These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32271063)
61. Dissociating expectancy-based and experience-based control in task switching. Liu C; Yeung N J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Feb; 46(2):131-154. PubMed ID: 31985251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Inhibition of irrelevant response codes is affected by matching target-distractor modalities. Möller M; Mayr S; Buchner A J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Feb; 45(2):189-208. PubMed ID: 30589356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Voluntary Attentional Orienting in Schoolchildren: How Visual Orienting Skills Change During Primary School. Commodari E Percept Mot Skills; 2016 Jun; 122(3):855-70. PubMed ID: 27226225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Item and category-based attentional control during search for real-world objects: Can you find the pants among the pans? Nako R; Wu R; Smith TJ; Eimer M J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1283-8. PubMed ID: 24820441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Performance feedback promotes proactive but not reactive adaptation of conflict-control. Bejjani C; Tan S; Egner T J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Apr; 46(4):369-387. PubMed ID: 32223290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. The effects of divided attention and of stimulus repetition on item-item binding in verbal working memory. Peterson DJ; Decker R; Naveh-Benjamin M J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Nov; 45(11):1955-1969. PubMed ID: 30869953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Learned distractor rejection in the face of strong target guidance. Stilwell BT; Vecera SP J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Sep; 46(9):926-941. PubMed ID: 32391708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Linguistic predictability influences auditory stimulus classification within two concurrent speech streams. Szalárdy O; Tóth B; Farkas D; Orosz G; Honbolygó F; Winkler I Psychophysiology; 2020 May; 57(5):e13547. PubMed ID: 32052468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Zooming in on the cause of the perceptual load effect in the go/no-go paradigm. Chen Z; Cave KR J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1072-87. PubMed ID: 26820251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Executive and arousal vigilance decrement in the context of the attentional networks: The ANTI-Vea task. Luna FG; Marino J; Roca J; Lupiáñez J J Neurosci Methods; 2018 Aug; 306():77-87. PubMed ID: 29791865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Contingent attentional capture across multiple feature dimensions in a temporal search task. Ito M; Kawahara JI Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Jan; 163():107-13. PubMed ID: 26637932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. When shorter delays lead to worse memories: Task disruption makes visual working memory temporarily vulnerable to test interference. Wang B; Theeuwes J; Olivers CNL J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 May; 44(5):722-733. PubMed ID: 29094991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. The development of endogenous orienting: control over the scope of attention and lateral asymmetries. Wainwright A; Bryson SE Dev Neuropsychol; 2005; 27(2):237-55. PubMed ID: 15753048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Anxiety sensitivity and the anticipation of predictable and unpredictable threat: Evidence from the startle response and event-related potentials. Nelson BD; Hodges A; Hajcak G; Shankman SA J Anxiety Disord; 2015 Jun; 33():62-71. PubMed ID: 26005838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Phasic alerting enhances spatial orienting in healthy aging but not in mild cognitive impairment. Karpouzian-Rogers T; Heindel WC; Ott BR; Tremont G; Festa EK Neuropsychology; 2020 Feb; 34(2):144-154. PubMed ID: 31464472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Control of spatial orienting: context-specific proportion cued effects in an exogenous spatial cueing task. Gough A; Garcia J; Torres-Quesada M; Milliken B Conscious Cogn; 2014 Nov; 30():220-33. PubMed ID: 25313965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Testing the limits of the Perruchet effect in choice response time tasks. Lee Cheong Lem VA; Harris JA; Livesey EJ J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Oct; 41(4):385-94. PubMed ID: 26301613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Hypervigilance during anxiety and selective attention during fear: Using steady-state visual evoked potentials (ssVEPs) to disentangle attention mechanisms during predictable and unpredictable threat. Kastner-Dorn AK; Andreatta M; Pauli P; Wieser MJ Cortex; 2018 Sep; 106():120-131. PubMed ID: 29929061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Parsing the intrinsic networks underlying attention: a resting state study. Visintin E; De Panfilis C; Antonucci C; Capecci C; Marchesi C; Sambataro F Behav Brain Res; 2015 Feb; 278():315-22. PubMed ID: 25311282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. How attentional boost interacts with reward: the effect of dopaminergic medications in Parkinson's disease. Kéri S; Nagy H; Levy-Gigi E; Kelemen O Eur J Neurosci; 2013 Dec; 38(11):3650-8. PubMed ID: 24011183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]