These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32271064)

  • 1. Disambiguating the ambiguity disadvantage effect: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for semantic competition.
    Maciejewski G; Klepousniotou E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1682-1700. PubMed ID: 32271064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Semantic Ambiguity: Do Multiple Meanings Inhibit or Facilitate Word Recognition?
    Haro J; Ferré P
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2018 Jun; 47(3):679-698. PubMed ID: 29280032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. To mind the mind: an event-related potential study of word class and semantic ambiguity.
    Lee CL; Federmeier KD
    Brain Res; 2006 Apr; 1081(1):191-202. PubMed ID: 16516169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sustained meaning activation for polysemous but not homonymous words: evidence from EEG.
    MacGregor LJ; Bouwsema J; Klepousniotou E
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Feb; 68():126-38. PubMed ID: 25576909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An event-related potential investigation of the influence of bilingualism on disambiguating homonyms in older adults.
    Kousaie S; Taler V
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2024 Jun; 78(2):67-80. PubMed ID: 38635202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The closer they are, the more they interfere: Semantic similarity of word distractors increases competition in language production.
    Rose SB; Aristei S; Melinger A; Abdel Rahman R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(4):753-763. PubMed ID: 29975074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How meaning similarity influences ambiguous word processing: the current state of the literature.
    Eddington CM; Tokowicz N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Feb; 22(1):13-37. PubMed ID: 24889119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Listeners and readers generalize their experience with word meanings across modalities.
    Gilbert RA; Davis MH; Gaskell MG; Rodd JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Oct; 44(10):1533-1561. PubMed ID: 29389181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Semantic ambiguity processing in sentence context: Evidence from event-related fMRI.
    Zempleni MZ; Renken R; Hoeks JC; Hoogduin JM; Stowe LA
    Neuroimage; 2007 Feb; 34(3):1270-9. PubMed ID: 17142061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Semantic ambiguity and the process of generating meaning from print.
    Pexman PM; Hino Y; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Nov; 30(6):1252-70. PubMed ID: 15521802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Probing Lexical Ambiguity: Word Vectors Encode Number and Relatedness of Senses.
    Beekhuizen B; Armstrong BC; Stevenson S
    Cogn Sci; 2021 May; 45(5):e12943. PubMed ID: 34018227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrophysiological and behavioral correlates of stable automatic semantic retrieval in aging.
    Grieder M; Crinelli RM; Koenig T; Wahlund LO; Dierks T; Wirth M
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jan; 50(1):160-71. PubMed ID: 22133494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Semantic adaptation and competition during word comprehension.
    Bedny M; McGill M; Thompson-Schill SL
    Cereb Cortex; 2008 Nov; 18(11):2574-85. PubMed ID: 18308708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interactions of lexical and conceptual representations: Evidence from EEG.
    Eviatar Z; Binur N; Peleg O
    Brain Lang; 2023 Aug; 243():105302. PubMed ID: 37437410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The semantic processing of syntactic structure in sentence comprehension: an ERP study.
    Ye Z; Zhan W; Zhou X
    Brain Res; 2007 Apr; 1142():135-45. PubMed ID: 17303093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modulation of the N400 component in relation to hypomanic personality traits in a word meaning ambiguity resolution task.
    Raucher-Chéné D; Terrien S; Gobin P; Gierski F; Kaladjian A; Besche-Richard C
    Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2017 Sep; 71(9):637-646. PubMed ID: 28457018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of semantic matching and of semantic category on reaction time and N400 that resist numerous repetitions.
    Debruille JB; Renoult L
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(2):506-17. PubMed ID: 18983862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
    Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The semantic origin of unconscious priming: Behavioral and event-related potential evidence during category congruency priming from strongly and weakly related masked words.
    Ortells JJ; Kiefer M; Castillo A; Megías M; Morillas A
    Cognition; 2016 Jan; 146():143-57. PubMed ID: 26412392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cross-language activation and executive control modulate within-language ambiguity resolution: Evidence from eye movements.
    Palma P; Whitford V; Titone D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Mar; 46(3):507-528. PubMed ID: 31282724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.