These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32267959)
1. A Systematic Review of Subclinical Keratoconus and Forme Fruste Keratoconus. Henriquez MA; Hadid M; Izquierdo L J Refract Surg; 2020 Apr; 36(4):270-279. PubMed ID: 32267959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Objective and subjective diagnostic parameters in the fellow eye of unilateral keratoconus. Awad EA; Abou Samra WA; Torky MA; El-Kannishy AM BMC Ophthalmol; 2017 Oct; 17(1):186. PubMed ID: 28985735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Corneal Dynamic and Tomographic Analysis in Normal, Forme Fruste Keratoconic, and Keratoconic Eyes. Wang YM; Chan TCY; Yu M; Jhanji V J Refract Surg; 2017 Sep; 33(9):632-638. PubMed ID: 28880339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Posterior corneal elevation and back difference corneal elevation in diagnosing forme fruste keratoconus in the fellow eyes of unilateral keratoconus patients. Muftuoglu O; Ayar O; Ozulken K; Ozyol E; Akıncı A J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Sep; 39(9):1348-57. PubMed ID: 23820305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of three-dimensional optical coherence tomography and combining a rotating Scheimpflug camera with a Placido topography system for forme fruste keratoconus diagnosis. Fukuda S; Beheregaray S; Hoshi S; Yamanari M; Lim Y; Hiraoka T; Yasuno Y; Oshika T Br J Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 97(12):1554-9. PubMed ID: 24081501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of the reference surface shape for discriminating between normal corneas, subclinical keratoconus, and keratoconus. Smadja D; Santhiago MR; Mello GR; Krueger RR; Colin J; Touboul D J Refract Surg; 2013 Apr; 29(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 23557226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combining Placido and Corneal Wavefront Data for the Detection of Forme Fruste Keratoconus. Saad A; Gatinel D J Refract Surg; 2016 Aug; 32(8):510-6. PubMed ID: 27505311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Second-generation corneal deformation signal waveform analysis in normal, forme fruste keratoconic, and manifest keratoconic corneas after statistical correction for potentially confounding factors. Zhang L; Danesh J; Tannan A; Phan V; Yu F; Hamilton DR J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2196-204. PubMed ID: 26703296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical properties analysis of forme fruste keratoconus and subclinical keratoconus. Huo Y; Chen X; Cao H; Li J; Hou J; Wang Y Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2023 May; 261(5):1311-1320. PubMed ID: 36441226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Yield of Display Modules of Corneal Tomography for Early Diagnosis of Corneal Ectasia. Vlasák O; Škorpíková J; Hlinomazová Z; Kalandrová V Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2019; 74(5):175-183. PubMed ID: 31234630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Role of Ocular Response Analyzer in Differentiation of Forme Fruste Keratoconus From Corneal Astigmatism. Kirgiz A; Karaman Erdur S; Atalay K; Gurez C Eye Contact Lens; 2019 Mar; 45(2):83-87. PubMed ID: 30265255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of Corneal Ectasia Using OCT Maps of Pachymetry and Posterior Surface Mean Curvature. Pavlatos E; Chen S; Chamberlain W; Huang D; Li Y J Refract Surg; 2022 Aug; 38(8):502-510. PubMed ID: 35946999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In-vivo corneal biomechanical analysis of unilateral keratoconus. Ayar O; Ozmen MC; Muftuoglu O; Akdemir MO; Koc M; Ozulken K Int J Ophthalmol; 2015; 8(6):1141-5. PubMed ID: 26682162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnosis of forme fruste keratoconus with scheimpflug photography in Ghanaian patients. Lartey S; Appiagyei E BMC Ophthalmol; 2024 Jul; 24(1):285. PubMed ID: 39009964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy of axial and tangential corneal topography maps in detecting subclinical keratoconus. Tummanapalli SS; Potluri H; Vaddavalli PK; Sangwan VS J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2205-14. PubMed ID: 26703297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Topographic typology in a consecutive series of refractive surgery candidates. Mohammadi SF; Mohammadzadeh V; Kadivar S; Beheshtnejad AH; Norooznezhad AH; Hashemi SH Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 38(4):1611-1619. PubMed ID: 28676992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of multimetric D index with keratometric, pachymetric, and posterior elevation parameters in diagnosing subclinical keratoconus in fellow eyes of asymmetric keratoconus patients. Muftuoglu O; Ayar O; Hurmeric V; Orucoglu F; Kılıc I J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Mar; 41(3):557-65. PubMed ID: 25708211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Iatrogenic keratectasia after LASIK in a case of forme fruste keratoconus. Seiler T; Quurke AW J Cataract Refract Surg; 1998 Jul; 24(7):1007-9. PubMed ID: 9682124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differentiating Between Contact Lens Warpage and Keratoconus Using OCT Maps of Corneal Mean Curvature and Epithelial Thickness. Pavlatos E; Harkness B; Louie D; Chamberlain W; Huang D; Li Y J Refract Surg; 2022 Feb; 38(2):112-119. PubMed ID: 35156455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of Biomechanically Corrected Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Keratoconus and Forme Fruste Keratoconus. Nishida T; Kojima T; Kataoka T; Isogai N; Yoshida Y; Nakamura T Ophthalmic Res; 2020; 63(6):541-549. PubMed ID: 32106114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]