These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32266500)
41. The effect of hemodiafiltration vs. high-flux hemodialysis on alpha 1-microglobulin level and dialysate albumin loss using a dialyzer surface area of 2.6 m². ElSayed H; Fathy M; Khedr A; Hussein HS; Elbraky A; ElSharkawy M Egypt J Immunol; 2023 Jul; 30(3):124-133. PubMed ID: 37440533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Therapeutic effect of high-efficiency online hemodiafiltration for recurrent restless legs syndrome in dialysis patients. Sakurai K; Saito T; Hosoya H; Kurihara Y; Yamauchi F J Artif Organs; 2020 Sep; 23(3):296-301. PubMed ID: 32232678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Osteocalcin and myoglobin removal in on-line hemodiafiltration versus low- and high-flux hemodialysis. Maduell F; Navarro V; Cruz MC; Torregrosa E; Garcia D; Simon V; Ferrero JA Am J Kidney Dis; 2002 Sep; 40(3):582-9. PubMed ID: 12200811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Centralized on-line hemodiafiltration system utilizing purified dialysate as substitution fluid. Sato T; Koga N Artif Organs; 1998 Apr; 22(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 9555959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Divert to ULTRA: differences in infused volumes and clearance in two on-line hemodiafiltration treatments. Panichi V; De Ferrari G; Saffioti S; Sidoti A; Biagioli M; Bianchi S; Imperiali P; Gabbrielli C; Conti P; Patrone P; Falqui V; Rombolà G; Mura C; Icardi A; Mulas D; Rosati A; Santori F; Mannarino A; Tomei V; Bertucci A; Steckiph D; Palla R Int J Artif Organs; 2012 Jun; 35(6):435-43. PubMed ID: 22669588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Efficacy and safety of the Clearum dialyzer. Maduell F; Broseta JJ; Rodríguez-Espinosa D; Hermida-Lama E; Cuadrado-Payán E; Rodas LM; Gómez M; Arias-Guillén M; Fontseré N; Vera M; Rico N Artif Organs; 2021 Oct; 45(10):1195-1201. PubMed ID: 33978975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Biomarkers for evaluation of clinical outcomes of hemodiafiltration. Sakurai K Blood Purif; 2013; 35 Suppl 1():64-8. PubMed ID: 23466382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Comparison of toxin removal outcomes in online hemodiafiltration and intra-dialytic exercise in high-flux hemodialysis: a prospective randomized open-label clinical study protocol. Maheshwari V; Samavedham L; Rangaiah GP; Loy Y; Ling LH; Sethi S; Leong TL BMC Nephrol; 2012 Nov; 13():156. PubMed ID: 23176731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. [On-line haemodiafiltration with sorbent-regenerated ultrafiltrate as replacement fluid: Beta2-microglobulin removal versus filtration fraction]. Emiliani G; Briganti M; Montanari A; Isola E; Fusaroli M G Ital Nefrol; 2004; 21 Suppl 30():S80-4. PubMed ID: 15747312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Long term variation of serum levels of uremic toxins in patients treated by post-dilution high volume on-line hemodiafiltration in comparison to standard low-flux bicarbonate dialysis: results from the REDERT study. Panichi V; Rocchetti MT; Scatena A; Rosati A; Migliori M; Pizzarelli F; Gesualdo L; J Nephrol; 2017 Aug; 30(4):583-591. PubMed ID: 28337716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Clinical comparison of super high-flux HD and on-line HDF. Fujimori A Blood Purif; 2013; 35 Suppl 1():81-4. PubMed ID: 23466386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]