179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32268942)
1. Comparison of the Ultrathin Strut, Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-eluting Stent With a Durable Polymer Everolimus-eluting Stent in a Chinese Population: The Randomized BIOFLOW VI Trial.
Li C; Yang Y; Han Y; Song D; Xu J; Guan C; Gao R; Garcia-Garcia HM; Waksman R; Xu B;
Clin Ther; 2020 Apr; 42(4):649-660.e9. PubMed ID: 32268942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ultrathin Bioresorbable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents for Coronary Revascularization: 3-Year Outcomes From the Randomized BIOFLOW V Trial.
Kandzari DE; Koolen JJ; Doros G; Garcia-Garcia HM; Bennett J; Roguin A; Gharib EG; Cutlip DE; Waksman R;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jun; 13(11):1343-1353. PubMed ID: 32499026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Subgroup Analysis Comparing Ultrathin, Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin, Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients.
Roguin A; Kandzari DE; Marcusohn E; Koolen JJ; Doros G; Massaro JM; Garcia-Garcia HM; Bennett J; Gharib EG; Cutlip DE; Waksman R
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Oct; 11(10):e007331. PubMed ID: 30354631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization: 2-Year Results of the BIOSCIENCE Trial.
Zbinden R; Piccolo R; Heg D; Roffi M; Kurz DJ; Muller O; Vuilliomenet A; Cook S; Weilenmann D; Kaiser C; Jamshidi P; Franzone A; Eberli F; Jüni P; Windecker S; Pilgrim T
J Am Heart Assoc; 2016 Mar; 5(3):e003255. PubMed ID: 26979080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ultrathin Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents.
Kandzari DE; Koolen JJ; Doros G; Massaro JJ; Garcia-Garcia HM; Bennett J; Roguin A; Gharib EG; Cutlip DE; Waksman R;
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2018 Dec; 72(25):3287-3297. PubMed ID: 30257191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Ultrathin, Bioresorbable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents and Thin, Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Calcified or Small Vessel Lesions.
Dan K; Garcia-Garcia HM; Kolm P; Windecker S; Saito S; Kandzari DE; Waksman R
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Sep; 13(9):e009189. PubMed ID: 32895004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Unselected Use of Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Coronary Revascularization.
Yamaji K; Zanchin T; Zanchin C; Stortecky S; Koskinas KC; Hunziker L; Praz F; Blöchlinger S; Moro C; Moschovitis A; Seiler C; Valgimigli M; Billinger M; Pilgrim T; Heg D; Windecker S; Räber L
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Sep; 11(9):e006741. PubMed ID: 30354590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ultrathin Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents: BIOFLOW V Final 5-Year Outcomes.
Kandzari DE; Koolen JJ; Doros G; Garcia-Garcia HM; Bennett J; Roguin A; Gharib EG; Cutlip DE; Waksman R;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Sep; 15(18):1852-1860. PubMed ID: 36137689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-Term Effect of Ultrathin-Strut Versus Thin-Strut Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients With Small Vessel Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Subgroup Analysis of the BIOSCIENCE Randomized Trial.
Iglesias JF; Heg D; Roffi M; Tüller D; Noble S; Muller O; Moarof I; Cook S; Weilenmann D; Kaiser C; Cuculi F; Häner J; Jüni P; Windecker S; Pilgrim T
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Aug; 12(8):e008024. PubMed ID: 31525083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Five-Year Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Treated With Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents.
Iglesias JF; Heg D; Roffi M; Tüller D; Lanz J; Rigamonti F; Muller O; Moarof I; Cook S; Weilenmann D; Kaiser C; Cuculi F; Valgimigli M; Jüni P; Windecker S; Pilgrim T
J Am Heart Assoc; 2019 Nov; 8(22):e013607. PubMed ID: 31696762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Randomized Multicenter Trial Investigating Angiographic Outcomes of Hybrid Sirolimus-Eluting Stents With Biodegradable Polymer Compared With Everolimus-Eluting Stents With Durable Polymer in Chronic Total Occlusions: The PRISON IV Trial.
