These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32272106)

  • 1. Novel Effect Size Interpretation Guidelines and an Evaluation of Statistical Power in Rehabilitation Research.
    Kinney AR; Eakman AM; Graham JE
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2020 Dec; 101(12):2219-2226. PubMed ID: 32272106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An Examination of Effect Sizes and Statistical Power in Speech, Language, and Hearing Research.
    Gaeta L; Brydges CR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 May; 63(5):1572-1580. PubMed ID: 32343919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect Size Guidelines, Sample Size Calculations, and Statistical Power in Gerontology.
    Brydges CR
    Innov Aging; 2019 Aug; 3(4):igz036. PubMed ID: 31528719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating the Strength of Evidence in Favor of Rehabilitation Effects: A Bayesian Analysis.
    Kinney AR; Middleton A; Graham JE
    Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2022 Jan; 65(1):101503. PubMed ID: 33667720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Statistical considerations for reporting and planning heart rate variability case-control studies.
    Quintana DS
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Mar; 54(3):344-349. PubMed ID: 27914167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Bayesian analysis of non-significant rehabilitation findings: Evaluating the evidence in favour of truly absent treatment effects.
    Kinney AR; Middleton A; Graham JE
    Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2021 Jul; 64(4):101425. PubMed ID: 32805456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Statistical Inferences Using Effect Sizes in Human Endothelial Function Research.
    Cherubini JM; MacDonald MJ
    Artery Res; 2021; 27(4):176-185. PubMed ID: 34966462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Redefining effect size interpretations for psychotherapy RCTs in depression.
    Nordahl-Hansen A; Cogo-Moreira H; Panjeh S; Quintana DS
    J Psychiatr Res; 2024 Jan; 169():38-41. PubMed ID: 38000182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical power of clinical trials increased while effect size remained stable: an empirical analysis of 136,212 clinical trials between 1975 and 2014.
    Lamberink HJ; Otte WM; Sinke MRT; Lakens D; Glasziou PP; Tijdink JK; Vinkers CH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Oct; 102():123-128. PubMed ID: 29981870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: quantifying the risks of false-positives and false-negatives.
    Brookes ST; Whitley E; Peters TJ; Mulheran PA; Egger M; Davey Smith G
    Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(33):1-56. PubMed ID: 11701102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Power, effects, confidence, and significance: an investigation of statistical practices in nursing research.
    Gaskin CJ; Happell B
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2014 May; 51(5):795-806. PubMed ID: 24207028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Revisiting the Sample Size and Statistical Power of Randomized Controlled Trials in Orthopaedics After 2 Decades.
    Reito A; Raittio L; Helminen O
    JBJS Rev; 2020 Feb; 8(2):e0079. PubMed ID: 32224628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Moving Forward to a World Beyond 0.2, 0.5, and 0.8 Effects Sizes: New Cutoffs for School-Based Anti-Bullying Interventions.
    Panjeh S; Nordahl-Hansen A; Cogo-Moreira H
    J Interpers Violence; 2023 Jun; 38(11-12):7843-7851. PubMed ID: 36601910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Statistical power and effect sizes of clinical neuropsychology research.
    Bezeau S; Graves R
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2001 Jun; 23(3):399-406. PubMed ID: 11419453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Many meta-analyses of rare events in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were underpowered.
    Jia P; Lin L; Kwong JSW; Xu C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Mar; 131():113-122. PubMed ID: 33271288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sample size of surgical randomized controlled trials: a lack of improvement over time.
    Ahmed Ali U; Ten Hove JR; Reiber BM; van der Sluis PC; Besselink MG
    J Surg Res; 2018 Aug; 228():1-7. PubMed ID: 29907196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Power of mental health nursing research: a statistical analysis of studies in the International Journal of Mental Health Nursing.
    Gaskin CJ; Happell B
    Int J Ment Health Nurs; 2013 Feb; 22(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 22738423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Statistical power of negative randomized controlled trials presented at American Society for Clinical Oncology annual meetings.
    Bedard PL; Krzyzanowska MK; Pintilie M; Tannock IF
    J Clin Oncol; 2007 Aug; 25(23):3482-7. PubMed ID: 17687153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.