These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32275592)

  • 1. No-Reference Video Quality Assessment Using Natural Spatiotemporal Scene Statistics.
    Dendi SVR; Channappayya SS
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2020 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 32275592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. FOVQA: Blind Foveated Video Quality Assessment.
    Jin Y; Patney A; Webb R; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():4571-4584. PubMed ID: 35767478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatiotemporal Statistics for Video Quality Assessment.
    Xuelong Li ; Qun Guo ; Xiaoqiang Lu
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 Jul; 25(7):3329-3342. PubMed ID: 27187966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. No-Reference Video Quality Assessment Using the Temporal Statistics of Global and Local Image Features.
    Varga D
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Dec; 22(24):. PubMed ID: 36560065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Study of Subjective Quality and Objective Blind Quality Prediction of Stereoscopic Videos.
    Appina B; Dendi SVR; Manasa K; Channappayya SS; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2019 May; ():. PubMed ID: 31094690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Universal blind image quality assessment metrics via natural scene statistics and multiple kernel learning.
    Gao X; Gao F; Tao D; Li X
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2013 Dec; 24(12):2013-26. PubMed ID: 24805219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Screen Content Video Quality Assessment Model Using Hybrid Spatiotemporal Features.
    Zeng H; Huang H; Hou J; Cao J; Wang Y; Ma KK
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():6175-6187. PubMed ID: 36126028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Screen Content Video Quality Assessment: Subjective and Objective Study.
    Cheng S; Zeng H; Chen J; Hou J; Zhu J; Ma KK
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2020 Aug; PP():. PubMed ID: 32845839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An Optical Flow-Based Full Reference Video Quality Assessment Algorithm.
    K M; Channappayya SS
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 Jun; 25(6):2480-92. PubMed ID: 27093720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Blind Video Quality Assessment for Ultra-High-Definition Video Based on Super-Resolution and Deep Reinforcement Learning.
    Ying Z; Pan D; Shi P
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jan; 23(3):. PubMed ID: 36772550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multivariate Statistical Approach to Image Quality Tasks.
    Gupta P; Bampis CG; Glover JL; Paulter NG; Bovik AC
    J Imaging; 2018; 4(10):. PubMed ID: 33043059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Blind prediction of natural video quality.
    Saad MA; Bovik AC; Charrier C
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2014 Mar; 23(3):1352-65. PubMed ID: 24723532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ST-GREED: Space-Time Generalized Entropic Differences for Frame Rate Dependent Video Quality Prediction.
    Madhusudana PC; Birkbeck N; Wang Y; Adsumilli B; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2021; 30():7446-7457. PubMed ID: 34449359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contrastive Self-Supervised Pre-Training for Video Quality Assessment.
    Chen P; Li L; Wu J; Dong W; Shi G
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():458-471. PubMed ID: 34874856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Objective Video Quality Assessment Combining Transfer Learning With CNN.
    Zhang Y; Gao X; He L; Lu W; He R
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2020 Aug; 31(8):2716-2730. PubMed ID: 30736007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting the Quality of Compressed Videos With Pre-Existing Distortions.
    Yu X; Birkbeck N; Wang Y; Bampis CG; Adsumilli B; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2021; 30():7511-7526. PubMed ID: 34460374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Study of the Subjective and Objective Quality of High Motion Live Streaming Videos.
    Shang Z; Ebenezer JP; Wu Y; Wei H; Sethuraman S; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():1027-1041. PubMed ID: 34951848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Completely Blind Video Integrity Oracle.
    Mittal A; Saad MA; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 Jan; 25(1):289-300. PubMed ID: 26599970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. CONVIQT: Contrastive Video Quality Estimator.
    Madhusudana PC; Birkbeck N; Wang Y; Adsumilli B; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2023; 32():5138-5152. PubMed ID: 37676804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ChipQA: No-Reference Video Quality Prediction via Space-Time Chips.
    Ebenezer JP; Shang Z; Wu Y; Wei H; Sethuraman S; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2021; 30():8059-8074. PubMed ID: 34534087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.