136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32272871)
1. Clinical and scientific expert witness bias: Sources and expression.
Forrester A
Med Sci Law; 2020 Apr; 60(2):159-160. PubMed ID: 32272871
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. 6th Czech-Slovak Congress of Forensic Medicine with International Participation 12-13 April 2018, České Budějovice, Czech.
Skowronek R
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2018; 68(2):157-160. PubMed ID: 30509026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Use and abuse of medicolegal and forensic scientific expert testimony in the courtroom.
Wecht CH
Med Law; 1996; 15(1):43-63. PubMed ID: 8692000
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Promoting ethical and objective practice in the medicolegal arena of disability evaluation.
Martelli MF; Zasler ND; Johnson-Greene D
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2001 Aug; 12(3):571-85. PubMed ID: 11478189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On humanizing the expert witness: a proposed narrative approach to expert witness qualification.
Commons ML; Gutheil TG; Hilliard JT
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2010; 38(3):302-4. PubMed ID: 20852213
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Causes célèbres. The Thomas Lund Lecture, delivered to the British Academy of Forensic Sciences on Tuesday 22 October 1991.
Usher A
Med Sci Law; 1992 Apr; 32(2):97-108. PubMed ID: 1614306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) and expert testimony.
Kulich R; Maciewicz R; Scrivani SJ
Pain Med; 2009 Mar; 10(2):373-80. PubMed ID: 19254335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Bibliography of the Polish papers on forensic medicine, criminology and related fields published in 2002].
Baran E
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2003; 53(3):257-75. PubMed ID: 14740629
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Standards in evidence.
Ebsworth E
Med Sci Law; 2001 Jan; 41(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 11219116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Doing forensic work, I: starting the case.
Reid WH
J Psychiatr Pract; 2012 Mar; 18(2):122-5. PubMed ID: 22418403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Practical measures to reduce medical expert witness bias.
Boyarsky S
J Forensic Sci; 1989 Sep; 34(5):1259-65. PubMed ID: 2809550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evolving legal standards for the admissibility of scientific evidence.
Black B
Science; 1988 Mar; 239(4847):1508-12. PubMed ID: 3281252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Psychological expert witness testimony and judicial decision making trends.
Shapiro DL; Mixon L; Jackson M; Shook J
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():149-53. PubMed ID: 26341310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lessons from Canadian Courts for All Expert Witnesses.
Booth BD; Watts J; Dufour M
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2019 Aug; 47(3):278-285. PubMed ID: 31097525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The inexpediency of using the term "iatrogenicity" in expert and legal practices].
Povzun SA; Ungurian VM; Demko AE
Sud Med Ekspert; 2013; 56(6):52-4. PubMed ID: 25474923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Expert witnesses.
Tribe GW
Vet Rec; 2003 Mar; 152(13):407. PubMed ID: 12696715
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Verbal conventions for handwriting opinions.
Evett IW
J Forensic Sci; 2000 Mar; 45(2):508-9. PubMed ID: 10782988
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Expert witnesses.
Jackson B
Vet Rec; 2003 Mar; 152(13):407-8. PubMed ID: 12696716
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Requiem for the "general acceptance" standard in forensic science.
Moenssens AA
Leg Med; 1982; ():275-87. PubMed ID: 7121185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Not Available].
Rygol K
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2015; 65(3):192-3. PubMed ID: 27333628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
