166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32268333)
21. The Bonebridge in Adults with Mixed and Conductive Hearing Loss: Audiological and Quality of Life Outcomes.
Skarżyński PH; Ratuszniak A; Król B; Kozieł M; Osińska K; Cywka KB; Sztabnicka A; Skarżyński H
Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(2):90-99. PubMed ID: 31141814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Clinical performance of the Osia™ system, a new active osseointegrated implant system. Results from a prospective clinical investigation.
Goycoolea M; Ribalta G; Tocornal F; Levy R; Alarcón P; Bryman M; Cagnacci B; Catenacci C; Oyanguren V; Vilches I; Briones V; García R
Acta Otolaryngol; 2020 Mar; 140(3):212-219. PubMed ID: 32068449
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Preliminary functional results and quality of life after implantation of a new bone conduction hearing device in patients with conductive and mixed hearing loss.
Ihler F; Volbers L; Blum J; Matthias C; Canis M
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Feb; 35(2):211-5. PubMed ID: 24448279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of a new powerful bone-anchored hearing system: a comparison study.
Bosman AJ; Snik AF; Hol MK; Mylanus EA
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):505-13. PubMed ID: 23886427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A comparative study of hearing aids and round window application of the vibrant sound bridge (VSB) for patients with mixed or conductive hearing loss.
Marino R; Linton N; Eikelboom RH; Statham E; Rajan GP
Int J Audiol; 2013 Apr; 52(4):209-18. PubMed ID: 23527900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Benefit of Higher Maximum Force Output on Listening Effort in Bone-Anchored Hearing System Users: A Pupillometry Study.
Bianchi F; Wendt D; Wassard C; Maas P; Lunner T; Rosenbom T; Holmberg M
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(5):1220-1232. PubMed ID: 30807542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Hearing performance with 2 different high-power sound processors for osseointegrated auditory implants.
Kurz A; Caversaccio M; Kompis M
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Jun; 34(4):604-10. PubMed ID: 23652327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A Comparative Study of a Novel Adhesive Bone Conduction Device and Conventional Treatment Options for Conductive Hearing Loss.
Skarzynski PH; Ratuszniak A; Osinska K; Koziel M; Krol B; Cywka KB; Skarzynski H
Otol Neurotol; 2019 Aug; 40(7):858-864. PubMed ID: 31295197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Transcutaneous bone-conduction hearing device: audiological and surgical aspects in a first series of patients with mixed hearing loss.
Barbara M; Perotti M; Gioia B; Volpini L; Monini S
Acta Otolaryngol; 2013 Oct; 133(10):1058-64. PubMed ID: 23768011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparisons of sound processors based on osseointegrated implants in patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss.
Pfiffner F; Caversaccio MD; Kompis M
Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jul; 32(5):728-35. PubMed ID: 21646934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Long-Term Outcomes of Vibroplasty Coupler Implantations to Treat Mixed/Conductive Hearing Loss.
Zahnert T; Mlynski R; Löwenheim H; Beutner D; Hagen R; Ernst A; Zehlicke T; Kühne H; Friese N; Tropitzsch A; Luers JC; Todt I; Hüttenbrink KB
Audiol Neurootol; 2018; 23(6):316-325. PubMed ID: 30650421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Outcome prediction for Bonebridge candidates based on audiological indication criteria.
Wimmer W; von Werdt M; Mantokoudis G; Anschuetz L; Kompis M; Caversaccio M
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2019 Oct; 46(5):681-686. PubMed ID: 30635142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The Oticon Ponto System in Adults With Severe-to-Profound and Mixed Hearing Loss: Audiologic Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction.
Skarzynski PH; Dziendziel B; Wlodarczyk E; Skarzynski H
Otol Neurotol; 2022 Oct; 43(9):987-994. PubMed ID: 36040042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Long-term data of the new transcutaneous partially implantable bone conduction hearing system Osia®.
Rauch AK; Wesarg T; Aschendorff A; Speck I; Arndt S
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Sep; 279(9):4279-4288. PubMed ID: 34792628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Unilateral and Bilateral Audiological Benefit With an Adhesively Attached, Noninvasive Bone Conduction Hearing System.
Gawliczek T; Munzinger F; Anschuetz L; Caversaccio M; Kompis M; Wimmer W
Otol Neurotol; 2018 Sep; 39(8):1025-1030. PubMed ID: 30015748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Individualised headband simulation test for predicting outcome after percutaneous bone conductive implantation.
Monini S; Filippi C; Atturo F; Biagini M; Lazzarino AI; Barbara M
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2015 Oct; 35(4):258-64. PubMed ID: 26824212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Audiological benefit and subjective satisfaction of children with the ADHEAR audio processor and adhesive adapter.
Favoreel A; Heuninck E; Mansbach AL
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Feb; 129():109729. PubMed ID: 31689608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A Comparative Study of Audiologic Outcomes for Two Transcutaneous Bone-Anchored Hearing Devices.
Powell HR; Rolfe AM; Birman CS
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Sep; 36(9):1525-31. PubMed ID: 26375976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Auditory Performance and Subjective Satisfaction with the ADHEAR System.
Almuhawas F; Alzhrani F; Saleh S; Alsanosi A; Yousef M
Audiol Neurootol; 2021; 26(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 32544908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Improvement of speech perception in quiet and in noise without decreasing localization abilities with the bone conduction device Bonebridge.
Weiss R; Leinung M; Baumann U; Weißgerber T; Rader T; Stöver T
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 May; 274(5):2107-2115. PubMed ID: 28032241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
