733 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32274551)
21. Value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in the Detection of Ovarian Malignancy.
Park T; Lee S; Park S; Lee E; Pahk K; Rhee S; Cho J; Kim C; Eo JS; Choe JG; Kim S
Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Mar; 49(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 25774237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis from ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in lymph node metastases and risk stratification of endometrial carcinoma.
Liu DD; Li J; Li X; Xie L; Qin L; Peng F; Cheng MH
J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Nov; 30(6):e89. PubMed ID: 31576685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Predictive value of pretreatment metabolic activity measured by fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with metastatic advanced gastric cancer: the maximal SUV of the stomach is a prognostic factor.
Park JC; Lee JH; Cheoi K; Chung H; Yun MJ; Lee H; Shin SK; Lee SK; Lee YC
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2012 Jul; 39(7):1107-16. PubMed ID: 22526958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prognostic significance of metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis in patients with advanced cervical carcinoma.
Calles-Sastre L; Mucientes-Rasilla J; San-Frutos Llorente LM; Royuela A; Garcia-Espantaleón Navas M; Herrero Gámiz S; Pérez-Medina T
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2019; 38(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 30366731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Prognostic significance of interim
Lee SY; Seo HJ; Kim S; Eo JS; Oh SC
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2018 Oct; 14(5):e302-e309. PubMed ID: 29226597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The clinical implications of FDG-PET/CT differ according to histology in advanced gastric cancer.
Chon HJ; Kim C; Cho A; Kim YM; Jang SJ; Kim BO; Park CH; Hyung WJ; Ahn JB; Noh SH; Yun M; Rha SY
Gastric Cancer; 2019 Jan; 22(1):113-122. PubMed ID: 29948387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Do 18F-FDG PET/CT findings have a relationship with histopathological and immunohistochemical factors of breast cancer in men?
Vatankulu B; Işik G; Kocael P; Kuyumcu S; Ilvan Ş; Sağer S; Halaç M; Türkmen C; Sönmezoğlu K
Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Dec; 37(12):1273-1281. PubMed ID: 27472037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Lymph node standardized uptake values at pre-treatment
Jeong Y; Baek S; Park JW; Joo JH; Kim JS; Lee SW
Br J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 90(1071):20160239. PubMed ID: 28008776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The role of
Rufini V; Collarino A; Calcagni ML; Meduri GM; Fuoco V; Pasciuto T; Testa AC; Ferrandina G; Gambacorta MA; Campitelli M; Gui B; Zannoni G; Manfredi R; Scambia G; Giordano A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 May; 47(5):1228-1238. PubMed ID: 31414206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Correlations of
Wang JL; Shi AQ; Fan CC; Wang YZ; Guo GR; Liu JY
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2022 Aug; 44(4):628-635. PubMed ID: 36065696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The Association Between Liver and Tumor [
Wu X; Bhattarai A; Korkola P; Pertovaara H; Eskola H; Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL
Mol Imaging Biol; 2017 Oct; 19(5):787-794. PubMed ID: 28144908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Added value of pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET/CT for staging of advanced gastric cancer: Comparison with contrast-enhanced MDCT.
Kawanaka Y; Kitajima K; Fukushima K; Mouri M; Doi H; Oshima T; Niwa H; Kaibe N; Sasako M; Tomita T; Miwa H; Hirota S
Eur J Radiol; 2016 May; 85(5):989-95. PubMed ID: 27130061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Functional Parameters of
Yang J; Zhu S; Pang F; Xu M; Dong Y; Hao J; Ma X
Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2018; 2018():8659826. PubMed ID: 30363729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Metabolic Tumor Volume on 18F-FDG PET/CT Improves Preoperative Identification of High-Risk Endometrial Carcinoma Patients.
Husby JA; Reitan BC; Biermann M; Trovik J; Bjørge L; Magnussen IJ; Salvesen ØO; Salvesen HB; Haldorsen IS
J Nucl Med; 2015 Aug; 56(8):1191-8. PubMed ID: 26045311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35.
Qin C; Shao F; Hu F; Song W; Song Y; Guo J; Lan X
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 May; 47(5):1083-1093. PubMed ID: 31807883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Correlation between
Zhao J; Wang H
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2021 Apr; 65(2):188-194. PubMed ID: 33538120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Lymph node staging of gastric cancer using (18)F-FDG PET: a comparison study with CT.
Yun M; Lim JS; Noh SH; Hyung WJ; Cheong JH; Bong JK; Cho A; Lee JD
J Nucl Med; 2005 Oct; 46(10):1582-8. PubMed ID: 16204706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Improved detection of metastatic lymph nodes in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma by combined interpretation of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography/computed tomography.
Lee JY; Kim YH; Park YJ; Park SB; Chung HW; Zo JI; Shim YM; Lee KS; Choi JY
Cancer Imaging; 2019 Jun; 19(1):40. PubMed ID: 31227017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Volumetric parameters on
Liu G; Hu Y; Cheng X; Wang Y; Gu Y; Liu T; Shi H
BMC Cancer; 2019 Aug; 19(1):790. PubMed ID: 31395059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. 18F-FDG uptake and its clinical relevance in primary gastric lymphoma.
Yi JH; Kim SJ; Choi JY; Ko YH; Kim BT; Kim WS
Hematol Oncol; 2010 Jun; 28(2):57-61. PubMed ID: 19593742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
