250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32274486)
1. [Evaluation of condylar asymmetry in different skeletal patterns with cone-beam CT].
Li WY; Chen WJ; Hou W; Qin JW; Duan YF; Mu JQ
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2019 Oct; 28(5):523-528. PubMed ID: 32274486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Cone-beam CT evaluation of temporomandibular joint in skeletal class Ⅱ female adolescents with different vertical patterns].
Zhou J; Liu Y
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Dec; 53(1):109-119. PubMed ID: 33550344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mandibular ramus height and condyle distance asymmetries in individuals with different facial growth patterns: a cone-beam computed tomography study.
Lemes CR; Tozzi CF; Gribel S; Gribel BF; Venezian GC; do Carmo Menezes C; Custodio W
Surg Radiol Anat; 2021 Feb; 43(2):267-274. PubMed ID: 32965519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of condylar size among different anteroposterior and vertical skeletal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography.
Hasebe A; Yamaguchi T; Nakawaki T; Hikita Y; Katayama K; Maki K
Angle Orthod; 2019 Mar; 89(2):306-311. PubMed ID: 30475648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Three-dimensional changes in condylar position in skeletal class Ⅲ patients with mandibular deviation after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy].
Huang JQ; Huang Z; Wu J; Wang YJ; Sang T; Liu F; Zheng Y
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Oct; 54(10):649-655. PubMed ID: 31606999
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional analysis of mandibular characteristics in patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion and chin deviation.
Lv W; Nie Q; Gu Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Sep; 160(3):392-400. PubMed ID: 34175163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 3-Dimensional CBCT analysis of mandibular asymmetry in unilateral condylar hyperplasia.
Nolte JW; Verhoeven TJ; Schreurs R; Bergé SJ; Karssemakers LH; Becking AG; Maal TJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Dec; 44(12):1970-1976. PubMed ID: 27818059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Morphologic evaluation and classification of facial asymmetry using 3-dimensional computed tomography.
Baek C; Paeng JY; Lee JS; Hong J
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 May; 70(5):1161-9. PubMed ID: 21763045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mandibular dimensions of subjects with asymmetric skeletal class III malocclusion and normal occlusion compared with cone-beam computed tomography.
Lee H; Bayome M; Kim SH; Kim KB; Behrents RG; Kook YA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Aug; 142(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 22858326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mandibular vertical asymmetry in adult orthodontic patients with different vertical growth patterns: A cone beam computed tomography study.
Celik S; Celikoglu M; Buyuk SK; Sekerci AE
Angle Orthod; 2016 Mar; 86(2):271-7. PubMed ID: 26065465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A cross-sectional study on three-dimensional compensatory characteristics of maxillary teeth in patients with different types of skeletal Class III malocclusion with mandibular asymmetry.
Li J; Liu Y; Ge X; Liu Z; Guan H; Wang L; Ma W
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Sep; 27(9):4973-4985. PubMed ID: 37417986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Linear and Volumetric Mandibular Asymmetries in Adult Patients With Different Skeletal Classes and Vertical Patterns: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study.
Mendoza LV; Bellot-Arcís C; Montiel-Company JM; García-Sanz V; Almerich-Silla JM; Paredes-Gallardo V
Sci Rep; 2018 Aug; 8(1):12319. PubMed ID: 30120301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cone-beam computed tomography study of mandibular morphology and tooth compensation in asymmetrical patients.
Marques FBC; Siqueira de Lima L; Coqueiro RDS; Pithon MM; Ruellas ACO; Maciel JVB; Nojima MDCG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Aug; 164(2):265-275. PubMed ID: 36967314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation on the condylar displacement following sagittal split ramus osteotomy in asymmetric setback patients: Comparison between conventional approach and surgery-first approach.
Oh MH; Hwang HS; Lee KM; Cho JH
Angle Orthod; 2017 Sep; 87(5):733-738. PubMed ID: 28530843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A novel measurement method for the morphology of the mandibular ramus using homologous modelling.
Inoue K; Nakano H; Sumida T; Yamada T; Otawa N; Fukuda N; Nakajima Y; Kumamaru W; Mishima K; Kouchi M; Takahashi I; Mori Y
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(8):20150062. PubMed ID: 26143939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional condylar positions and forms associated with different anteroposterior skeletal patterns and facial asymmetry in Chinese adolescents.
Zhang Y; Che B; Ni Y; Zhang H; Pan Y; Wang L; Ma J
Acta Odontol Scand; 2013 Sep; 71(5):1174-80. PubMed ID: 23294119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The three-dimensional morphology of mandible and glenoid fossa as contributing factors to menton deviation in facial asymmetry-retrospective study.
Oh MH; Cho JH
Prog Orthod; 2020 Sep; 21(1):33. PubMed ID: 32959138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Craniofacial features affecting mandibular asymmetries in skeletal Class II patients.
Thiesen G; Gribel BF; Freitas MPM; Oliver DR; Kim KB
J Orofac Orthop; 2017 Sep; 78(5):437-445. PubMed ID: 28667433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of mandibular morphology in patients with facial asymmetry and mandibular retrognathism.
You KH; Kim KH; Lee KJ; Baik HS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 May; 153(5):685-691. PubMed ID: 29706216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Skeletal and dental asymmetries in Class II subdivision malocclusions using cone-beam computed tomography.
Sanders DA; Rigali PH; Neace WP; Uribe F; Nanda R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):542.e1-20; discussion 542-3. PubMed ID: 21055586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
