139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32271577)
1. Structure- and Ligand-Based Virtual Screening on DUD-E
Cleves AE; Jain AN
J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Sep; 60(9):4296-4310. PubMed ID: 32271577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electrostatic-field and surface-shape similarity for virtual screening and pose prediction.
Cleves AE; Johnson SR; Jain AN
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Oct; 33(10):865-886. PubMed ID: 31650386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. PoLi: A Virtual Screening Pipeline Based on Template Pocket and Ligand Similarity.
Roy A; Srinivasan B; Skolnick J
J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Aug; 55(8):1757-70. PubMed ID: 26225536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Surflex-Dock: Docking benchmarks and real-world application.
Spitzer R; Jain AN
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2012 Jun; 26(6):687-99. PubMed ID: 22569590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ligity: A Non-Superpositional, Knowledge-Based Approach to Virtual Screening.
Ebejer JP; Finn PW; Wong WK; Deane CM; Morris GM
J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Jun; 59(6):2600-2616. PubMed ID: 31117509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. SPOT-Ligand: Fast and effective structure-based virtual screening by binding homology search according to ligand and receptor similarity.
Yang Y; Zhan J; Zhou Y
J Comput Chem; 2016 Jul; 37(18):1734-9. PubMed ID: 27074979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of several molecular docking programs: pose prediction and virtual screening accuracy.
Cross JB; Thompson DC; Rai BK; Baber JC; Fan KY; Hu Y; Humblet C
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jun; 49(6):1455-74. PubMed ID: 19476350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ligand-Binding-Site Refinement to Generate Reliable Holo Protein Structure Conformations from Apo Structures.
Guterres H; Park SJ; Jiang W; Im W
J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Jan; 61(1):535-546. PubMed ID: 33337877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using consensus-shape clustering to identify promiscuous ligands and protein targets and to choose the right query for shape-based virtual screening.
Pérez-Nueno VI; Ritchie DW
J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Jun; 51(6):1233-48. PubMed ID: 21604699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. FRAGSITE: A Fragment-Based Approach for Virtual Ligand Screening.
Zhou H; Cao H; Skolnick J
J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Apr; 61(4):2074-2089. PubMed ID: 33724022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Benchmark of four popular virtual screening programs: construction of the active/decoy dataset remains a major determinant of measured performance.
Chaput L; Martinez-Sanz J; Saettel N; Mouawad L
J Cheminform; 2016; 8():56. PubMed ID: 27803745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. PLHINT: A knowledge-driven computational approach based on the intermolecular H bond interactions at the protein-ligand interface from docking solutions.
Kumar SP
J Mol Graph Model; 2018 Jan; 79():194-212. PubMed ID: 29241118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A new protein binding pocket similarity measure based on comparison of clouds of atoms in 3D: application to ligand prediction.
Hoffmann B; Zaslavskiy M; Vert JP; Stoven V
BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Feb; 11():99. PubMed ID: 20175916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: considering protein structural variations in molecular docking.
Huang SY; Zou X
Proteins; 2007 Feb; 66(2):399-421. PubMed ID: 17096427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Knowledge-guided docking: accurate prospective prediction of bound configurations of novel ligands using Surflex-Dock.
Cleves AE; Jain AN
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2015 Jun; 29(6):485-509. PubMed ID: 25940276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. FINDSITE
Zhou H; Cao H; Skolnick J
J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Nov; 58(11):2343-2354. PubMed ID: 30278128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multiple structures for virtual ligand screening: defining binding site properties-based criteria to optimize the selection of the query.
Ben Nasr N; Guillemain H; Lagarde N; Zagury JF; Montes M
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Feb; 53(2):293-311. PubMed ID: 23312043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimization of compound ranking for structure-based virtual ligand screening using an established FRED-Surflex consensus approach.
Du J; Bleylevens IW; Bitorina AV; Wichapong K; Nicolaes GA
Chem Biol Drug Des; 2014 Jan; 83(1):37-51. PubMed ID: 23941463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fast structure-based virtual ligand screening combining FRED, DOCK, and Surflex.
Miteva MA; Lee WH; Montes MO; Villoutreix BO
J Med Chem; 2005 Sep; 48(19):6012-22. PubMed ID: 16162004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Integrating ligand-based and protein-centric virtual screening of kinase inhibitors using ensembles of multiple protein kinase genes and conformations.
Dixit A; Verkhivker GM
J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Oct; 52(10):2501-15. PubMed ID: 22992037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
