699 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32274551)
41. Impact of
Zhou N; Liu C; Guo X; Xu Y; Gong J; Qi C; Zhang X; Yang M; Zhu H; Shen L; Yang Z
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Jan; 48(1):161-175. PubMed ID: 32564171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Prediction of ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration cytology results by FDG PET-CT for lymph node metastases in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients.
Peltenburg B; de Keizer B; Dankbaar JW; de Boer M; Willems SM; Philippens MEP; Terhaard CHJ; de Bree R
Acta Oncol; 2018 Dec; 57(12):1687-1692. PubMed ID: 30489180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Superiority of [
Fu L; Huang S; Wu H; Dong Y; Xie F; Wu R; Zhou K; Tang G; Zhou W
Eur Radiol; 2022 Sep; 32(9):6281-6290. PubMed ID: 35380229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The prognostic value of volume-based parameters using
Park JS; Lee N; Beom SH; Kim HS; Lee CK; Rha SY; Chung HC; Yun M; Cho A; Jung M
Gastric Cancer; 2018 Mar; 21(2):213-224. PubMed ID: 28643145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. [
Lee K; Kim YI; Oh JS; Seo SY; Yun JK; Lee GD; Choi S; Kim HR; Kim YH; Kim DK; Park SI; Ryu JS
Sci Rep; 2023 Oct; 13(1):17619. PubMed ID: 37848723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Prognostic Value of Metabolic and Volumetric Parameters of Preoperative FDG-PET/CT in Patients With Resectable Pancreatic Cancer.
Im HJ; Oo S; Jung W; Jang JY; Kim SW; Cheon GJ; Kang KW; Chung JK; Kim EE; Lee DS
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 May; 95(19):e3686. PubMed ID: 27175707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Common malignant brain tumors: can 18F-FDG PET/CT aid in differentiation?
Purandare NC; Puranik A; Shah S; Agrawal A; Gupta T; Moiyadi A; Shetty P; Shridhar E; Jalali R; Rangarajan V
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Dec; 38(12):1109-1116. PubMed ID: 28922334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Relationship Between 18F-FDG PET/CT Findings and HER2 Expression in Gastric Cancer.
Chen R; Zhou X; Liu J; Huang G
J Nucl Med; 2016 Jul; 57(7):1040-4. PubMed ID: 26966162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Assessing
Sarikaya I; Sarikaya A
J Nucl Med Technol; 2019 Jun; 47(2):149-153. PubMed ID: 30413593
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Can metabolic tumor parameters on primary staging
Okuyucu K; Alagoz E; Ince S; Ozaydin S; Arslan N
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2018; 37(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 28733137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The diagnostic ability of
Lee JW; Kim EY; Kim DJ; Lee JH; Kang WJ; Lee JD; Yun M
Eur Radiol; 2016 Dec; 26(12):4515-4523. PubMed ID: 26943133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. FDG PET/CT used in identifying adult-onset Still's disease in connective tissue diseases.
Zhou X; Li Y; Wang Q
Clin Rheumatol; 2020 Sep; 39(9):2735-2742. PubMed ID: 32180040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Predictive value of
Wang J; Yu X; Shi A; Xie L; Huang L; Su Y; Zha J; Liu J
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2023 Nov; 149(16):14535-14547. PubMed ID: 37567986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Does Measurement of First-Order and Heterogeneity Parameters Improve Response Assessment of Bone Metastases in Breast Cancer Compared to SUV
Azad GK; Cousin F; Siddique M; Taylor B; Goh V; Cook GJR
Mol Imaging Biol; 2019 Aug; 21(4):781-789. PubMed ID: 30250989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Prognostic value of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma and mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma.
Lim SM; Kim H; Kang B; Kim HS; Rha SY; Noh SH; Hyung WJ; Cheong JH; Kim HI; Chung HC; Yun M; Cho A; Jung M
Ann Nucl Med; 2016 May; 30(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 26837515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Should 18F-FDG PET/CT Be Routinely Performed in the Clinical Staging of Locally Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma?
Perlaza P; Ortín J; Pagès M; Buxó E; Fernández-Esparrach G; Colletti PM; Rubello D; Mayoral M; Sánchez N; Ruiz C; Ginés A; Fuster D
Clin Nucl Med; 2018 Jun; 43(6):402-410. PubMed ID: 29485442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance in Lymphoma: Comparison With 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and With the Addition of Magnetic Resonance Diffusion-Weighted Imaging.
Giraudo C; Raderer M; Karanikas G; Weber M; Kiesewetter B; Dolak W; Simonitsch-Klupp I; Mayerhoefer ME
Invest Radiol; 2016 Mar; 51(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 26784400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Correlations between maximum standardized uptake value measured via
Li H; Wang X; Zhang L; Yi X; Qiao Y; Jin Q
J Cancer Res Ther; 2019; 15(7):1581-1588. PubMed ID: 31939441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. [The value of (18)F-FDG PET-CT imaging in predicting the malignant potential of GIST].
Li SX; Tang MD; Lin DY; Liu DJ; Lyu QH; Zhang JP; Cai ZH
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 39(11):821-827. PubMed ID: 29151288
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. The maximum standardized uptake value of metastatic site in 18 F-FDG PET/CT predicts molecular subtypes and survival in metastatic breast cancer: An Izmir Oncology Group study.
Cokmert S; Tanriverdi O; Karapolat I; Demir L; Bayoglu V; Can A; Akyol M; Yilmaz Y; Oktay Tarhan M
J BUON; 2016; 21(6):1410-1418. PubMed ID: 28039701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
