700 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32274551)
1. Multiple metabolic parameters and visual assessment of
Ren Y; Liu J; Wang L; Luo Y; Ding X; Shi A; Liu J
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Nov; 45(11):3569-3580. PubMed ID: 32274551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. SUVmax/THKmax as a biomarker for distinguishing advanced gastric carcinoma from primary gastric lymphoma.
Fu L; Li H; Wang H; Xu B; Fan Y; Tian J
PLoS One; 2012; 7(12):e50914. PubMed ID: 23226547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography comparison of gastric lymphoma and gastric carcinoma.
Li XF; Fu Q; Dong YW; Liu JJ; Song XY; Dai D; Zuo C; Xu WG
World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Sep; 22(34):7787-96. PubMed ID: 27678362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 18F-FDG PET/CT in gastric MALT lymphoma: a bicentric experience.
Albano D; Bertoli M; Ferro P; Fallanca F; Gianolli L; Picchio M; Giubbini R; Bertagna F
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Apr; 44(4):589-597. PubMed ID: 27619357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preoperative Standardized Uptake Value of Metastatic Lymph Nodes Measured by 18F-FDG PET/CT Improves the Prediction of Prognosis in Gastric Cancer.
Song BI; Kim HW; Won KS; Ryu SW; Sohn SS; Kang YN
Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Jul; 94(26):e1037. PubMed ID: 26131811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differentiation of soft tissue and bone sarcomas from benign lesions utilizing
Chen B; Feng H; Xie J; Li C; Zhang Y; Wang S
BMC Med Imaging; 2020 Jul; 20(1):85. PubMed ID: 32711449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of biological parameters in head and neck cancer based on in vivo distribution of
Cegla P; Kazmierska J; Gwozdz S; Czepczynski R; Malicki J; Cholewinski W
Tumori; 2020 Feb; 106(1):33-38. PubMed ID: 31446858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9.
Zhou W; Wen J; Hua F; Xu W; Lu X; Yin B; Geng D; Guan Y
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Jul; 104():26-32. PubMed ID: 29857862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. FDG avidity and PET/CT patterns in primary gastric lymphoma.
Radan L; Fischer D; Bar-Shalom R; Dann EJ; Epelbaum R; Haim N; Gaitini D; Israel O
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2008 Aug; 35(8):1424-30. PubMed ID: 18418594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intra-tumor metabolic heterogeneity of gastric cancer on
Liu G; Yin H; Cheng X; Wang Y; Hu Y; Liu T; Shi H
Clin Exp Med; 2021 Feb; 21(1):129-138. PubMed ID: 32880779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preoperative prediction of the pathological stage of advanced gastric cancer by
Yamada K; Urakawa N; Kanaji S; Hasegawa H; Yamamoto M; Yamashita K; Matsuda T; Oshikiri T; Suzuki S; Kakeji Y
Sci Rep; 2022 Jul; 12(1):11370. PubMed ID: 35790785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic importance of 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters and total lesion glycolysis in differentiating between benign and malignant adrenal lesions.
Ciftci E; Turgut B; Cakmakcilar A; Erturk SA
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Sep; 38(9):788-794. PubMed ID: 28692494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic Impact of Pretreatment 2-[
Albano D; Dondi F; Mazzoletti A; Bellini P; Giubbini R; Bertagna F
Medicina (Kaunas); 2021 May; 57(5):. PubMed ID: 34069203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Prognostic value of pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET-CT for patients with advanced diffuse large B-cell lymphoma].
Ding CY; Guo Z; Sun J; Yang WP; Li TR
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Jul; 40(7):528-533. PubMed ID: 30060362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Baseline [
Yang Q; Luo Y; Zhang Y; Zhang W; Zhou D; Li F
Eur Radiol; 2022 Aug; 32(8):5568-5576. PubMed ID: 35316362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prognostic value of SUVmax measured by pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with primary gastric lymphoma.
Hwang JP; Lim I; Byun BH; Kim BI; Choi CW; Lim SM
Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Dec; 37(12):1267-1272. PubMed ID: 27482643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of F-18 FDG PET/CT with optimal cut-offs of maximum standardized uptake value according to size for diagnosis of regional lymph node metastasis in patients with rectal cancer.
Bae SU; Won KS; Song BI; Jeong WK; Baek SK; Kim HW
Cancer Imaging; 2018 Sep; 18(1):32. PubMed ID: 30217167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The relationship between (18)F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters and clinicopathological features of breast cancer].
Tang B; Zhang Y; Zhou J; Xu Y; Li TR; Ding CY
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2017 Apr; 39(4):280-285. PubMed ID: 28550668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in the Detection of Ovarian Malignancy.
Park T; Lee S; Park S; Lee E; Pahk K; Rhee S; Cho J; Kim C; Eo JS; Choe JG; Kim S
Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Mar; 49(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 25774237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
