These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32266500)

  • 81. Hemofiltration or hemodiafiltration with on-line production of substitution fluid: clinical observation of safety and effectiveness.
    Li X; Li M; Liu T; Li L; Duan L; Li Y; Yang G; Guo L
    Chin Med J (Engl); 1997 Jul; 110(7):520-5. PubMed ID: 9594209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Transmembrane pressure modulation in high-volume mixed hemodiafiltration to optimize efficiency and minimize protein loss.
    Pedrini LA; Cozzi G; Faranna P; Mercieri A; Ruggiero P; Zerbi S; Feliciani A; Riva A
    Kidney Int; 2006 Feb; 69(3):573-9. PubMed ID: 16407883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. Comparison of the pre-dilution and post-dilution methods for online hemodiafiltration.
    Kawai Y; Maeda K; Moriishi M; Kawanishi H; Masaki T
    J Artif Organs; 2024 Mar; 27(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 37010653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. On-line haemodiafiltration versus low-flux haemodialysis. A prospective randomized study.
    Wizemann V; Lotz C; Techert F; Uthoff S
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2000; 15 Suppl 1():43-8. PubMed ID: 10737166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Online-haemodiafiltration vs. conventional haemodialysis: a cross-over study.
    Jean G; Hurot JM; Deleaval P; Mayor B; Lorriaux C
    BMC Nephrol; 2015 May; 16():70. PubMed ID: 25956949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Removal of the protein-bound solute p-cresol by convective transport: a randomized crossover study.
    Bammens B; Evenepoel P; Verbeke K; Vanrenterghem Y
    Am J Kidney Dis; 2004 Aug; 44(2):278-85. PubMed ID: 15264186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. Comparison between on-line high-efficiency hemodiafiltration and conventional high-flux hemodialysis for polyclonal free light chain removal.
    Lamy T; Henri P; Lobbedez T; Comby E; Ryckelynck JP; Ficheux M
    Blood Purif; 2014; 37(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 24603634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Enhancement of solute clearance using pulsatile push-pull dialysate flow for the Quanta SC+: A novel clinic-to-home haemodialysis system.
    Buckberry C; Hoenich N; Krieter D; Lemke HD; Rüth M; Milad JE
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229233. PubMed ID: 32119698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Online hemodiafiltration.
    Van Laecke S; De Wilde K; Vanholder R
    Artif Organs; 2006 Aug; 30(8):579-85. PubMed ID: 16911311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Current Evidence in Haemodiafiltration.
    Locatelli F; Violo L; Longhi S; Del Vecchio L
    Blood Purif; 2015; 40 Suppl 1():24-9. PubMed ID: 26344510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. Optimization of mid-dilution haemodiafiltration: technique and performance.
    Pedrini LA; Feliciani A; Zerbi S; Cozzi G; Ruggiero P
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2009 Sep; 24(9):2816-24. PubMed ID: 19420103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. [On-line sequential hemodiafiltration (HDF-OL-S): a new therapeutic option].
    Kanter J; Puerta MC; García RP; Gómez JM; Jofré R; Rodríguez PB
    Nefrologia; 2008; 28(4):433-8. PubMed ID: 18662152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. High-Flux Dialysis: Clinical, Biochemical, and Proteomic Comparison with Low-Flux Dialysis and On-Line Hemodiafiltration.
    Donadio C; Kanaki A; Sami N; Tognotti D
    Blood Purif; 2017; 44(2):129-139. PubMed ID: 28571019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Online high-efficiency haemodiafiltration achieves higher serum free light chain removal than high-flux haemodialysis in multiple myeloma patients: preliminary quantitative study.
    Granger Vallée A; Chenine L; Leray-Moragues H; Patrier L; Cognot C; Cartron G; Cristol JP; Canaud B
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2011 Nov; 26(11):3627-33. PubMed ID: 21508098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Mechanisms of solute and fluid removal in hemodiafiltration.
    Yamashita AC
    Contrib Nephrol; 2007; 158():50-56. PubMed ID: 17684342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. [Monitoring hemodialysis dose with ionic dialisance in on-line hemodiafiltration].
    Maduell F; Puchades MJ; Navarro V; Torregrosa E; Rius A; Sánchez JJ
    Nefrologia; 2005; 25(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 16392302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. A simple method for the calculation of dialysis Kt factor as a quantitative measure of removal efficiency of uremic retention solutes: Applicability to high-dialysate vs low-dialysate volume technologies.
    Colussi G; Brunati CCM; Gervasi F; Montoli A; Vergani D; Curci F; Minetti E
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0233331. PubMed ID: 32469929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. [Mid-dilution hemodiafiltration].
    Mandolfo S
    G Ital Nefrol; 2012; 29 Suppl 55():S46-9. PubMed ID: 22723143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. [Unconventional hemodiafiltration: double-high-flux and push-pull].
    Lentini P; Pellanda V; Contestabile A; Berlingo G; de Cal M; Ronco C; Dell'Aquila R
    G Ital Nefrol; 2012; 29 Suppl 55():S89-96. PubMed ID: 22723149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. Effect of high fiber density ratio polysulfone dialyzer on protein removal.
    Tomo T; Matsuyama M; Nakata T; Kadota J; Toma S; Koga N; Fukui H; Arizono K; Takamiya T; Matsuyama K; Ueyama S; Shiohira Y; Uezu Y; Higa A
    Blood Purif; 2008; 26(4):347-53. PubMed ID: 18487878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.