These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32271029)

  • 1. Assessing heterogeneity and power in replications of psychological experiments.
    Schauer JM; Hedges LV
    Psychol Bull; 2020 Aug; 146(8):701-719. PubMed ID: 32271029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical analyses for studying replication: Meta-analytic perspectives.
    Hedges LV; Schauer JM
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Oct; 24(5):557-570. PubMed ID: 30070547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Challenges and suggestions for defining replication "success" when effects may be heterogeneous: Comment on Hedges and Schauer (2019).
    Mathur MB; VanderWeele TJ
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Oct; 24(5):571-575. PubMed ID: 31580141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The unappreciated heterogeneity of effect sizes: Implications for power, precision, planning of research, and replication.
    Kenny DA; Judd CM
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Oct; 24(5):578-589. PubMed ID: 30742474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When averaging goes wrong: The case for mixture model estimation in psychological science.
    Moreau D; Corballis MC
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Sep; 148(9):1615-1627. PubMed ID: 30489120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What meta-analyses reveal about the replicability of psychological research.
    Stanley TD; Carter EC; Doucouliagos H
    Psychol Bull; 2018 Dec; 144(12):1325-1346. PubMed ID: 30321017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is replication possible without fidelity?
    Ellefson MR; Oppenheimer DM
    Psychol Methods; 2023 Dec; 28(6):1446-1455. PubMed ID: 35049324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Heterogeneity in direct replications in psychology and its association with effect size.
    Olsson-Collentine A; Wicherts JM; van Assen MALM
    Psychol Bull; 2020 Oct; 146(10):922-940. PubMed ID: 32700942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. "What meta-analyses reveal about the replicability of psychological research": Correction to Stanley, Carter, and Doucouliagos (2018).
    Psychol Bull; 2019 Jul; 145(7):764. PubMed ID: 31192651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Examining replicability in addictions research: How to assess and ways forward.
    Pearson MR; Schwebel FJ; Richards DK; Witkiewitz K
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2022 May; 36(3):260-270. PubMed ID: 34435835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Methodological and conceptual issues regarding occupational psychosocial coronary heart disease epidemiology.
    Burr H; Formazin M; Pohrt A
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2016 May; 42(3):251-5. PubMed ID: 26960179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reconsideration of the type I error rate for psychological science in the era of replication.
    Carlin MT; Costello MS; Flansburg MA; Darden A
    Psychol Methods; 2024 Apr; 29(2):379-387. PubMed ID: 35404627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Addressing the "Replication Crisis": Using Original Studies to Design Replication Studies with Appropriate Statistical Power.
    Anderson SF; Maxwell SE
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(3):305-324. PubMed ID: 28266872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does "failure to replicate" really mean?
    Maxwell SE; Lau MY; Howard GS
    Am Psychol; 2015 Sep; 70(6):487-98. PubMed ID: 26348332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reconsidering statistical methods for assessing replication.
    Schauer JM; Hedges LV
    Psychol Methods; 2021 Feb; 26(1):127-139. PubMed ID: 33617275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Heterogeneity of Research Results: A New Perspective From Which to Assess and Promote Progress in Psychological Science.
    Linden AH; Hönekopp J
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2021 Mar; 16(2):358-376. PubMed ID: 33400613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Review of Multisite Replication Projects in Social Psychology: Is It Viable to Sustain Any Confidence in Social Psychology's Knowledge Base?
    Baumeister RF; Tice DM; Bushman BJ
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2023 Jul; 18(4):912-935. PubMed ID: 36442681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Internal conceptual replications do not increase independent replication success.
    Kunert R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1631-1638. PubMed ID: 27068542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.
    Open Science Collaboration
    Science; 2015 Aug; 349(6251):aac4716. PubMed ID: 26315443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Replication and robustness in developmental research.
    Duncan GJ; Engel M; Claessens A; Dowsett CJ
    Dev Psychol; 2014 Nov; 50(11):2417-25. PubMed ID: 25243330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.