342 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32267923)
1. Current status of genomic evaluation.
Misztal I; Lourenco D; Legarra A
J Anim Sci; 2020 Apr; 98(4):. PubMed ID: 32267923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development of genomic predictions for Angus cattle in Brazil incorporating genotypes from related American sires.
Campos GS; Cardoso FF; Gomes CCG; Domingues R; de Almeida Regitano LC; de Sena Oliveira MC; de Oliveira HN; Carvalheiro R; Albuquerque LG; Miller S; Misztal I; Lourenco D
J Anim Sci; 2022 Feb; 100(2):. PubMed ID: 35031806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detecting effective starting point of genomic selection by divergent trends from best linear unbiased prediction and single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction in pigs, beef cattle, and broilers.
Abdollahi-Arpanahi R; Lourenco D; Misztal I
J Anim Sci; 2021 Sep; 99(9):. PubMed ID: 34390341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Empirical comparison between different methods for genomic prediction of number of piglets born alive in moderate sized breeding populations.
Fangmann A; Sharifi RA; Heinkel J; Danowski K; Schrade H; Erbe M; Simianer H
J Anim Sci; 2017 Apr; 95(4):1434-1443. PubMed ID: 28464085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Invited review: Unknown-parent groups and metafounders in single-step genomic BLUP.
Masuda Y; VanRaden PM; Tsuruta S; Lourenco DAL; Misztal I
J Dairy Sci; 2022 Feb; 105(2):923-939. PubMed ID: 34799109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genetic evaluation using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in American Angus.
Lourenco DA; Tsuruta S; Fragomeni BO; Masuda Y; Aguilar I; Legarra A; Bertrand JK; Amen TS; Wang L; Moser DW; Misztal I
J Anim Sci; 2015 Jun; 93(6):2653-62. PubMed ID: 26115253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Indirect predictions with a large number of genotyped animals using the algorithm for proven and young.
Garcia ALS; Masuda Y; Tsuruta S; Miller S; Misztal I; Lourenco D
J Anim Sci; 2020 Jun; 98(6):. PubMed ID: 32374831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficient approximation of reliabilities for single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor models with the Algorithm for Proven and Young.
Bermann M; Lourenco D; Misztal I
J Anim Sci; 2022 Jan; 100(1):. PubMed ID: 34877603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genomic predictions for yield traits in US Holsteins with unknown parent groups.
Cesarani A; Masuda Y; Tsuruta S; Nicolazzi EL; VanRaden PM; Lourenco D; Misztal I
J Dairy Sci; 2021 May; 104(5):5843-5853. PubMed ID: 33663836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficient large-scale single-step evaluations and indirect genomic prediction of genotyped selection candidates.
Vandenplas J; Ten Napel J; Darbaghshahi SN; Evans R; Calus MPL; Veerkamp R; Cromie A; Mäntysaari EA; Strandén I
Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Jun; 55(1):37. PubMed ID: 37291510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genomic prediction ability for beef fatty acid profile in Nelore cattle using different pseudo-phenotypes.
Chiaia HLJ; Peripolli E; de Oliveira Silva RM; Feitosa FLB; de Lemos MVA; Berton MP; Olivieri BF; Espigolan R; Tonussi RL; Gordo DGM; de Albuquerque LG; de Oliveira HN; Ferrinho AM; Mueller LF; Kluska S; Tonhati H; Pereira ASC; Aguilar I; Baldi F
J Appl Genet; 2018 Nov; 59(4):493-501. PubMed ID: 30251238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Implications of SNP weighting on single-step genomic predictions for different reference population sizes.
Lourenco DAL; Fragomeni BO; Bradford HL; Menezes IR; Ferraz JBS; Aguilar I; Tsuruta S; Misztal I
J Anim Breed Genet; 2017 Dec; 134(6):463-471. PubMed ID: 28833593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Alternative SNP weighting for single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor evaluation of stature in US Holsteins in the presence of selected sequence variants.
Fragomeni BO; Lourenco DAL; Legarra A; VanRaden PM; Misztal I
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Nov; 102(11):10012-10019. PubMed ID: 31495612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Methods for genomic evaluation of a relatively small genotyped dairy population and effect of genotyped cow information in multiparity analyses.
Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Aguilar I; Ezra E; Ron M; Shirak A; Weller JI
J Dairy Sci; 2014 Mar; 97(3):1742-52. PubMed ID: 24472123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Theoretical accuracy for indirect predictions based on SNP effects from single-step GBLUP.
Garcia A; Aguilar I; Legarra A; Tsuruta S; Misztal I; Lourenco D
Genet Sel Evol; 2022 Sep; 54(1):66. PubMed ID: 36162979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differing genetic trend estimates from traditional and genomic evaluations of genotyped animals as evidence of preselection bias in US Holsteins.
Masuda Y; VanRaden PM; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jun; 101(6):5194-5206. PubMed ID: 29573806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of genomic predictions using genomic relationship matrices built with different weighting factors to account for locus-specific variances.
Su G; Christensen OF; Janss L; Lund MS
J Dairy Sci; 2014 Oct; 97(10):6547-59. PubMed ID: 25129495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of genomic predictions for lowly heritable traits using multi-step and single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in Holstein cattle.
Guarini AR; Lourenco DAL; Brito LF; Sargolzaei M; Baes CF; Miglior F; Misztal I; Schenkel FS
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Sep; 101(9):8076-8086. PubMed ID: 29935829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prediction accuracy for a simulated maternally affected trait of beef cattle using different genomic evaluation models.
Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Wang H; Aguilar I; Tsuruta S; Bertrand JK
J Anim Sci; 2013 Sep; 91(9):4090-8. PubMed ID: 23893997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving the accuracy of genomic evaluation for linear body measurement traits using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction in Hanwoo beef cattle.
Naserkheil M; Lee DH; Mehrban H
BMC Genet; 2020 Dec; 21(1):144. PubMed ID: 33267771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
