These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32275778)

  • 1. On adaptation cost and tractability in robust adaptive radiation therapy optimization.
    Böck M
    Med Phys; 2020 Jul; 47(7):2791-2804. PubMed ID: 32275778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Toward robust adaptive radiation therapy strategies.
    Böck M; Eriksson K; Forsgren A; Hårdemark B
    Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2054-2065. PubMed ID: 28317129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dosimetric Evaluation of Incorporating Patient Geometric Variations Into Adaptive Plan Optimization Through Probabilistic Treatment Planning in Head and Neck Cancers.
    Liu Q; Liang J; Zhou D; Krauss DJ; Chen PY; Yan D
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2018 Jul; 101(4):985-997. PubMed ID: 29976511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Worst case optimization for interfractional motion mitigation in carbon ion therapy of pancreatic cancer.
    Steitz J; Naumann P; Ulrich S; Haefner MF; Sterzing F; Oelfke U; Bangert M
    Radiat Oncol; 2016 Oct; 11(1):134. PubMed ID: 27717378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anatomical robust optimization to account for nasal cavity filling variation during intensity-modulated proton therapy: a comparison with conventional and adaptive planning strategies.
    van de Water S; Albertini F; Weber DC; Heijmen BJM; Hoogeman MS; Lomax AJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(2):025020. PubMed ID: 29160775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment and management of interfractional variations in daily diagnostic-quality-CT guided prostate-bed irradiation after prostatectomy.
    Liu F; Ahunbay E; Lawton C; Li XA
    Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031710. PubMed ID: 24593714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Online-adaptive versus robust IMPT for prostate cancer: How much can we gain?
    Jagt TZ; Breedveld S; van Haveren R; Heijmen BJM; Hoogeman MS
    Radiother Oncol; 2020 Oct; 151():228-233. PubMed ID: 32777242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of linear and nonlinear programming approaches for "worst case dose" and "minmax" robust optimization of intensity-modulated proton therapy dose distributions.
    Zaghian M; Cao W; Liu W; Kardar L; Randeniya S; Mohan R; Lim G
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):15-25. PubMed ID: 28300378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accelerated robust optimization algorithm for proton therapy treatment planning.
    Buti G; Souris K; Barragán Montero AM; Cohilis M; Lee JA; Sterpin E
    Med Phys; 2020 Jul; 47(7):2746-2754. PubMed ID: 32155667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robust mixed electron-photon radiation therapy optimization.
    Renaud MA; Serban M; Seuntjens J
    Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1384-1396. PubMed ID: 30628079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robust Optimization of SBRT Planning for Patients With Early Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
    Shang H; Pu Y; Wang Y
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2020; 19():1533033820916505. PubMed ID: 32314663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dose-shaping using targeted sparse optimization.
    Sayre GA; Ruan D
    Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):071711. PubMed ID: 23822415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Direct aperture optimization for online adaptive radiation therapy.
    Mestrovic A; Milette MP; Nichol A; Clark BG; Otto K
    Med Phys; 2007 May; 34(5):1631-46. PubMed ID: 17555245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using Robust Optimization for Skin Flashing in Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer Treatment: A Feasibility Study.
    Liang X; Bradley JA; Mailhot Vega RB; Rutenberg M; Zheng D; Getman N; Norton KW; Mendenhall N; Li Z
    Pract Radiat Oncol; 2020; 10(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 31627030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Coverage optimized planning: probabilistic treatment planning based on dose coverage histogram criteria.
    Gordon JJ; Sayah N; Weiss E; Siebers JV
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):550-63. PubMed ID: 20229863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Real-time adaptive planning method for radiotherapy treatment delivery for prostate cancer patients, based on a library of plans accounting for possible anatomy configuration changes.
    Antico M; Prinsen P; Cellini F; Fracassi A; Isola AA; Cobben D; Fontanarosa D
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0213002. PubMed ID: 30818345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A characterization of robust radiation therapy treatment planning methods-from expected value to worst case optimization.
    Fredriksson A
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5169-81. PubMed ID: 22894442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A novel and individualized robust optimization method using normalized dose interval volume constraints (NDIVC) for intensity-modulated proton radiotherapy.
    Shan J; Sio TT; Liu C; Schild SE; Bues M; Liu W
    Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 46(1):382-393. PubMed ID: 30387870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Statistical evaluation of worst-case robust optimization intensity-modulated proton therapy plans using an exhaustive sampling approach.
    Yang Z; Li H; Li Y; Li Y; Chang Y; Li Q; Yang K; Wu G; Sahoo N; Poenisch F; Gillin M; Zhu XR; Zhang X
    Radiat Oncol; 2019 Jul; 14(1):129. PubMed ID: 31324257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Strategies for automatic online treatment plan reoptimization using clinical treatment planning system: a planning parameters study.
    Li T; Wu Q; Zhang Y; Vergalasova I; Lee WR; Yin FF; Wu QJ
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111711. PubMed ID: 24320419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.