These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3226880)
1. Are letter codes always activated? Greenberg SN Percept Psychophys; 1988 Oct; 44(4):331-8. PubMed ID: 3226880 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Reading versus naming: the effect of target set size on contextual interference and facilitation. La Heij W; Vermeij M Percept Psychophys; 1987 Apr; 41(4):355-66. PubMed ID: 3588233 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Context-dependent migrations in visual word perception. van der Velde F; van der Heijden AH; Schreuder R J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Feb; 15(1):133-41. PubMed ID: 2522523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Orthographic and lexical processing of visual letter strings. Marmurek HH; Briscoe G Can J Psychol; 1982 Sep; 36(3):368-87. PubMed ID: 7172127 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing the importance of letter pairs in initial, exterior, and interior positions in reading. Jordan TR; Thomas SM; Patching GR; Scott-Brown KC J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):883-93. PubMed ID: 14516221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. More about the letter-frequency effect. Mason M Percept Psychophys; 1982 Jun; 31(6):589-90. PubMed ID: 7122197 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. On visual access to letter case and lexical/semantic information. Avant LL; Thieman AA Mem Cognit; 1985 Sep; 13(5):392-404. PubMed ID: 4088049 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Visual letter-matching and the time course of visual and acoustic codes. Carrasco M; Kinchla RA; Figueroa JG Acta Psychol (Amst); 1988 Oct; 69(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 3245474 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. On the role of word frequency in the detection of component letters. Johnson NF; Allen PA; Strand TL Mem Cognit; 1989 Jul; 17(4):474-82. PubMed ID: 2761405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Proofreading familiar text: allocating resources to perceptual and conceptual processes. Levy BA; Begin J Mem Cognit; 1984 Nov; 12(6):621-32. PubMed ID: 6533431 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. On priming by a sentence context. Stanovich KE; West RF J Exp Psychol Gen; 1983 Mar; 112(1):1-36. PubMed ID: 6221061 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Graded effects of number of inserted letters in superset priming. Welvaert M; Farioli F; Grainger J Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 18271354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The dependence of semantic relatedness effects upon prime processing. Henik A; Friedrich FJ; Kellogg WA Mem Cognit; 1983 Jul; 11(4):366-73. PubMed ID: 6633255 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Lexical ambiguity and its role in models of word recognition. Simpson GB Psychol Bull; 1984 Sep; 96(2):316-40. PubMed ID: 6385046 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Processing times for English and Chinese words. Hoosain R; Osgood CE Percept Psychophys; 1983 Dec; 34(6):573-7. PubMed ID: 6664815 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The interfering effect of word perception on letter identification. Lawry JA Percept Psychophys; 1980 Dec; 28(6):577-88. PubMed ID: 7208274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The facilitation of lexical decisions by a prime occurring after the target. Kiger JI; Glass AL Mem Cognit; 1983 Jul; 11(4):356-65. PubMed ID: 6633254 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Pre- and postlexical loci of contextual effects on word recognition. Seidenberg MS; Waters GS; Sanders M; Langer P Mem Cognit; 1984 Jul; 12(4):315-28. PubMed ID: 6503694 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A word superiority effect with nonorthographic acronyms: testing for unitized visual codes. Noice H; Hock HS Percept Psychophys; 1987 Nov; 42(5):485-90. PubMed ID: 3696943 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]