Teeuwen K; van der Schaaf RJ; Adriaenssens T; Koolen JJ; Smits PC; Henriques JP; Vermeersch PH; Tjon Joe Gin RM; Schölzel BE; Kelder JC; Tijssen JG; Agostoni P; Suttorp MJ
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jan; 10(2):133-143. PubMed ID: 28104206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of a novel biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent with a durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent: results of the randomized BIOFLOW-II trial.
Windecker S; Haude M; Neumann FJ; Stangl K; Witzenbichler B; Slagboom T; Sabaté M; Goicolea J; Barragan P; Cook S; Piot C; Richardt G; Merkely B; Schneider H; Bilger J; Erne P; Waksman R; Zaugg S; Jüni P; Lefèvre T
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Feb; 8(2):e001441. PubMed ID: 25634905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: Final 5-Year Report From the COMPARE II Trial (Abluminal Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent).
Vlachojannis GJ; Smits PC; Hofma SH; Togni M; Vázquez N; Valdés M; Voudris V; Slagboom T; Goy JJ; den Heijer P; van der Ent M
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jun; 10(12):1215-1221. PubMed ID: 28579236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy and Safety of Ultrathin, Bioresorbable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin, Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents for Coronary Revascularization of Patients With Diabetes Mellitus.
Waksman R; Shlofmitz E; Windecker S; Koolen JJ; Saito S; Kandzari D; Kolm P; Lipinski MJ; Torguson R
Am J Cardiol; 2019 Oct; 124(7):1020-1026. PubMed ID: 31353004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A randomised comparison of a novel abluminal groove-filled biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent with a durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent: clinical and angiographic follow-up of the TARGET I trial.
Gao RL; Xu B; Lansky AJ; Yang YJ; Ma CS; Han YL; Chen SL; Li H; Zhang RY; Fu GS; Yuan ZY; Jiang H; Huo Y; Li W; Zhang YJ; Leon MB;
EuroIntervention; 2013 May; 9(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 23685298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical outcomes according to diabetic status in patients treated with biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents: prespecified subgroup analysis of the BIOSCIENCE trial.
Franzone A; Pilgrim T; Heg D; Roffi M; Tüller D; Vuilliomenet A; Muller O; Cook S; Weilenmann D; Kaiser C; Jamshidi P; Räber L; Stortecky S; Wenaweser P; Jüni P; Windecker S
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jun; 8(6):. PubMed ID: 26043895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bioresorbable polymer-coated thin strut sirolimus-eluting stent vs durable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stent in daily clinical practice: Propensity matched one-year results from interventional cardiology network registry.
Gasior P; Gierlotka M; Szczurek-Katanski K; Osuch M; Gnot R; Hawranek M; Gasior M; Polonski L
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Jun; 93(7):E362-E368. PubMed ID: 30298545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ten-Year Clinical Outcomes From a Trial of Three Limus-Eluting Stents With Different Polymer Coatings in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease.
Kufner S; Joner M; Thannheimer A; Hoppmann P; Ibrahim T; Mayer K; Cassese S; Laugwitz KL; Schunkert H; Kastrati A; Byrne RA;
Circulation; 2019 Jan; 139(3):325-333. PubMed ID: 30586724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of a Novel Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent With a Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent: 5-Year Outcomes of the Randomized BIOFLOW-II Trial.
Lefèvre T; Haude M; Neumann FJ; Stangl K; Skurk C; Slagboom T; Sabaté M; Goicolea J; Barragan P; Cook S; Macia JC; Windecker S
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 May; 11(10):995-1002. PubMed ID: 29798778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A randomized multicenter trial comparing the XIENCE everolimus eluting stent with the CYPHER sirolimus eluting stent in the treatment of female patients with de novo coronary artery lesions: The SPIRIT WOMEN study.
Franzone A; Zaugg S; Piccolo R; Modena MG; Mikhail GW; Ferré JM; Strasser R; Grinfeld L; Heg D; Jüni P; Windecker S; Morice MC
PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182632. PubMed ID: 28796809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
