These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3226664)

  • 1. Acoustic stimulation testing.
    Kuhlman KA; Depp R
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 1988 Jun; 15(2):303-19. PubMed ID: 3226664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nonstress and contraction stress fetal heart rate monitoring. A randomized trial to determine which is the faster primary test.
    Newnham JP; Burns SE; Szczygielski C; Roberman B
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Apr; 33(4):356-60. PubMed ID: 3367336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fetal acoustic stimulation testing. III. Predictive value of a reactive test.
    Smith CV; Phelan JP; Broussard P; Paul RH
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Feb; 33(2):217-8. PubMed ID: 3351822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Continuing experience with the fetal acoustic stimulation test.
    Smith CV; Phelan JP; Nguyen HN; Jacobs N; Paul RH
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Apr; 33(4):365-8. PubMed ID: 3367338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective evaluation of the contraction stress and nonstress tests in the management of post-term pregnancy.
    Druzin ML; Karver ML; Wagner W; Hutson JM; Waltner A; Kogut E
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1992 Jun; 174(6):507-12. PubMed ID: 1595028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The uses and limitations of the fetal biophysical profile.
    Oyelese Y; Vintzileos AM
    Clin Perinatol; 2011 Mar; 38(1):47-64, v-vi. PubMed ID: 21353089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of maternal perception of sound-provoked fetal movement as a test of antenatal fetal health.
    Arulkumaran S; Anandakumar C; Wong YC; Ratnam SS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Feb; 73(2):182-6. PubMed ID: 2911425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fetal vibroacoustic stimulation.
    Zimmer EZ; Divon MY
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Mar; 81(3):451-7. PubMed ID: 8437804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical study on detecting false non-reactive of non-stress test by improved acoustic stimulation.
    Xi Q; Du J; Liu X; Shao L
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Aug; 284(2):271-4. PubMed ID: 20677022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A review of the nonstress test.
    Knuppel RA; Lake M; Ingram JM
    J Reprod Med; 1982 Mar; 27(3):120-6. PubMed ID: 7086760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fetal biophysical profile score and the nonstress test: a comparative trial.
    Manning FA; Lange IR; Morrison I; Harman CR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Sep; 64(3):326-31. PubMed ID: 6379529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Antenatal fetal assessment: contraction stress test, nonstress test, vibroacoustic stimulation, amniotic fluid volume, biophysical profile, and modified biophysical profile--an overview.
    Devoe LD
    Semin Perinatol; 2008 Aug; 32(4):247-52. PubMed ID: 18652922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maternal perception of sound-provoked fetal movement as a test of antepartum fetal wellbeing.
    Chutiwongse S; Tannirandorn Y; Sukcharoen N; Witoonpanich P; Snidvongs W; Phaosavasdi S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1991 May; 74(5):257-63. PubMed ID: 1783873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Monitoring of high-risk pregnancies. Complementary aspects of the nonstress test, the oxytocin test and the biophysical score].
    Beco J; Lambotte R
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1986; 15(8):997-1008. PubMed ID: 3546475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acoustic stimulation: effect on heart rate and other biophysical variables.
    Gagnon R
    Clin Perinatol; 1989 Sep; 16(3):643-60. PubMed ID: 2673613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the acoustic stimulation test with nonstress test. A randomized, controlled clinical trial.
    Tongsong T; Piyamongkol W
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Jan; 39(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 8169910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of fetal well-being using the nonstress test in the home setting.
    Naef RW; Morrison JC; Washburne JF; McLaughlin BN; Perry KG; Roberts WE
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Sep; 84(3):424-6. PubMed ID: 8058242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The duration of the outpatient nonstress test (NST) and the diagnosis of fetal reactivity with noncomputerized cardiotocography, A critical review of 1160 tracings].
    Cito G
    Minerva Ginecol; 1997; 49(1-2):35-8. PubMed ID: 9162883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. NST vs CST: the nonstress test in high risk pregnancies.
    Cederlind CJ
    J Kans Med Soc; 1980 Feb; 81(2):74-8. PubMed ID: 7351510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using fetal acoustic stimulation to shorten the biophysical profile.
    Pinette MG; Blackstone J; Wax JR; Cartin A
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2005 Jun; 33(5):223-5. PubMed ID: 16047387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.