247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32267787)
1. Evaluation of the Quality of Printed Online Education Materials in Cosmetic Facial Plastic Surgery.
Alwani MM; Campiti VJ; Bandali EH; Nesemeier BR; Ting JY; Shipchandler TZ
Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med; 2020; 22(4):255-261. PubMed ID: 32267787
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Cosmetic facial surgery: are online resources reliable and do patients understand them?
Awal DH; Mills C
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Feb; 56(2):124-128. PubMed ID: 29307586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An Appraisal of Printed Online Education Materials on Spasmodic Dysphonia.
Alwani MM; Campa KA; Svenstrup TJ; Bandali EH; Anthony BP
J Voice; 2021 Jul; 35(4):659.e1-659.e9. PubMed ID: 31883851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.
Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Online information for incisional hernia repair: What are patients reading?
Rouhi AD; Ghanem YK; Bader E; Hoeltzel GD; Joshi ART; Williams NN; Dumon KR
Surgeon; 2023 Aug; 21(4):e195-e200. PubMed ID: 36588086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality of Web-Based Sickle Cell Disease Resources for Health Care Transition: Website Content Analysis.
Annesi T; Steinway C; Oluwole T; Shilly S; Szalda D; Myers R; Chen J; Jan S
JMIR Pediatr Parent; 2023 Dec; 6():e48924. PubMed ID: 38100579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating the Quality and Readability of Internet Information on Meningiomas.
Saeed F; Anderson I
World Neurosurg; 2017 Jan; 97():312-316. PubMed ID: 27742505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality of Web-based Information for the 10 Most Common Fractures.
Memon M; Ginsberg L; Simunovic N; Ristevski B; Bhandari M; Kleinlugtenbelt YV
Interact J Med Res; 2016 Jun; 5(2):e19. PubMed ID: 27317159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating the quality and readability of Internet information sources regarding the treatment of swallowing disorders.
O'Connell Ferster AP; Hu A
Ear Nose Throat J; 2017 Mar; 96(3):128-138. PubMed ID: 28346643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Online resources for information on shoulder arthroplasty: an assessment of quality and readability.
Fares MY; Singh J; Vadhera AS; Koa J; Boufadel P; Abboud JA
Clin Shoulder Elb; 2023 Sep; 26(3):238-244. PubMed ID: 37607858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality and readability of web-based information on dental caries in Arabic: an infodemiological study.
Aboalshamat K
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Oct; 23(1):797. PubMed ID: 37880640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality and Readability of Online Information on In-Office Vocal Fold Injections.
Yi GS; Hu A
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2020 Mar; 129(3):294-300. PubMed ID: 31701778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prostate Cancer on the Web-Expedient Tool for Patients' Decision-Making?
Borgmann H; Wölm JH; Vallo S; Mager R; Huber J; Breyer J; Salem J; Loeb S; Haferkamp A; Tsaur I
J Cancer Educ; 2017 Mar; 32(1):135-140. PubMed ID: 26234650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A critical appraisal of web-based information on shoulder pain comparing biomedical vs. psychosocial information.
Barrett DR; Boone JD; Butch JO; Cavender JA; Sole G; Wassinger CA
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Jan; 32(1):e23-e32. PubMed ID: 36108880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Critical Analysis of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Aspects of Online Information Provided for Neck-Lifts.
Rayess H; Zuliani GF; Gupta A; Svider PF; Folbe AJ; Eloy JA; Carron MA
JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2017 Mar; 19(2):115-120. PubMed ID: 27812680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Internet-Based Resources Frequently Provide Inaccurate and Out-of-Date Recommendations on Preoperative Fasting: A Systematic Review.
Roughead T; Sewell D; Ryerson CJ; Fisher JH; Flexman AM
Anesth Analg; 2016 Dec; 123(6):1463-1468. PubMed ID: 27644057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What parents are reading about laryngomalacia: Quality and readability of internet resources on laryngomalacia.
Corredera E; Davis KS; Simons JP; Jabbour N
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 May; 108():175-179. PubMed ID: 29605350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Your patient information website: how good is it?
Soobrah R; Clark SK
Colorectal Dis; 2012 Mar; 14(3):e90-4. PubMed ID: 21883807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Uterine Artery Embolization: An Analysis of Online Patient Information Quality and Readability with Historical Comparison.
Murray TE; Mansoor T; Bowden DJ; O'Neill DC; Lee MJ
Acad Radiol; 2018 May; 25(5):619-625. PubMed ID: 29331361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Consulting Dr. Google: Quality of Online Resources About Tympanostomy Tube Placement.
Harris VC; Links AR; Hong P; Walsh J; Schoo DP; Tunkel DE; Stewart CM; Boss EF
Laryngoscope; 2018 Feb; 128(2):496-501. PubMed ID: 28842989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
