These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32272892)
1. A benchmark study of ab initio gene prediction methods in diverse eukaryotic organisms. Scalzitti N; Jeannin-Girardon A; Collet P; Poch O; Thompson JD BMC Genomics; 2020 Apr; 21(1):293. PubMed ID: 32272892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. CodingQuarry: highly accurate hidden Markov model gene prediction in fungal genomes using RNA-seq transcripts. Testa AC; Hane JK; Ellwood SR; Oliver RP BMC Genomics; 2015 Mar; 16(1):170. PubMed ID: 25887563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. GASS: genome structural annotation for Eukaryotes based on species similarity. Wang Y; Chen L; Song N; Lei X BMC Genomics; 2015 Mar; 16(1):150. PubMed ID: 25764973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cross-organism learning method to discover new gene functionalities. Domeniconi G; Masseroli M; Moro G; Pinoli P Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2016 Apr; 126():20-34. PubMed ID: 26724853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reduce manual curation by combining gene predictions from multiple annotation engines, a case study of start codon prediction. Ederveen TH; Overmars L; van Hijum SA PLoS One; 2013; 8(5):e63523. PubMed ID: 23675487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Addressing the pervasive scarcity of structural annotation in eukaryotic algae. Kwon T; Hanschen ER; Hovde BT Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):1687. PubMed ID: 36717613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mirnacle: machine learning with SMOTE and random forest for improving selectivity in pre-miRNA ab initio prediction. Marques YB; de Paiva Oliveira A; Ribeiro Vasconcelos AT; Cerqueira FR BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Dec; 17(Suppl 18):474. PubMed ID: 28105918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. TSSFinder-fast and accurate ab initio prediction of the core promoter in eukaryotic genomes. de Medeiros Oliveira M; Bonadio I; Lie de Melo A; Mendes Souza G; Durham AM Brief Bioinform; 2021 Nov; 22(6):. PubMed ID: 34050351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimating gene gain and loss rates in the presence of error in genome assembly and annotation using CAFE 3. Han MV; Thomas GW; Lugo-Martinez J; Hahn MW Mol Biol Evol; 2013 Aug; 30(8):1987-97. PubMed ID: 23709260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. AUGUSTUS at EGASP: using EST, protein and genomic alignments for improved gene prediction in the human genome. Stanke M; Tzvetkova A; Morgenstern B Genome Biol; 2006; 7 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S11.1-8. PubMed ID: 16925833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Machine learning for discovering missing or wrong protein function annotations : A comparison using updated benchmark datasets. Nakano FK; Lietaert M; Vens C BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Sep; 20(1):485. PubMed ID: 31547800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Training set selection for the prediction of essential genes. Cheng J; Xu Z; Wu W; Zhao L; Li X; Liu Y; Tao S PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e86805. PubMed ID: 24466248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improved strategy for the curation and classification of kinases, with broad applicability to other eukaryotic protein groups. Stroehlein AJ; Young ND; Gasser RB Sci Rep; 2018 May; 8(1):6808. PubMed ID: 29717207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combining RNA-seq data and homology-based gene prediction for plants, animals and fungi. Keilwagen J; Hartung F; Paulini M; Twardziok SO; Grau J BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 May; 19(1):189. PubMed ID: 29843602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. OrthoFiller: utilising data from multiple species to improve the completeness of genome annotations. Dunne MP; Kelly S BMC Genomics; 2017 May; 18(1):390. PubMed ID: 28521726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]