270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32270566)
1. Comparison of touch-up ablation rate and pulmonary vein isolation durability between hot balloon and cryoballoon.
Hojo R; Fukamizu S; Tokioka S; Inagaki D; Miyazawa S; Kawamura I; Kitamura T; Sakurada H; Hiraoka M
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2020 Jun; 31(6):1298-1306. PubMed ID: 32270566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hot Balloon Versus Cryoballoon Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Lesion Characteristics and Middle-Term Outcomes.
Nagashima K; Okumura Y; Watanabe I; Nakahara S; Hori Y; Iso K; Watanabe R; Arai M; Wakamatsu Y; Kurokawa S; Mano H; Nakai T; Ohkubo K; Hirayama A
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2018 May; 11(5):e005861. PubMed ID: 29700055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Electrophysiologic and anatomic factors predictive of a need for touch-up radiofrequency application for complete pulmonary vein isolation: Comparison between hot balloon- and cryoballoon-based ablation.
Wakamatsu Y; Nagashima K; Nakahara S; Iso K; Watanabe R; Arai M; Otsuka N; Yagyu S; Kurokawa S; Ohkubo K; Nakai T; Okumura Y
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Aug; 30(8):1261-1269. PubMed ID: 31111558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The fourth cryoballoon generation with a shorter tip to facilitate real-time pulmonary vein potential recording: Feasibility and safety results.
Straube F; Dorwarth U; Pongratz J; Brück B; Wankerl M; Hartl S; Hoffmann E
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Jun; 30(6):918-925. PubMed ID: 30907462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictors of durable pulmonary vein isolation after second-generation cryoballoon ablation with a single short freeze strategy - Different criteria for the best freeze of the 4 individual PVs.
Miyazaki S; Kajiyama T; Watanabe T; Nakamura H; Hachiya H; Tada H; Iesaka Y
Int J Cardiol; 2020 Feb; 301():96-102. PubMed ID: 31759685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison between cryoballoon and hot balloon ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Suruga K; Suenari K; Nakano T; Takemoto H; Hashimoto Y; Tomomoi S; Higaki T; Dai K; Oi K; Kawase T; Nakama Y; Nishioka K; Otsuka M; Masaoka Y; Shiode N; Ito H
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2022 Aug; 64(2):281-290. PubMed ID: 33728551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Postablation cerebral embolisms in balloon-based atrial fibrillation ablation with periprocedural direct oral anticoagulants: A comparison between cryoballoon and HotBalloon ablation.
Nakamura K; Sasaki T; Take Y; Okazaki Y; Inoue M; Motoda H; Miki Y; Niijima K; Yamashita E; Koyama K; Funabashi N; Naito S
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 30288849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predictors of durable electrical isolation in the setting of second-generation cryoballoon ablation: A comparison between left superior, left inferior, right superior, and right inferior pulmonary veins.
Scala O; Borio G; Paparella G; Varnavas V; Ströker E; Guimaraes Osorio T; Terasawa M; Sieira J; Maj R; Rizzo A; Al-Hosari MM; Galli A; Brugada P; de Asmundis C; Chierchia GB
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2020 Jan; 31(1):128-136. PubMed ID: 31749209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of energy source on early atrial fibrillation recurrences: a comparison of cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency current energy ablation with the endpoint of unexcitability in pulmonary vein isolation.
Gunawardene MA; Hoffmann BA; Schaeffer B; Chung DU; Moser J; Akbulak RO; Jularic M; Eickholt C; Nuehrich J; Meyer C; Willems S
Europace; 2018 Jan; 20(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 27742775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ultra-high-density mapping of conduction gaps and atrial tachycardias: Distinctive patterns following pulmonary vein isolation with cryoballoon or contact-force-guided radiofrequency current.
Gunawardene MA; Eickholt C; Akbulak RÖ; Jularic M; Klatt N; Hartmann J; Schlüter M; Meyer C; Willems S; Schaeffer B
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2020 May; 31(5):1051-1061. PubMed ID: 32107811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pulmonary Vein Stenosis After Second-Generation Cryoballoon Ablation.
Matsuda J; Miyazaki S; Nakamura H; Taniguchi H; Kajiyama T; Hachiya H; Takagi T; Iesaka Y; Hirao K; Isobe M
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2017 Mar; 28(3):298-303. PubMed ID: 28032927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The second generation cryoballoon has improved durable isolation of left but not right pulmonary veins: new insights from a multicentre study.
Martins RP; Galand V; Cesari O; Milhem A; Behar N; Auffret V; Daubert JC; Mabo P; Pavin D
Europace; 2018 Jul; 20(7):1115-1121. PubMed ID: 29016748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of pulmonary vein reconnection patterns after multielectrode phased radiofrequency- and cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation.
Wieczorek M; Sassani K; Hoeltgen R
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2020 Apr; 20(1):197. PubMed ID: 32326885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The importance of extrapulmonary vein triggers and atypical atrial flutter in atrial fibrillation recurrence after cryoablation: Insights from repeat ablation procedures.
Chang TY; Lo LW; Te ALD; Lin YJ; Chang SL; Hu YF; Chung FP; Chao TF; Liao JN; Tuan TC; Lin CY; Vicera JJ; Huang TC; Hoang MQ; Yamada S; Chen SA
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 30230088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of myocardial injury and inflammation after pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation between radiofrequency catheter ablation and cryoballoon ablation.
Yano M; Egami Y; Yanagawa K; Nakamura H; Matsuhiro Y; Yasumoto K; Tsuda M; Okamoto N; Tanaka A; Matsunaga-Lee Y; Yamato M; Shutta R; Nishino M; Tanouchi J
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2020 Jun; 31(6):1315-1322. PubMed ID: 32250506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multicenter Study of the Validity of Additional Freeze Cycles for Cryoballoon Ablation in Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: The AD-Balloon Study.
Miyamoto K; Doi A; Hasegawa K; Morita Y; Mishima T; Suzuki I; Kaseno K; Nakajima K; Kataoka N; Kamakura T; Wada M; Yamagata K; Ishibashi K; Inoue YY; Nagase S; Noda T; Aiba T; Asakura M; Izumi C; Noguchi T; Tada H; Takagi M; Yasuda S; Kusano KF
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2019 Jan; 12(1):e006989. PubMed ID: 30626209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Two-year clinical outcome after a single cryoballoon ablation procedure: A comparison of first- and second-generation cryoballoons.
Zhao A; Squara F; Marijon E; Thomas O
Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2017 Oct; 110(10):543-549. PubMed ID: 28958871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Incidence of early pulmonary vein reconnections using different energy sources for pulmonary vein isolation: Multielectrode phased radiofrequency vs second-generation cryoballoon.
Wieczorek M; Tajtaraghi S; Sassani K; Hoeltgen R
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Sep; 30(9):1428-1435. PubMed ID: 31111548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Incidence of silent cerebral infarctions after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation utilizing the second-generation cryoballoon.
Nakamura T; Okishige K; Kanazawa T; Yamashita M; Kawaguchi N; Kato N; Aoyagi H; Yamauchi Y; Sasano T; Hirao K
Europace; 2017 Oct; 19(10):1681-1688. PubMed ID: 27702854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Earliest pulmonary vein potential-guided cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation.
Mizutani Y; Kanashiro M; Makino Y; Satake A; Suzuki W; Kurobe M; Mizutani K; Ichimiya H; Uchida Y; Watanabe J; Ichimiya S; Inden Y; Murohara T
Heart Vessels; 2020 Feb; 35(2):232-238. PubMed ID: 31297640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
