132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32272305)
1. Adjusting posterior probabilities to meet predefined accuracy criteria: A proposal for a novel approach to osteometric sex estimation.
Jerković I; Bašić Ž; Anđelinović Š; Kružić I
Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Jun; 311():110273. PubMed ID: 32272305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sexual dimorphism of the tibia in contemporary Greek-Cypriots and Cretans: Forensic applications.
Kranioti EK; García-Donas JG; Almeida Prado PS; Kyriakou XP; Langstaff HC
Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Feb; 271():129.e1-129.e7. PubMed ID: 27919515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sex estimation standards for medieval and contemporary Croats.
Bašić Ž; Kružić I; Jerković I; Anđelinović D; Anđelinović Š
Croat Med J; 2017 Jun; 58(3):222-230. PubMed ID: 28613039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Metric sex estimation from the postcranial skeleton for the Colombian population.
Moore MK; DiGangi EA; Niño Ruíz FP; Hidalgo Davila OJ; Sanabria Medina C
Forensic Sci Int; 2016 May; 262():286.e1-8. PubMed ID: 27032896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Testing the validity of population-specific sex estimation equations: An evaluation based on talus and patella measurements.
Indra L; Vach W; Desideri J; Besse M; Pichler SL
Sci Justice; 2021 Sep; 61(5):555-563. PubMed ID: 34482935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Osteometric sex estimation from the os coxa in a Thai population.
Mahakkanukrauh P; Ruengdit S; Tun SM; Case DT; Sinthubua A
Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Feb; 271():127.e1-127.e7. PubMed ID: 28062152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sexual dimorphism of the tibia in contemporary Greeks, Italians, and Spanish: forensic implications.
Kranioti EF; Apostol MA
Int J Legal Med; 2015 Mar; 129(2):357-63. PubMed ID: 25047696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A new computer-tomography-based method of sex estimation: Development of Turkish population-specific standards.
Gulhan O; Harrison K; Kiris A
Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Oct; 255():2-8. PubMed ID: 26250530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prioritizing a high posterior probability threshold leading to low error rate over high classification accuracy: the validity of MorphoPASSE software for cranial morphological sex estimation in a contemporary population.
Pilmann Kotěrová A; Santos F; Bejdová Š; Rmoutilová R; Attia MH; Habiba A; Velemínská J; Brůžek J
Int J Legal Med; 2024 Jul; 138(4):1759-1768. PubMed ID: 38532206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sexual dimorphism in ulna: an osteometric study from India.
Srivastava R; Saini V; Rai RK; Pandey S; Singh TB; Tripathi SK; Pandey AK
J Forensic Sci; 2013 Sep; 58(5):1251-1256. PubMed ID: 23718819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Osteometric sex discrimination from the sternal extremity of the fourth rib in a recent forensic sample from Southwestern Spain.
Macaluso PJ; Rico A; Santos M; Lucena J
Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Nov; 223(1-3):375.e1-5. PubMed ID: 23068090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimation of sex based on metrics of the sternum in a contemporary Jordanian population: A computed tomographic study.
Kalbouneh H; Mubarak N; Daradkeh S; Ashour O; Alkhatib AM; Suboh L; Nofal A; Mahafzah W; Alsalem M
Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Dec; 100(49):e28169. PubMed ID: 34889290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Osteometric analysis for sexing of modern sternum - an autopsy study from South India.
Chandrakanth HV; Kanchan T; Krishan K
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2014 Nov; 16(6):350-6. PubMed ID: 25127732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Accuracy of Sex Estimation on Metatarsal Bones in a Northeastern Thai Population.
Phatsara M; Das S; Laowatthanaphong S; Tuamsuk P; Mahakkanukrauh P
Clin Ter; 2016; 167(3):72-6. PubMed ID: 27424506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation and reliability of the sex estimation of the human os coxae using freely available DSP2 software for bioarchaeology and forensic anthropology.
Brůžek J; Santos F; Dutailly B; Murail P; Cunha E
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2017 Oct; 164(2):440-449. PubMed ID: 28714560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sex estimation from the mastoid process among North Indians.
Saini V; Srivastava R; Rai RK; Shamal SN; Singh TB; Tripathi SK
J Forensic Sci; 2012 Mar; 57(2):434-9. PubMed ID: 22103755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A review of sex estimation techniques during examination of skeletal remains in forensic anthropology casework.
Krishan K; Chatterjee PM; Kanchan T; Kaur S; Baryah N; Singh RK
Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Apr; 261():165.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26926105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sex estimation in a modern American osteological sample using a discriminant function analysis from the calcaneus.
DiMichele DL; Spradley MK
Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Sep; 221(1-3):152.e1-5. PubMed ID: 22512944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy Rates of Sex Estimation by Forensic Anthropologists through Comparison with DNA Typing Results in Forensic Casework.
Thomas RM; Parks CL; Richard AH
J Forensic Sci; 2016 Sep; 61(5):1307-10. PubMed ID: 27352918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acetabular osteometric standards for sex estimation in contemporary Croatian population.
Bubalo P; Baković M; Tkalčić M; Petrovečki V; Mayer D
Croat Med J; 2019 Jun; 60(3):221-226. PubMed ID: 31187949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
