biol; 2007 Jun; 56(3):453-66. PubMed ID: 17558967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Incompatible Ages for Clearwing Butterflies Based on Alternative Secondary Calibrations.
    Garzón-Orduña IJ; Silva-Brandão KL; Willmott KR; Freitas AV; Brower AV
    Syst Biol; 2015 Sep; 64(5):752-67. PubMed ID: 26012872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating fossil calibrations for dating phylogenies in light of rates of molecular evolution: a comparison of three approaches.
    Lukoschek V; Scott Keogh J; Avise JC
    Syst Biol; 2012 Jan; 61(1):22-43. PubMed ID: 21840843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of the representation of fossil calibrations on Bayesian estimation of species divergence times.
    Inoue J; Donoghue PC; Yang Z
    Syst Biol; 2010 Jan; 59(1):74-89. PubMed ID: 20525621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Integrating fossil preservation biases in the selection of calibrations for molecular divergence time estimation.
    Dornburg A; Beaulieu JM; Oliver JC; Near TJ
    Syst Biol; 2011 Jul; 60(4):519-27. PubMed ID: 21436104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Local molecular clocks in three nuclear genes: divergence times for rodents and other mammals and incompatibility among fossil calibrations.
    Douzery EJ; Delsuc F; Stanhope MJ; Huchon D
    J Mol Evol; 2003; 57 Suppl 1():S201-13. PubMed ID: 15008417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fossil calibrations and molecular divergence time estimates in centrarchid fishes (Teleostei: Centrarchidae).
    Near TJ; Bolnick DI; Wainwright PC
    Evolution; 2005 Aug; 59(8):1768-82. PubMed ID: 16329246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.