These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32272106)

  • 21. Satisfied conclusion validity of early intervention research with handicapped children.
    Ottenbacher KJ
    Except Child; 1989 Apr; 55(6):534-40. PubMed ID: 2522878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The impact of study size on meta-analyses: examination of underpowered studies in Cochrane reviews.
    Turner RM; Bird SM; Higgins JP
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e59202. PubMed ID: 23544056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Got power? A systematic review of sample size adequacy in health professions education research.
    Cook DA; Hatala R
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2015 Mar; 20(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 24819405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Alpha values as a function of sample size, effect size, and power: accuracy over inference.
    Bradley MT; Brand A
    Psychol Rep; 2013 Jun; 112(3):835-44. PubMed ID: 24245076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Caution regarding the choice of standard deviations to guide sample size calculations in clinical trials.
    Chen H; Zhang N; Lu X; Chen S
    Clin Trials; 2013 Aug; 10(4):522-9. PubMed ID: 23794405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Methodological reporting behavior, sample sizes, and statistical power in studies of event-related potentials: Barriers to reproducibility and replicability.
    Clayson PE; Carbine KA; Baldwin SA; Larson MJ
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Nov; 56(11):e13437. PubMed ID: 31322285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Flaws in the application and interpretation of statistical analyses in systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions were common: a cross-sectional analysis.
    Page MJ; Altman DG; McKenzie JE; Shamseer L; Ahmadzai N; Wolfe D; Yazdi F; Catalá-López F; Tricco AC; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Mar; 95():7-18. PubMed ID: 29203419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Considerations of power and sample size in rehabilitation research.
    Boukrina O; Kucukboyaci NE; Dobryakova E
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2020 Aug; 154():6-14. PubMed ID: 31655185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A systematic review of the reporting of sample size calculations and corresponding data components in observational functional magnetic resonance imaging studies.
    Guo Q; Thabane L; Hall G; McKinnon M; Goeree R; Pullenayegum E
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 86():172-81. PubMed ID: 23954487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect sizes in memory research.
    Morris PE; Fritz CO
    Memory; 2013; 21(7):832-42. PubMed ID: 23350788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Improving Power and Sample Size Calculation in Rehabilitation Trial Reports: A Methodological Assessment.
    Castellini G; Gianola S; Bonovas S; Moja L
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2016 Jul; 97(7):1195-201. PubMed ID: 26971671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Statistical power in clinical trials of interventions for mood, anxiety, and psychotic disorders.
    de Vries YA; Schoevers RA; Higgins JPT; Munafò MR; Bastiaansen JA
    Psychol Med; 2023 Jul; 53(10):4499-4506. PubMed ID: 35588241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Power of Low Back Pain Trials: A Systematic Review of Power, Sample Size, and Reporting of Sample Size Calculations Over Time, in Trials Published Between 1980 and 2012.
    Froud R; Rajendran D; Patel S; Bright P; Bjørkli T; Eldridge S; Buchbinder R; Underwood M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Jun; 42(11):E680-E686. PubMed ID: 27792111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sample size and statistical power of randomised, controlled trials in orthopaedics.
    Freedman KB; Back S; Bernstein J
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2001 Apr; 83(3):397-402. PubMed ID: 11341427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Recalibrating expectations about effect size: A multi-method survey of effect sizes in the ABCD study.
    Owens MM; Potter A; Hyatt CS; Albaugh M; Thompson WK; Jernigan T; Yuan D; Hahn S; Allgaier N; Garavan H
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0257535. PubMed ID: 34555056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sample size calculations in surgery: are they done correctly?
    Maggard MA; O'Connell JB; Liu JH; Etzioni DA; Ko CY
    Surgery; 2003 Aug; 134(2):275-9. PubMed ID: 12947329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect size guidelines for cross-lagged effects.
    Orth U; Meier LL; Bühler JL; Dapp LC; Krauss S; Messerli D; Robins RW
    Psychol Methods; 2024 Apr; 29(2):421-433. PubMed ID: 35737548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Statistical Power and Swallowing Rehabilitation Research: Current Landscape and Next Steps.
    Borders JC; Grande AA; Troche MS
    Dysphagia; 2022 Dec; 37(6):1673-1688. PubMed ID: 35226185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Empirical evaluation of very large treatment effects of medical interventions.
    Pereira TV; Horwitz RI; Ioannidis JP
    JAMA; 2012 Oct; 308(16):1676-84. PubMed ID: 23093165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.