BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32274159)

  • 1. Comparison of the short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive, video-assisted minimally invasive, and open esophagectomy.
    Gong L; Jiang H; Yue J; Duan X; Tang P; Ren P; Zhao X; Liu X; Zhang X; Yu Z
    J Thorac Dis; 2020 Mar; 12(3):916-924. PubMed ID: 32274159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy really have the advantage of lymphadenectomy over video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? A propensity score-matched analysis based on short-term outcomes.
    Deng HY; Luo J; Li SX; Li G; Alai G; Wang Y; Liu LX; Lin YD
    Dis Esophagus; 2019 Jul; 32(7):. PubMed ID: 30496378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of short-term outcomes between robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy and video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating middle thoracic esophageal cancer.
    Deng HY; Huang WX; Li G; Li SX; Luo J; Alai G; Wang Y; Liu LX; Lin YD
    Dis Esophagus; 2018 Aug; 31(8):. PubMed ID: 29538633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted, Video-Assisted, and Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Mederos MA; de Virgilio MJ; Shenoy R; Ye L; Toste PA; Mak SS; Booth MS; Begashaw MM; Wilson M; Gunnar W; Shekelle PG; Maggard-Gibbons M; Girgis MD
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2129228. PubMed ID: 34724556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparisons of short-term outcomes between robot-assisted, video-assisted, and open esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant treatment: a retrospective study.
    Wu Z; Liu J; Zhang L; Tang M; Shu W; van der Wilk BJ; Anker CJ; He Z; Wang L; Lv W; Zhu L; Hu J
    J Thorac Dis; 2024 Mar; 16(3):2019-2031. PubMed ID: 38617777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis.
    He H; Wu Q; Wang Z; Zhang Y; Chen N; Fu J; Zhang G
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2018 May; 13(1):52. PubMed ID: 29792203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer compared with video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: A single-center retrospective study.
    Morimoto Y; Kawakubo H; Ishikawa A; Matsuda S; Hijikata N; Ando M; Mayanagi S; Irino T; Nakamura R; Wada N; Tsuji T; Kitagawa Y
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2022 Apr; 15(2):270-278. PubMed ID: 34637190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robot-assisted and conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy are associated with better postoperative results compared to hybrid and open transthoracic esophagectomy.
    van der Sluis PC; Babic B; Uzun E; Tagkalos E; Berlth F; Hadzijusufovic E; Lang H; Gockel I; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Apr; 48(4):776-782. PubMed ID: 34838394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Chen H; Liu Y; Peng H; Wang R; Wang K; Li D
    Transl Cancer Res; 2021 Nov; 10(11):4601-4616. PubMed ID: 35116317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for thoracic lymph node dissection in patients with squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective comparative cohort study.
    Lei J; Bai Y; Qiao Z; Ma J
    J Thorac Dis; 2024 Mar; 16(3):2115-2124. PubMed ID: 38617764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robotic assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Xue M; Liu J; Lu M; Zhang H; Liu W; Tian H
    Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1293645. PubMed ID: 38288099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Postoperative Outcomes in a Nationwide Cohort.
    Turner KM; Delman AM; Johnson K; Patel SH; Wilson GC; Shah SA; Van Haren RM
    J Surg Res; 2023 Mar; 283():152-160. PubMed ID: 36410231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does the Approach Matter? Comparing Survival in Robotic, Minimally Invasive, and Open Esophagectomies.
    Espinoza-Mercado F; Imai TA; Borgella JD; Sarkissian A; Serna-Gallegos D; Alban RF; Soukiasian HJ
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2019 Feb; 107(2):378-385. PubMed ID: 30312615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Essential updates 2020/2021: Recent topics in surgery and perioperative therapy for esophageal cancer.
    Ozawa S; Uchi Y; Ando T; Hayashi K; Aoki T
    Ann Gastroenterol Surg; 2023 May; 7(3):346-357. PubMed ID: 37152779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does robot-assisted minimally invasive oesophagectomy have superiority over thoraco-laparoscopic minimally invasive oesophagectomy in lymph node dissection?
    Li XK; Xu Y; Zhou H; Cong ZZ; Wu WJ; Qiang Y; Shen Y
    Dis Esophagus; 2021 Feb; 34(2):. PubMed ID: 32582945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lower Incidence of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications Following Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Propensity Score-Matched Comparison to Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.
    Tsunoda S; Obama K; Hisamori S; Nishigori T; Okamura R; Maekawa H; Sakai Y
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Feb; 28(2):639-647. PubMed ID: 32892268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robotic versus open Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: A more accurate lymph node dissection without burdening the leak rate.
    Weindelmayer J; De Pasqual CA; Turolo C; Gervasi MC; Sacco M; Bencivenga M; Giacopuzzi S
    J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jun; 127(7):1109-1115. PubMed ID: 36971002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Survival After Esophagectomy: A Propensity-Matched Study of Different Surgical Approaches.
    Weksler B; Sullivan JL
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2017 Oct; 104(4):1138-1146. PubMed ID: 28760463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robotic Versus Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Meta-analysis.
    Zhang Y; Dong D; Cao Y; Huang M; Li J; Zhang J; Lin J; Sarkaria IS; Toni L; David R; He J; Li H
    Ann Surg; 2023 Jul; 278(1):39-50. PubMed ID: 36538615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
    Tagkalos E; Goense L; Hoppe-Lotichius M; Ruurda JP; Babic B; Hadzijusufovic E; Kneist W; van der Sluis PC; Lang H; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 Apr; 33(4):. PubMed ID: 31206577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.