These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

464 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3226885)

  • 1. Familiarity and visual change detection.
    Pashler H
    Percept Psychophys; 1988 Oct; 44(4):369-78. PubMed ID: 3226885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Selective search in short-term memory under ideal conditions of test stimulus categorization.
    Muthig KP; Ulrich R
    Mem Cognit; 1985 Jan; 13(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 4010511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hemispheric differences in memory search.
    Madden DJ; Nebes RD
    Neuropsychologia; 1980; 18(6):665-73. PubMed ID: 7465026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Familiarity, redundancy, and the spatial control of visual attention.
    Flowers JH; Polansky ML; Kerl S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1981 Feb; 7(1):157-66. PubMed ID: 6452493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High familiarity enhances visual change detection for face stimuli.
    Buttle H; Raymond JE
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Nov; 65(8):1296-306. PubMed ID: 14710963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preference, familiarity, and recognition after repeated brief exposures to random geometric shapes.
    Bonanno GA; Stillings NA
    Am J Psychol; 1986; 99(3):403-15. PubMed ID: 3799851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Some observations upon perceptual organization and the mere exposure effect.
    Todman M
    Percept Mot Skills; 1989 Aug; 69(1):147-60. PubMed ID: 2780175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Change blindness and visual memory: visual representations get rich and act poor.
    Varakin DA; Levin DT
    Br J Psychol; 2006 Feb; 97(Pt 1):51-77. PubMed ID: 16464287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differential acquisition rates for different types of information from pictures.
    Loftus GR; Nelson WW; Kallman HJ
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1983 Feb; 35(Pt 1):187-98. PubMed ID: 6681183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Age, response complexity, and target consistency in visual search.
    Plude DJ; Hoyer WJ; Lazar J
    Exp Aging Res; 1982; 8(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 7128660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Expectancy and visual-spatial attention: effects on perceptual quality.
    Downing CJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1988 May; 14(2):188-202. PubMed ID: 2967876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence for early extraction of emergent properties in visual perception: a replication.
    Kolinsky R; Morais J
    Percept Mot Skills; 1986 Aug; 63(1):171-4. PubMed ID: 3748727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Basics of the figure recognition experiment].
    Drösler J
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1980; 27(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 7385922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative and structural factors in the judgment of pattern complexity.
    Ichikawa S
    Percept Psychophys; 1985 Aug; 38(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 4088801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two techniques for investigating perception without awareness.
    Duncan J
    Percept Psychophys; 1985 Sep; 38(3):296-8. PubMed ID: 4088823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reassessing the automaticity-control distinction: item recognition as a paradigm case.
    Ryan C
    Psychol Rev; 1983 Apr; 90(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 6867218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Iconic memory for elementary visual characteristics: on a poorly accessible visual store and the long-lasting icon].
    Schulz T
    Arch Psychol (Frankf); 1981-1982; 134(1):1-31. PubMed ID: 7347590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term memory for pictures under conditions of thematically related foils.
    Homa D; Viera C
    Mem Cognit; 1988 Sep; 16(5):411-21. PubMed ID: 3173089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recognition deficits resulting from focussed attention in aphasia.
    Cohen R; Woll G; Ehrenstein WH
    Psychol Res; 1981; 43(4):391-405. PubMed ID: 7342159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of familiarity of Multielement matching.
    Regan JE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1981 Dec; 7(6):1273-82. PubMed ID: 6458651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.