180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32272512)
1. Safety of Combining Facial Lifting With Suspension Threads and Microfocused Ultrasound With Visualization.
Casabona G
J Drugs Dermatol; 2020 Apr; 19(4):367-370. PubMed ID: 32272512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Retrospective evaluation of micro-focused ultrasound for lifting and tightening the face and neck.
Fabi SG; Goldman MP
Dermatol Surg; 2014 May; 40(5):569-75. PubMed ID: 24689931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative Analysis of Face and Neck Skin Tightening by Microfocused Ultrasound With Visualization in Asians.
Lu PH; Yang CH; Chang YC
Dermatol Surg; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1332-1338. PubMed ID: 28945618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing the Safety and Effectiveness of Microfocused Ultrasound: Standard vs Targeted Tissue Protocol in Lifting and Tightening the Lower Face and Upper Neck.
Wood E; Gonzalez A; Almukhtar R; Fletcher L; Fabi S
J Drugs Dermatol; 2024 Apr; 23(4):249-254. PubMed ID: 38564386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Randomized, Split-Face, Evaluator-Blind Clinical Trial Comparing Monopolar Radiofrequency Versus Microfocused Ultrasound With Visualization for Lifting and Tightening of the Face and Upper Neck.
Alhaddad M; Wu DC; Bolton J; Wilson MJ; Jones IT; Boen M; Goldman MP
Dermatol Surg; 2019 Jan; 45(1):131-139. PubMed ID: 30531187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of Micro-Focused Ultrasound for Lifting and Tightening Neck Laxity.
Baumann L; Zelickson B
J Drugs Dermatol; 2016 May; 15(5):607-14. PubMed ID: 27168269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Safety of Microfocused Ultrasound With Visualization in Patients With Fitzpatrick Skin Phototypes III to VI.
Harris MO; Sundaram HA
JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2015; 17(5):355-7. PubMed ID: 26313402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Systematic Review of the Efficacy of Microfocused Ultrasound for Facial Skin Tightening.
Contini M; Hollander MHJ; Vissink A; Schepers RH; Jansma J; Schortinghuis J
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Jan; 20(2):. PubMed ID: 36674277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Randomized Evaluator-Blinded Trial Comparing Subsurface Monopolar Radiofrequency With Microfocused Ultrasound for Lifting and Tightening of the Neck.
Jones IT; Guiha I; Goldman MP; Wu DC
Dermatol Surg; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1441-1447. PubMed ID: 28902019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Facial Skin Tightening With Microfocused Ultrasound and Dermal Fillers: Considerations for Patient Selection and Outcomes.
Casabona G; Kaye K
J Drugs Dermatol; 2019 Nov; 18(11):1075-1082. PubMed ID: 31738490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patient satisfaction of microfocused ultrasound treatments on the face and neck laxity: A narrative review.
Al-Omair A; Bukhari A
J Cosmet Dermatol; 2023 Oct; 22(10):2671-2676. PubMed ID: 37128835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Absorbable Suspension Sutures: Recommendations for Use in a Multimodal Nonsurgical Approach to Facial Rejuvenation.
Fabi SG; Weiss R; Weinkle SH
J Drugs Dermatol; 2021 Jan; 20(1):23-29. PubMed ID: 33400414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Topical Transdermally Delivered Lidocaine and Benzocaine Compared to Compounded Lidocaine/Tetracaine During Microfocused Ultrasound With Visualization Treatment.
Palm MD; Misell LM
J Drugs Dermatol; 2018 Jul; 17(7):729-734. PubMed ID: 30005094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combination of Calcium Hydroxylapatite Diluted With Normal Saline and Microfocused Ultrasound With Visualization for Skin Tightening.
Yutskovskaya YA; Sergeeva AD; Kogan EA
J Drugs Dermatol; 2020 Apr; 19(4):405-411. PubMed ID: 32272518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient Satisfaction Following Treatment With Microfocused Ultrasound With Visualization: Results of a Retrospective Cross-Sectional Survey.
Montes JR; Santos E
J Drugs Dermatol; 2019 Jan; 18(1):75-79. PubMed ID: 30681800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimizing Patient Outcomes by Customizing Treatment With Microfocused Ultrasound With Visualization: Gold Standard Consensus Guidelines from an Expert Panel.
Fabi SG; Joseph J; Sevi J; Green JB; Peterson JD
J Drugs Dermatol; 2019 May; 18(5):426-432. PubMed ID: 31141851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of a high-intensity focused ultrasound device with and without real-time visualization system in face and neck treatment of skin laxity.
Vachiramon V; Techakajornkeart R; Leerunyakul K; Chayavichitsilp P
J Cosmet Dermatol; 2021 Jan; 20(1):132-137. PubMed ID: 32474997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combined Calcium Hydroxylapatite Plus Microfocused Ultrasound for Treating Skin Laxity of the Chest and Buttocks.
Casabona G
J Drugs Dermatol; 2022 Jan; 21(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 35005869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of microfocused ultrasound with visualization for lifting, tightening, and wrinkle reduction of the décolletage.
Fabi SG; Massaki A; Eimpunth S; Pogoda J; Goldman MP
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2013 Dec; 69(6):965-71. PubMed ID: 24054759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical Trial Evaluating the Long-Term Efficacy of Microfocused Ultrasound With Visualization for Décolleté Rejuvenation.
Fabi SG; Boen M; Alhaddad M; Goldman MP
J Drugs Dermatol; 2020 Nov; 19(11):1026-1029. PubMed ID: 33196752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
